
Hot Zone
32,662 battles collected on this map.
TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 48 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
Short rounds Median 77 s out of 77–105 s in this mode. Early pressure pays off — anyone looking to outplay is playing against the map.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 8,549 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 899 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 8,549 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 899 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (451 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Wendy |
70.1% | 2914 | 75 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Trunk |
69.4% | 3199 | 76 | 1.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Nori |
66.2% | 9252 | 92 | 4.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | R-T |
67.5% | 2363 | 71 | 1.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | ▲ 1 | Juju |
64.3% | 4126 | 80 | 2.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | ▼ 1 | Doug |
63.9% | 5591 | 84 | 2.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | – | Starr Nova |
63.9% | 2237 | 71 | 0.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | ▲ 1 | Hank |
63.4% | 3007 | 75 | 1.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | ▼ 1 | Sirius |
63.5% | 2551 | 73 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | – | Shade |
61.2% | 6564 | 87 | 3.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | – | Willow |
61.5% | 1407 | 64 | 0.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 12 | ▲ 2 | Gigi |
62.6% | 899 | 57 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 13 | ▼ 1 | Damian |
61.7% | 1084 | 60 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 14 | ▼ 1 | Ziggy |
62.0% | 887 | 57 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | ▲ 1 | Meeple |
60.4% | 1527 | 65 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 16 | ▼ 1 | Mina |
61.1% | 940 | 58 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | – | Bolt |
60.9% | 859 | 56 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | – | Lumi |
59.3% | 1031 | 59 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | – | Mico |
57.1% | 2842 | 74 | 1.4% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | – | Kaze |
58.0% | 1485 | 64 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | ▲ 1 | Chuck |
57.7% | 1207 | 61 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | ▼ 1 | Stu |
56.6% | 1409 | 64 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | ▲ 4 | Sam |
59.1% | 538 | 49 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | – | Finx |
59.9% | 441 | 46 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | ▼ 2 | Kit |
56.4% | 1357 | 63 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 26 | ▼ 1 | Gray |
58.3% | 617 | 51 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 27 | ▼ 1 | Ash |
55.6% | 1635 | 66 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 28 | ▲ 1 | Bo |
54.9% | 1747 | 67 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 29 | ▼ 1 | Chester |
56.0% | 862 | 56 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 30 | ▲ 5 | Moe |
58.5% | 402 | 45 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 31 | – | Sprout |
56.3% | 741 | 54 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 32 | ▼ 1 | Kenji |
53.1% | 5241 | 83 | 2.3% | Solid | ||
| 33 | ▼ 2 | Ruffs |
57.0% | 509 | 48 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 34 | – | Larry & Lawrie |
53.6% | 2550 | 73 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 35 | ▼ 1 | Bibi |
52.0% | 5712 | 85 | 3.4% | Solid | ||
| 36 | ▲ 2 | Draco |
55.5% | 568 | 50 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 37 | ▲ 6 | Pierce |
55.1% | 643 | 52 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 38 | ▼ 1 | Jacky |
52.6% | 2351 | 71 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 39 | ▼ 4 | Mortis |
52.3% | 1949 | 69 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 40 | – | Surge |
51.1% | 6124 | 86 | 3.0% | Solid | ||
| 41 | ▲ 1 | Alli |
54.6% | 520 | 49 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 42 | ▼ 4 | Amber |
53.1% | 715 | 54 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 43 | – | Najia |
55.1% | 365 | 43 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 44 | ▼ 1 | Barley |
50.7% | 4452 | 81 | 2.1% | Solid | ||
| 45 | ▲ 3 | Glowy |
54.5% | 367 | 44 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 46 | ▼ 1 | Buzz |
50.2% | 1842 | 68 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 47 | – | Cordelius |
49.2% | 1791 | 67 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 48 | ▼ 3 | Jae-Yong |
52.7% | 203 | 35 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 49 | ▲ 2 | Nita |
48.0% | 2956 | 75 | 1.6% | Solid | ||
