
Hot Zone
33,786 battles collected on this map.
TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 48 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
Short rounds Median 77 s out of 77–105 s in this mode. Early pressure pays off — anyone looking to outplay is playing against the map.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 8,580 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 908 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 8,580 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 908 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (413 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Wendy |
70.0% | 2996 | 75 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Trunk |
68.9% | 3294 | 76 | 1.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Nori |
66.4% | 9567 | 92 | 4.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | R-T |
67.4% | 2414 | 72 | 1.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | ▲ 1 | Juju |
64.3% | 4273 | 80 | 2.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | ▼ 1 | Doug |
63.9% | 5759 | 85 | 2.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | ▲ 2 | Hank |
63.3% | 3107 | 75 | 1.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | ▼ 1 | Sirius |
63.6% | 2632 | 73 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | ▼ 1 | Starr Nova |
63.6% | 2295 | 71 | 0.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | – | Shade |
61.4% | 6850 | 87 | 3.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | ▲ 1 | Gigi |
62.7% | 938 | 58 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 12 | ▼ 1 | Willow |
61.4% | 1450 | 64 | 0.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 13 | – | Damian |
61.7% | 1103 | 60 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 14 | – | Ziggy |
61.9% | 907 | 57 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | ▲ 1 | Meeple |
60.2% | 1559 | 65 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 16 | ▼ 1 | Mina |
61.0% | 956 | 58 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | – | Bolt |
60.9% | 887 | 57 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | – | Lumi |
59.3% | 1066 | 59 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | ▲ 1 | Kaze |
58.2% | 1536 | 65 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | ▼ 1 | Mico |
56.9% | 2905 | 74 | 1.3% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | ▲ 1 | Chuck |
57.7% | 1323 | 63 | 0.9% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | ▼ 1 | Stu |
56.7% | 1445 | 64 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | – | Finx |
59.8% | 458 | 47 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | ▲ 1 | Gray |
58.4% | 632 | 52 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | ▲ 3 | Sam |
58.9% | 547 | 49 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 26 | ▼ 2 | Kit |
56.1% | 1384 | 63 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 27 | ▼ 1 | Ash |
55.4% | 1700 | 66 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 28 | ▲ 3 | Sprout |
57.0% | 759 | 54 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 29 | – | Bo |
54.9% | 1802 | 67 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 30 | ▲ 6 | Moe |
58.8% | 415 | 45 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 31 | ▼ 4 | Chester |
56.2% | 901 | 57 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 32 | – | Ruffs |
57.4% | 517 | 49 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 33 | ▼ 3 | Kenji |
53.2% | 5390 | 84 | 2.3% | Solid | ||
| 34 | ▼ 1 | Larry & Lawrie |
53.5% | 2614 | 73 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 35 | ▲ 7 | Pierce |
55.8% | 674 | 53 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 36 | ▲ 2 | Draco |
56.1% | 588 | 51 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 37 | ▼ 3 | Bibi |
51.9% | 5903 | 85 | 3.3% | Solid | ||
| 38 | ▼ 1 | Jacky |
52.5% | 2430 | 72 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 39 | – | Amber |
54.1% | 748 | 54 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 40 | ▼ 5 | Mortis |
52.3% | 2045 | 69 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 41 | ▼ 1 | Surge |
51.1% | 6290 | 86 | 2.9% | Solid | ||
| 42 | ▲ 1 | Alli |
54.4% | 531 | 49 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 43 | ▼ 2 | Barley |
50.8% | 4595 | 81 | 2.1% | Solid | ||
| 44 | – | Najia |
54.4% | 373 | 44 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 45 | ▲ 2 | Glowy |
54.2% | 389 | 44 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 46 | ▼ 1 | Buzz |
50.7% | 1923 | 68 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 47 | ▲ 1 | Cordelius |
49.4% | 1864 | 68 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 48 | ▲ 6 | Gus |
51.5% | 452 | 47 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 49 | ▼ 3 | Jae-Yong |
