Knockout

Opening Move

158,401 battles collected on this map.

OPEN — more choice than on most maps: 84 of 106 brawlers above 50%.

Recommendation

Damage Dealer 5349 games

Damage Dealer 2410 games

Controller 4836 games

Controller 2450 games

Damage Dealer 5856 games

Controller 2827 games

Controller 8710 games

Damage Dealer 2256 games

Controller 6192 games

Damage Dealer 2487 games

What the rating, star, trust and the tags mean

Strong pickThe rank on this map among all map/brawler rows of the mode (Knockout): Strong pick top tenth, Good pick top quarter, Solid upper half, Rather not the rest. The thresholds come from the field — the exact values are in the badge's tooltip. Not the tier list: that counts how many maps of the rotation a brawler is usable on. Rather not among the recommended eight therefore does not mean “bad”, but: this map has nothing better to offer.

TrustHow dependable the win rate next to it is, 0–100. Depends purely on the number of games — not on how good the brawler is.

Carry — becomes star player unusually often on this map: he deals the damage and takes the objective. The game runs through him.

Enabler — rarely becomes star player: he clears the way, heals, controls, and others do the scoring. This is no verdict on his strength — how good he is here is the win rate on the card. Measured across 1,620 map/brawler rows, enablers win on average 3.8 points less often than carries, but the star rate explains only 11% of the differences: there are plenty of strong enablers and weak carries. The star says how a brawler wins, not whether.

Hidden gems & traps

From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.

Underrated

Jae-Yong 65.4%Winrate 1,884 games

R-T 64.8%Winrate 2,410 games

Otis 63.0%Winrate 4,836 games

Gigi 63.2%Winrate 3,034 games

Overrated

Edgar 32.5%Winrate 71,753 games

Piper 43.8%Winrate 56,946 games

Colt 33.4%Winrate 42,085 games

Brock 45.7%Winrate 49,100 games

If you queue as three

The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.

Searched freely across 9,842 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 3,629 real line-ups.

82.7% expected

82.5% expected

82.2% expected

82.2% expected

82.1% expected

81.8% expected

How these numbers are arrived at

What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.

Best · on this map. All 9,842 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 3,629 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.

What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (8 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.

All brawlers on this map

Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.