| 50 | ▲ 2 | Lou |
48.2% | 1995 | 69 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 51 | ▼ 2 | Berry |
47.7% | 3437 | 77 | 1.7% | Rather not | ||
| 52 | ▼ 1 | Meg |
47.6% | 3103 | 75 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | ▲ 1 | Gus |
50.1% | 421 | 46 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | ▼ 1 | Bull |
47.7% | 2185 | 70 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | ▲ 5 | Mandy |
48.0% | 377 | 44 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | ▲ 2 | Janet |
48.9% | 221 | 36 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | ▼ 1 | Lola |
48.2% | 305 | 41 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▲ 1 | Edgar |
45.2% | 7617 | 89 | 4.0% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | ▼ 4 | Angelo |
49.1% | 169 | 32 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | ▼ 3 | Nani |
46.8% | 374 | 44 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | – | Dynamike |
44.1% | 4395 | 81 | 2.5% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | – | Griff |
44.0% | 3060 | 75 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | – | Tick |
43.5% | 6314 | 86 | 3.5% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | – | El Primo |
42.5% | 2562 | 73 | 1.7% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | – | Squeak |
41.5% | 1945 | 68 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▲ 2 | Rosa |
41.1% | 1094 | 60 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▼ 1 | Emz |
40.6% | 4659 | 82 | 2.5% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▼ 1 | Pearl |
41.1% | 898 | 57 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | – | Carl |
40.6% | 1358 | 63 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▲ 1 | Lily |
40.6% | 1136 | 60 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▼ 1 | Spike |
39.3% | 2020 | 69 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▲ 1 | Rico |
39.2% | 2101 | 70 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▼ 1 | Penny |
38.9% | 2268 | 71 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▲ 3 | Sandy |
39.0% | 1101 | 60 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▼ 1 | Max |
38.9% | 984 | 58 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | – | Frank |
38.8% | 2095 | 70 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▼ 2 | Melodie |
38.5% | 805 | 55 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▲ 1 | Pam |
38.5% | 965 | 58 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▲ 2 | Tara |
38.2% | 1182 | 61 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▼ 2 | Shelly |
38.0% | 2011 | 69 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▲ 4 | Fang |
37.6% | 1368 | 63 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▲ 1 | 8-Bit |
37.4% | 2329 | 71 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | – | Belle |
36.6% | 465 | 47 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▼ 3 | Mr. P |
37.1% | 763 | 54 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▲ 1 | Leon |
37.1% | 1032 | 59 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▼ 4 | Brock |
36.9% | 2278 | 71 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▲ 2 | Eve |
35.2% | 508 | 48 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▲ 1 | Otis |
35.9% | 881 | 57 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▼ 2 | Ollie |
34.6% | 382 | 44 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▼ 1 | Gale |
35.8% | 1145 | 61 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | – | Jessie |
35.4% | 2475 | 72 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▲ 1 | Colette |
34.0% | 1135 | 60 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▲ 3 | Buster |
32.8% | 615 | 51 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▲ 1 | Darryl |
33.6% | 1132 | 60 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▼ 1 | Maisie |
32.7% | 636 | 52 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▼ 4 | Grom |
33.1% | 894 | 57 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▲ 2 | Poco |
32.7% | 1938 | 68 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▼ 1 | Bonnie |
30.6% | 445 | 46 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▼ 1 | Piper |
30.9% | 682 | 53 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▲ 3 | Crow |
31.5% | 1844 | 68 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▲ 3 | Bea |
30.2% | 782 | 55 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▼ 2 | Clancy |
29.9% | 746 | 54 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | ▼ 2 | Colt |
30.8% | 1757 | 67 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | ▼ 2 | Charlie |
28.4% | 538 | 49 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Byron |
28.2% | 921 | 57 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Gene |
23.1% | 545 | 49 | 0.3% | Rather not |