
Hot Zone
29,237 battles collected on this map.
TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 47 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
Short rounds Median 77 s out of 77–105 s in this mode. Early pressure pays off — anyone looking to outplay is playing against the map.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 8,404 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 877 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 8,404 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 877 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (425 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Wendy |
71.0% | 2654 | 73 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Trunk |
70.1% | 2834 | 74 | 1.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Nori |
66.4% | 8217 | 90 | 4.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | R-T |
67.7% | 2130 | 70 | 1.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | – | Juju |
64.2% | 3779 | 78 | 2.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | – | Doug |
63.8% | 5045 | 83 | 2.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | – | Sirius |
64.1% | 2296 | 71 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | – | Starr Nova |
64.1% | 2005 | 69 | 0.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | – | Hank |
63.3% | 2760 | 74 | 1.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | – | Shade |
61.2% | 5845 | 85 | 3.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | – | Damian |
62.3% | 975 | 58 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 12 | ▲ 1 | Willow |
61.5% | 1242 | 62 | 0.9% | Good pick | ||
| 13 | ▼ 1 | Ziggy |
62.6% | 791 | 55 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 14 | ▲ 2 | Gigi |
62.0% | 815 | 55 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | ▼ 1 | Meeple |
60.4% | 1405 | 64 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 16 | ▼ 1 | Mina |
61.5% | 858 | 56 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | – | Bolt |
60.8% | 765 | 55 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | – | Lumi |
59.7% | 948 | 58 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | – | Mico |
57.4% | 2566 | 73 | 1.4% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | ▲ 2 | Chuck |
57.8% | 1013 | 59 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | ▼ 1 | Kaze |
57.2% | 1297 | 62 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | ▼ 1 | Stu |
57.1% | 1274 | 62 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | – | Kit |
56.7% | 1234 | 62 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | – | Finx |
60.2% | 397 | 45 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | – | Ash |
56.0% | 1451 | 64 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 26 | – | Gray |
57.8% | 566 | 50 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 27 | ▲ 2 | Sam |
58.3% | 456 | 47 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 28 | ▲ 3 | Ruffs |
58.1% | 473 | 47 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 29 | ▼ 2 | Chester |
56.4% | 789 | 55 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 30 | ▼ 2 | Bo |
54.6% | 1592 | 65 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 31 | ▲ 1 | Kenji |
53.1% | 4783 | 82 | 2.4% | Solid | ||
| 32 | ▼ 3 | Sprout |
55.9% | 665 | 52 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 33 | ▲ 1 | Larry & Lawrie |
53.6% | 2307 | 71 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 34 | – | Bibi |
52.1% | 5003 | 83 | 3.4% | Solid | ||
| 35 | ▲ 1 | Jacky |
52.7% | 2097 | 70 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 36 | ▼ 1 | Moe |
56.8% | 354 | 43 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 37 | ▲ 2 | Draco |
54.9% | 517 | 49 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 38 | ▲ 5 | Pierce |
54.5% | 587 | 51 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 39 | ▼ 1 | Surge |
51.2% | 5516 | 84 | 3.0% | Solid | ||
| 40 | ▼ 3 | Mortis |
52.1% | 1735 | 67 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 41 | – | Amber |
53.7% | 639 | 52 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 42 | ▼ 2 | Alli |
54.5% | 451 | 47 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 43 | ▼ 2 | Najia |
54.9% | 328 | 42 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 44 | ▲ 1 | Barley |
50.3% | 4000 | 79 | 2.1% | Solid | ||
| 45 | – | Buzz |
49.8% | 1629 | 66 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 46 | – | Jae-Yong |
55.1% | 167 | 32 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 47 | – | Glowy |
51.8% | 303 | 41 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 48 | – | Berry |
48.1% | 3104 | 75 | 1.7% | Solid | ||
| 49 | – | Cordelius |
48.6% | 1546 | 65 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 50 | – | Lou |
48.4% | 1840 | 68 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 51 | – | Meg |
47.8% | 2930 | 75 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 52 | ▲ 1 | Bull |
47.9% | 1947 | 68 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | ▼ 1 | Nita |
47.4% | 2632 | 73 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | ▲ 1 | Gus |
49.7% | 378 | 44 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | ▼ 1 | Angelo |
52.0% | 152 | 30 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | – | Lola |
49.1% | 273 | 39 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | – | Janet |
48.5% | 196 | 34 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▲ 1 | Edgar |
44.7% | 6859 | 87 | 4.2% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | ▼ 1 | Nani |
47.1% | 342 | 42 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | – | Mandy |
46.4% | 336 | 42 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | – | Dynamike |
44.2% | 3890 | 79 | 2.5% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | – | Griff |
44.1% | 2780 | 74 | 1.7% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | – | Tick |
43.3% | 5588 | 84 | 3.4% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | – | El Primo |
41.5% | 2207 | 70 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | – | Squeak |
41.2% | 1714 | 67 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | – | Emz |
40.5% | 4163 | 80 | 2.6% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▲ 2 | Rosa |
40.9% | 968 | 58 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | – | Carl |
40.5% | 1193 | 61 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▼ 2 | Pearl |
40.5% | 803 | 55 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▲ 3 | Rico |
39.5% | 1884 | 68 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | – | Max |
39.6% | 862 | 56 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▼ 2 | Lily |
39.5% | 980 | 58 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▼ 1 | Spike |
39.3% | 1738 | 67 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | – | Penny |
39.0% | 2022 | 69 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | – | Melodie |
38.3% | 725 | 54 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | – | Frank |
38.3% | 1878 | 68 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | – | Shelly |
38.1% | 1781 | 67 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | – | Pam |
38.0% | 876 | 57 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | – | Sandy |
37.9% | 959 | 58 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | – | Belle |
37.1% | 426 | 46 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▲ 1 | Tara |
37.6% | 1076 | 60 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▼ 1 | Brock |
37.5% | 2064 | 69 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▲ 2 | Fang |
37.4% | 1249 | 62 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▼ 1 | 8-Bit |
37.3% | 2073 | 69 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▼ 1 | Mr. P |
36.6% | 696 | 53 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | – | Leon |
36.5% | 935 | 58 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▲ 1 | Gale |
35.9% | 1041 | 59 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▲ 1 | Otis |
35.7% | 779 | 55 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▼ 2 | Ollie |
34.0% | 338 | 42 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | – | Eve |
34.4% | 453 | 47 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | – | Jessie |
35.1% | 2204 | 70 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | – | Grom |
33.8% | 813 | 55 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▲ 1 | Maisie |
32.9% | 568 | 50 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▼ 1 | Colette |
33.3% | 1018 | 59 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▲ 1 | Darryl |
33.0% | 996 | 58 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▼ 1 | Bonnie |
30.9% | 395 | 45 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | – | Buster |
30.7% | 515 | 49 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▲ 2 | Poco |
32.0% | 1722 | 67 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▼ 1 | Colt |
31.8% | 1611 | 66 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▼ 1 | Clancy |
30.4% | 655 | 52 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▲ 1 | Charlie |
29.3% | 464 | 47 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▼ 1 | Piper |
29.9% | 589 | 51 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | ▲ 1 | Bea |
29.8% | 699 | 53 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | ▼ 1 | Crow |
30.8% | 1644 | 66 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Byron |
27.9% | 807 | 55 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Gene |
23.3% | 493 | 48 | 0.3% | Rather not |