53.5% | 213 | 35 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 50 | ▼ 1 | Berry |
47.6% | 3557 | 78 | 1.7% | Rather not | ||
| 51 | – | Lou |
48.0% | 2027 | 69 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 52 | ▲ 1 | Bull |
47.9% | 2262 | 71 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | ▼ 3 | Nita |
47.6% | 3043 | 75 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | ▼ 2 | Meg |
47.4% | 3166 | 76 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | ▲ 5 | Mandy |
48.2% | 396 | 45 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | ▼ 1 | Angelo |
49.5% | 182 | 33 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | ▼ 2 | Lola |
48.1% | 310 | 41 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▲ 1 | Edgar |
45.2% | 7845 | 89 | 3.9% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | – | Janet |
48.3% | 230 | 37 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | ▼ 3 | Nani |
47.1% | 384 | 44 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | – | Dynamike |
44.3% | 4539 | 81 | 2.4% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | – | Griff |
44.2% | 3169 | 76 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | – | Tick |
43.4% | 6556 | 87 | 3.5% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | – | El Primo |
42.6% | 2708 | 73 | 1.7% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | – | Squeak |
41.7% | 1995 | 69 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | – | Emz |
40.8% | 4854 | 82 | 2.5% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▲ 1 | Pearl |
41.3% | 935 | 58 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▼ 1 | Rosa |
40.8% | 1144 | 61 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▲ 2 | Lily |
40.7% | 1194 | 61 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▼ 1 | Carl |
40.2% | 1413 | 64 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▼ 1 | Spike |
39.9% | 2139 | 70 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▲ 2 | Penny |
39.3% | 2354 | 71 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▼ 1 | Rico |
39.2% | 2192 | 70 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▼ 1 | Max |
38.9% | 1020 | 59 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▲ 4 | Pam |
38.7% | 991 | 58 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▲ 1 | Sandy |
38.7% | 1144 | 61 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▼ 1 | Frank |
38.6% | 2177 | 70 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▲ 3 | Tara |
38.7% | 1216 | 61 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▼ 4 | Melodie |
38.5% | 841 | 56 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▼ 2 | Shelly |
37.9% | 2082 | 69 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▲ 4 | Fang |
37.6% | 1405 | 64 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▼ 2 | Mr. P |
37.3% | 800 | 55 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▲ 1 | Belle |
36.6% | 475 | 47 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▼ 2 | 8-Bit |
37.1% | 2439 | 72 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▲ 1 | Leon |
37.0% | 1069 | 60 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▼ 3 | Brock |
36.8% | 2345 | 71 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▲ 4 | Eve |
35.5% | 535 | 49 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | – | Otis |
35.8% | 902 | 57 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▲ 1 | Gale |
35.8% | 1175 | 61 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▼ 1 | Jessie |
35.7% | 2560 | 73 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▼ 4 | Ollie |
33.9% | 392 | 45 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▲ 1 | Colette |
34.0% | 1169 | 61 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▲ 1 | Maisie |
33.0% | 664 | 52 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▲ 1 | Buster |
32.6% | 639 | 52 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▼ 2 | Grom |
33.1% | 919 | 57 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▼ 1 | Darryl |
33.3% | 1175 | 61 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▲ 1 | Poco |
32.9% | 2028 | 69 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▼ 1 | Bonnie |
30.1% | 465 | 47 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | – | Piper |
31.1% | 708 | 53 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▲ 3 | Bea |
31.0% | 815 | 55 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▲ 1 | Crow |
31.6% | 1902 | 68 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▼ 2 | Clancy |
29.8% | 772 | 55 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | ▼ 2 | Colt |
30.6% | 1807 | 67 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | – | Charlie |
28.1% | 566 | 50 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Byron |
28.1% | 970 | 58 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Gene |
23.0% | 556 | 50 | 0.3% | Rather not |