
Hot Zone
189,840 battles collected on this map — ranked only.
TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 25 of 105 brawlers above 50%.
Short rounds Median 77 s out of 77–105 s in this mode. Early pressure pays off — anyone looking to outplay is playing against the map.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 8,050 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 573 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 8,050 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 573 real line-ups from a different rank tier, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (1,892 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here. The numbers also come from the solo queue: the battles behind them were fought by three strangers, not a practised team.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Doug |
66.3% | 36487 | 100 | 3.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | R-T |
66.4% | 12061 | 96 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Juju |
63.5% | 7227 | 88 | 0.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | Hank |
62.3% | 10428 | 94 | 1.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | – | Bibi |
60.5% | 35003 | 100 | 3.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | – | Jacky |
60.3% | 9959 | 93 | 1.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | – | Trunk |
56.1% | 87200 | 100 | 8.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | – | Kenji |
55.3% | 13287 | 97 | 1.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | – | Sirius |
54.7% | 12790 | 97 | 1.3% | Good pick | ||
| 10 | – | Bull |
54.7% | 11158 | 95 | 1.1% | Good pick | ||
| 11 | – | Surge |
54.2% | 26804 | 100 | 2.7% | Good pick | ||
| 12 | – | Edgar |
53.3% | 100518 | 100 | 10.3% | Good pick | ||
| 13 | – | Shade |
53.1% | 43993 | 100 | 4.5% | Good pick | ||
| 14 | – | Cordelius |
53.8% | 7503 | 89 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | – | Mico |
52.8% | 16030 | 100 | 1.6% | Good pick | ||
| 16 | – | Bolt |
53.6% | 2931 | 75 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | – | El Primo |
52.5% | 6167 | 86 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | – | Larry & Lawrie |
51.9% | 5085 | 83 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | – | Nita |
51.3% | 10119 | 93 | 1.0% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | – | Berry |
50.9% | 7359 | 88 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | – | Sam |
54.1% | 534 | 49 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 22 | – | Tick |
50.1% | 19485 | 100 | 2.0% | Solid | ||
| 23 | – | Buzz |
50.6% | 5619 | 84 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 24 | – | Nori |
49.4% | 92564 | 100 | 9.4% | Solid | ||
| 25 | – | Ash |
50.6% | 2466 | 72 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 26 | – | Willow |
48.8% | 42180 | 100 | 4.3% | Solid | ||
| 27 | – | Barley |
49.5% | 6217 | 86 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 28 | – | Gigi |
50.5% | 1555 | 65 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 29 | – | Damian |
49.3% | 4320 | 80 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 30 | – | Chester |
49.0% | 4688 | 82 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 31 | – | Mina |
49.7% | 1944 | 68 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 32 | – | Kit |
48.4% | 4539 | 81 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 33 | – | Dynamike |
47.8% | 15124 | 99 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 34 | – | Griff |
47.6% | 21485 | 100 | 2.2% | Solid | ||
| 35 | – | Starr Nova |
47.7% | 10721 | 94 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 36 | – | Stu |
48.0% | 4449 | 81 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 37 | – | Gale |
47.4% | 2989 | 75 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 38 | – | Lily |
47.2% | 3707 | 78 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 39 | – | Meeple |
46.3% | 3953 | 79 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 40 | – | Mortis |
45.6% | 10356 | 93 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 41 | – | Fang |
45.5% | 5619 | 84 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 42 | ▲ 1 | Ruffs |
46.4% | 567 | 50 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 43 | ▼ 1 | Emz |
44.0% | 42889 | 100 | 4.4% | Rather not | ||
| 44 | ▼ 1 | Maisie |
45.9% | 870 | 56 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 45 | ▲ 1 | Lou |
44.8% | 3216 | 76 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 46 | ▼ 1 | Carl |
44.5% | 2765 | 74 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 47 | ▼ 1 | Bo |
43.7% | 15111 | 99 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 48 | ▲ 2 | Pearl |
44.6% | 2019 | 69 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 49 | ▲ 1 | Otis |
44.3% | 2347 | 71 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 50 | – | Draco |
45.0% | 811 | 55 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 51 | – | Darryl |
44.2% | 2619 | 73 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 52 | – | Moe |
45.3% | 360 | 43 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | ▼ 1 | Lumi |
43.9% | 2314 | 71 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | – | Spike |
42.9% | 11089 | 95 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | ▼ 1 | Frank |
42.8% | 10706 | 94 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | ▲ 1 | Shelly |
42.9% | 6976 | 88 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | – | Rosa |
43.4% | 1418 | 64 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | – | Finx |
43.0% | 741 | 54 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | – | Ziggy |
42.9% | 927 | 57 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | – | Chuck |
42.5% | 1632 | 66 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | – | Alli |
42.3% | 921 | 57 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▲ 1 | Mr. P |
42.3% | 1200 | 61 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▲ 2 | Ollie |
41.3% | 160 | 31 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▼ 4 | Gray |
41.9% | 931 | 57 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▲ 1 | Penny |
41.1% | 5578 | 84 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | – | Kaze |
40.4% | 33019 | 100 | 3.4% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | – | Clancy |
41.5% | 975 | 58 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | – | Amber |
41.4% | 1680 | 66 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | – | Melodie |
41.2% | 1044 | 59 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | – | Meg |
40.5% | 4435 | 81 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▲ 1 | Najia |
40.2% | 1121 | 60 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | – | Janet |
39.4% | 277 | 39 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▼ 1 | Buster |
39.0% | 259 | 38 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | – | Jessie |
39.3% | 7231 | 88 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | – | Leon |
39.0% | 4205 | 80 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | – | Pierce |
39.0% | 2264 | 71 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | – | Sandy |
38.8% | 1224 | 62 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | – | Brock |
37.6% | 11559 | 95 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | – | Poco |
38.0% | 2074 | 69 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | – | Squeak |
37.5% | 7404 | 88 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | – | Glowy |
37.3% | 628 | 52 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | – | Tara |
37.6% | 2438 | 72 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | – | 8-Bit |
36.9% | 10972 | 94 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | – | Mandy |
37.2% | 1412 | 64 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | – | Angelo |
35.3% | 295 | 40 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▼ 1 | Jae-Yong |
31.5% | 168 | 32 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▲ 1 | Rico |
36.1% | 9914 | 93 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▲ 2 | Gus |
35.8% | 759 | 54 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | – | Charlie |
35.6% | 683 | 53 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | – | Lola |
34.2% | 365 | 43 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | – | Sprout |
35.8% | 1043 | 59 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | – | Colette |
35.8% | 3271 | 76 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▼ 1 | Eve |
35.0% | 642 | 52 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▼ 1 | Max |
35.6% | 2683 | 73 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▼ 1 | Crow |
35.1% | 6984 | 88 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▲ 1 | Nani |
34.9% | 916 | 57 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | – | Pam |
33.6% | 1128 | 60 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | – | Grom |
32.5% | 1192 | 61 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | – | Colt |
32.2% | 5468 | 84 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | – | Bea |
31.3% | 1206 | 61 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | – | Byron |
29.6% | 1718 | 67 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | – | Belle |
25.7% | 510 | 48 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | – | Bonnie |
20.4% | 461 | 47 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | – | Piper |
23.4% | 1599 | 66 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Gene |
17.6% | 460 | 47 | 0.0% | Rather not |