
Hot Zone
29,875 battles collected on this map.
TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 48 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
Short rounds Median 77 s out of 77–105 s in this mode. Early pressure pays off — anyone looking to outplay is playing against the map.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 8,404 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 882 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 8,404 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 882 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (427 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Wendy |
70.7% | 2709 | 73 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Trunk |
69.8% | 2914 | 75 | 1.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Nori |
66.4% | 8432 | 90 | 4.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | R-T |
67.7% | 2158 | 70 | 1.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | ▲ 1 | Doug |
64.0% | 5153 | 83 | 2.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | ▼ 1 | Juju |
64.3% | 3841 | 79 | 2.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | ▲ 1 | Sirius |
63.9% | 2348 | 71 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | ▼ 1 | Starr Nova |
64.0% | 2035 | 69 | 0.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | – | Hank |
63.3% | 2804 | 74 | 1.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | – | Shade |
61.2% | 6015 | 85 | 3.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | – | Damian |
62.4% | 999 | 59 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 12 | ▲ 1 | Willow |
61.5% | 1282 | 62 | 0.9% | Good pick | ||
| 13 | ▼ 1 | Ziggy |
62.5% | 807 | 55 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 14 | – | Meeple |
60.4% | 1420 | 64 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | ▲ 1 | Gigi |
61.8% | 830 | 56 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 16 | ▼ 1 | Mina |
61.3% | 871 | 56 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | – | Bolt |
61.1% | 778 | 55 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | – | Lumi |
59.6% | 964 | 58 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | – | Mico |
57.3% | 2613 | 73 | 1.4% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | – | Kaze |
57.1% | 1326 | 63 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | ▼ 1 | Chuck |
57.5% | 1041 | 59 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | ▲ 1 | Stu |
57.0% | 1310 | 63 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | ▲ 1 | Finx |
60.6% | 409 | 45 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | ▼ 1 | Kit |
56.7% | 1260 | 62 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | ▲ 1 | Ash |
55.7% | 1482 | 64 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 26 | ▼ 1 | Gray |
58.0% | 572 | 50 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 27 | ▲ 1 | Sam |
58.3% | 463 | 47 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 28 | ▼ 1 | Chester |
56.2% | 797 | 55 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 29 | – | Kenji |
53.3% | 4896 | 82 | 2.4% | Solid | ||
| 30 | ▲ 1 | Ruffs |
57.4% | 484 | 48 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 31 | – | Bo |
54.4% | 1613 | 66 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 32 | ▲ 1 | Larry & Lawrie |
53.7% | 2362 | 71 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 33 | ▼ 2 | Sprout |
56.0% | 679 | 53 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 34 | ▲ 1 | Jacky |
52.8% | 2155 | 70 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 35 | ▼ 1 | Bibi |
51.9% | 5134 | 83 | 3.4% | Solid | ||
| 36 | ▲ 1 | Moe |
57.0% | 358 | 43 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 37 | ▼ 1 | Mortis |
52.4% | 1779 | 67 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 38 | ▲ 6 | Pierce |
54.5% | 591 | 51 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 39 | ▼ 1 | Draco |
54.8% | 526 | 49 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 40 | ▼ 1 | Surge |
51.2% | 5643 | 84 | 3.0% | Solid | ||
| 41 | ▼ 1 | Amber |
53.9% | 651 | 52 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 42 | ▼ 1 | Alli |
54.2% | 463 | 47 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 43 | ▼ 1 | Barley |
50.5% | 4094 | 80 | 2.1% | Solid | ||
| 44 | ▼ 1 | Najia |
54.5% | 336 | 42 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 45 | – | Buzz |
49.8% | 1660 | 66 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 46 | – | Glowy |
52.4% | 311 | 41 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 47 | – | Jae-Yong |
53.8% | 171 | 32 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 48 | ▲ 1 | Cordelius |
48.6% | 1585 | 65 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 49 | ▼ 1 | Berry |
47.9% | 3170 | 76 | 1.7% | Solid | ||
| 50 | – | Lou |
48.3% | 1858 | 68 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 51 | – | Meg |
47.8% | 2961 | 75 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 52 | ▲ 1 | Gus |
50.3% | 388 | 44 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | ▲ 1 | Bull |
47.9% | 1998 | 69 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | ▼ 1 | Nita |
47.6% | 2691 | 73 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | ▼ 1 | Angelo |
51.6% | 155 | 31 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | – | Lola |
48.7% | 277 | 39 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | – | Janet |
48.7% | 199 | 34 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▲ 2 | Mandy |
47.6% | 349 | 43 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | – | Edgar |
44.8% | 6973 | 88 | 4.0% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | ▼ 2 | Nani |
46.7% | 349 | 43 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | – | Dynamike |
44.1% | 3982 | 79 | 2.4% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | – | Griff |
44.1% | 2843 | 74 | 1.7% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | – | Tick |
43.3% | 5731 | 85 | 3.4% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | – | El Primo |
41.8% | 2256 | 71 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | – | Squeak |
41.3% | 1754 | 67 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▲ 2 | Rosa |
41.1% | 985 | 58 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▼ 1 | Emz |
40.5% | 4243 | 80 | 2.5% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▼ 1 | Pearl |
40.7% | 823 | 56 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | – | Carl |
40.5% | 1236 | 62 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | – | Lily |
40.1% | 1011 | 59 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | – | Rico |
39.5% | 1917 | 68 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | – | Spike |
39.1% | 1792 | 67 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▲ 1 | Penny |
38.9% | 2069 | 69 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▼ 2 | Max |
38.5% | 892 | 57 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▲ 1 | Frank |
38.5% | 1913 | 68 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | – | Melodie |
38.3% | 746 | 54 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▲ 1 | Pam |
38.0% | 887 | 57 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▲ 2 | Belle |
37.1% | 431 | 46 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▼ 1 | Shelly |
37.9% | 1820 | 67 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▼ 1 | Sandy |
37.7% | 979 | 58 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▲ 2 | Tara |
37.6% | 1095 | 60 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▲ 3 | Fang |
37.5% | 1274 | 62 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▼ 1 | 8-Bit |
37.5% | 2115 | 70 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▼ 4 | Brock |
37.5% | 2093 | 70 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▼ 1 | Mr. P |
36.8% | 703 | 53 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | – | Leon |
36.6% | 955 | 58 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | – | Ollie |
34.8% | 351 | 43 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▲ 1 | Gale |
35.6% | 1064 | 59 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▼ 1 | Otis |
35.3% | 800 | 55 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | – | Eve |
34.3% | 467 | 47 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | – | Jessie |
35.2% | 2258 | 71 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | – | Grom |
33.7% | 833 | 56 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | – | Colette |
33.7% | 1032 | 59 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | – | Maisie |
32.8% | 583 | 50 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▲ 1 | Darryl |
33.2% | 1017 | 59 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▼ 1 | Bonnie |
31.2% | 401 | 45 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▲ 2 | Poco |
32.4% | 1767 | 67 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▼ 1 | Buster |
30.7% | 527 | 49 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▼ 1 | Piper |
30.5% | 604 | 51 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | – | Colt |
31.7% | 1633 | 66 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▲ 1 | Clancy |
30.3% | 673 | 53 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▲ 1 | Crow |
31.1% | 1681 | 66 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | ▼ 2 | Charlie |
28.7% | 474 | 47 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | – | Bea |
29.6% | 720 | 54 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Byron |
28.2% | 826 | 56 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Gene |
23.3% | 502 | 48 | 0.3% | Rather not |