#		Brawler	Win rate	Games	Trust	Pick rate	Rating
1	–	Wendy	76.0%	19989	100	1.7%	Strong pick
2	–	Bolt	68.7%	9506	92	0.9%	Strong pick
3	–	Pearl	68.3%	5349	84	0.6%	Strong pick
4	–	Nori	65.3%	44305	100	4.5%	Strong pick
5	–	Starr Nova	63.5%	9875	93	0.9%	Strong pick
6	–	Pierce	63.3%	15080	99	1.4%	Strong pick
7	▲ 2	Jae-Yong	65.4%	1884	68	0.2%	Strong pick
8	▼ 2	R-T	64.8%	2410	72	0.2%	Strong pick
9	–	Meeple	63.2%	8364	90	0.8%	Strong pick
10	–	Najia	62.9%	7274	88	0.7%	Strong pick
11	–	Gray	62.2%	15776	100	1.5%	Strong pick
12	▲ 1	Otis	63.0%	4836	82	0.4%	Strong pick
13	▼ 1	Mina	62.3%	8381	90	0.9%	Strong pick
14	–	Gigi	63.2%	3034	75	0.3%	Strong pick
15	▲ 1	Sprout	61.8%	7414	88	0.6%	Strong pick
16	▼ 1	Meg	62.0%	5696	85	0.6%	Strong pick
17	–	Ash	63.2%	1962	69	0.2%	Good pick
18	–	Charlie	62.6%	2450	72	0.2%	Good pick
19	▲ 1	Chester	61.4%	5856	85	0.6%	Good pick
20	▲ 1	Ziggy	62.3%	2415	72	0.2%	Good pick
21	▲ 1	Lou	62.0%	2827	74	0.3%	Good pick
22	▼ 3	Sirius	61.6%	3533	77	0.3%	Good pick
23	▲ 2	Griff	60.7%	8710	91	0.9%	Good pick
24	▼ 1	Glowy	61.7%	2944	75	0.3%	Good pick
25	▼ 1	Moe	62.0%	2256	71	0.2%	Good pick
26	–	Ruffs	61.4%	3193	76	0.3%	Good pick
27	▲ 1	Shade	60.6%	4058	79	0.5%	Good pick
28	▲ 1	Bo	60.1%	6192	86	0.7%	Good pick
29	▲ 4	Trunk	62.2%	1517	65	0.2%	Good pick
30	▼ 3	Cordelius	60.6%	3489	77	0.3%	Good pick
31	▼ 1	Damian	61.8%	1624	66	0.2%	Good pick
32	▼ 1	Mico	60.0%	3976	79	0.3%	Good pick
33	▲ 1	Lumi	60.6%	2487	72	0.2%	Good pick
34	▼ 2	Kit	59.0%	10376	94	0.9%	Good pick
35	–	Gus	58.9%	10677	94	1.1%	Good pick
36	▲ 2	Stu	58.6%	9621	92	1.1%	Good pick
37	▲ 4	Finx	60.0%	2345	71	0.2%	Good pick
38	▼ 2	Buster	60.8%	1528	65	0.1%	Good pick
39	▼ 2	Kaze	58.9%	4985	83	0.5%	Good pick
40	▼ 1	Belle	58.2%	8305	90	0.8%	Good pick
41	▼ 1	Doug	59.2%	2848	74	0.3%	Solid
42	–	Angelo	58.4%	5274	83	0.5%	Solid
43	▲ 7	Squeak	58.0%	7713	89	0.8%	Solid
44	–	Mr. P	59.0%	2686	73	0.2%	Solid
45	▲ 2	Janet	58.9%	2757	74	0.2%	Solid
46	▼ 3	Alli	59.0%	2448	72	0.2%	Solid
47	▲ 4	Eve	59.6%	1780	67	0.1%	Solid
48	▼ 3	Lily	57.7%	8339	90	0.8%	Solid
49	▼ 3	Mandy	57.3%	18427	100	1.6%	Solid
50	▲ 2	Kenji	57.7%	7602	89	0.7%	Solid
51	▼ 2	Gene	57.9%	5511	84	0.5%	Solid
52	▲ 2	Juju	60.1%	1169	61	0.1%	Solid
53	–	Willow	58.7%	2412	72	0.2%	Solid
54	▲ 5	Jacky	59.2%	1634	66	0.2%	Solid
55	▼ 7	Draco	60.3%	1030	59	0.1%	Solid
56	–	Nani	57.2%	7786	89	0.8%	Solid
57	–	Amber	58.0%	2951	75	0.3%	Solid
58	–	Maisie	57.8%	3228	76	0.3%	Solid
59	▼ 4	Clancy	60.8%	780	55	0.1%	Solid
60	▲ 1	Larry & Lawrie	58.0%	2712	73	0.3%	Solid
61	▼ 1	Sandy	58.2%	2310	71	0.2%	Solid
62	–	Gale	57.4%	2550	73	0.3%	Solid
63	▲ 2	Berry	57.7%	2108	70	0.2%	Solid
64	–	Fang	55.9%	10972	94	1.2%	Solid
65	▲ 2	Mortis	55.5%	18300	100	2.0%	Solid
66	▲ 2	Buzz	56.5%	3758	78	0.4%	Solid
67	▼ 1	Lola	57.2%	2201	70	0.2%	Solid
68	▼ 5	Ollie	59.0%	897	57	0.1%	Solid
69	–	Bonnie	56.2%	3238	76	0.3%	Solid
70	–	Penny	55.7%	4781	82	0.5%	Solid
71	–	Grom	55.9%	3657	78	0.3%	Solid
72	–	Max	54.8%	10354	93	1.1%	Solid
73	–	Melodie	55.9%	1758	67	0.2%	Solid
74	–	Hank	55.1%	1700	66	0.2%	Solid
75	▲ 1	Tick	53.2%	10487	94	1.0%	Rather not
76	▼ 1	Sam	55.1%	1425	64	0.1%	Rather not
77	–	Carl	52.8%	8008	90	0.9%	Rather not
78	–	Byron	52.2%	23639	100	2.3%	Rather not
79	–	Surge	52.6%	10032	93	0.9%	Rather not
80	–	Tara	52.5%	4218	80	0.5%	Rather not
81	–	Bea	51.3%	10612	94	1.0%	Rather not
82	–	Chuck	53.3%	974	58	0.1%	Rather not
83	–	Pam	51.4%	1746	67	0.2%	Rather not
84	–	Poco	50.0%	5660	84	0.6%	Rather not
85	–	Barley	49.1%	3502	77	0.4%	Rather not
86	–	Bull	48.8%	4222	80	0.5%	Rather not
87	–	Darryl	48.4%	5025	83	0.6%	Rather not
88	–	Rosa	47.7%	2459	72	0.3%	Rather not
89	–	Brock	45.7%	49100	100	5.0%	Rather not
90	–	Bibi	46.2%	5987	85	0.7%	Rather not
91	–	Jessie	46.2%	4975	83	0.6%	Rather not
92	–	Colette	45.8%	10113	93	1.1%	Rather not
93	–	Dynamike	44.4%	12234	96	1.3%	Rather not
94	–	Piper	43.8%	56946	100	5.6%	Rather not
95	–	Leon	43.8%	19473	100	2.0%	Rather not
96	–	Spike	43.7%	14060	98	1.7%	Rather not
97	–	Emz	39.5%	15646	100	1.9%	Rather not
98	–	Frank	38.3%	7200	88	0.9%	Rather not
99	–	Crow	37.0%	20304	100	2.2%	Rather not
100	–	8-Bit	36.4%	22826	100	2.8%	Rather not
101	–	Nita	36.3%	7200	88	0.9%	Rather not
102	–	Rico	34.4%	35066	100	4.3%	Rather not
103	–	Colt	33.4%	42085	100	5.1%	Rather not
104	–	Edgar	32.5%	71753	100	8.4%	Rather not
105	–	El Primo	28.0%	11482	95	1.6%	Rather not
106	–	Shelly	26.9%	17777	100	2.3%	Rather not