
Hot Zone
27,523 battles collected on this map.
TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 47 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
Short rounds Median 77 s out of 77–105 s in this mode. Early pressure pays off — anyone looking to outplay is playing against the map.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 7,666 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 863 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 7,666 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 863 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (389 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Wendy |
71.0% | 2552 | 73 | 1.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Trunk |
70.1% | 2670 | 73 | 1.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Nori |
66.5% | 7799 | 89 | 4.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | R-T |
67.7% | 2029 | 69 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | – | Doug |
64.2% | 4770 | 82 | 2.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | – | Juju |
64.1% | 3541 | 77 | 2.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | – | Starr Nova |
64.1% | 1935 | 68 | 0.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | – | Sirius |
63.8% | 2181 | 70 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | – | Hank |
63.2% | 2600 | 73 | 1.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | – | Shade |
61.2% | 5495 | 84 | 3.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | – | Ziggy |
63.3% | 736 | 54 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 12 | – | Damian |
62.2% | 913 | 57 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 13 | – | Mina |
62.1% | 812 | 55 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 14 | – | Meeple |
60.5% | 1341 | 63 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | – | Willow |
60.9% | 1109 | 60 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 16 | – | Gigi |
62.1% | 731 | 54 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | – | Bolt |
61.3% | 726 | 54 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | – | Lumi |
59.7% | 890 | 57 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | – | Mico |
57.4% | 2424 | 72 | 1.4% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | – | Kaze |
57.7% | 1233 | 62 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | – | Stu |
57.1% | 1226 | 62 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | – | Chuck |
57.4% | 939 | 58 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | – | Kit |
57.0% | 1120 | 60 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | – | Finx |
60.2% | 384 | 44 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | – | Ash |
55.7% | 1371 | 63 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 26 | – | Gray |
58.1% | 528 | 49 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 27 | – | Chester |
56.7% | 729 | 54 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 28 | – | Sam |
58.1% | 434 | 46 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 29 | – | Kenji |
53.3% | 4520 | 81 | 2.2% | Solid | ||
| 30 | – | Bo |
54.5% | 1478 | 64 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 31 | – | Ruffs |
57.6% | 443 | 46 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 32 | – | Larry & Lawrie |
53.4% | 2176 | 70 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 33 | – | Sprout |
55.7% | 637 | 52 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 34 | – | Bibi |
52.1% | 4681 | 82 | 3.5% | Solid | ||
| 35 | – | Jacky |
52.8% | 1948 | 68 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 36 | – | Draco |
55.7% | 481 | 48 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 37 | – | Moe |
57.0% | 330 | 42 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 38 | – | Mortis |
52.4% | 1638 | 66 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 39 | – | Surge |
51.0% | 5197 | 83 | 2.9% | Solid | ||
| 40 | ▲ 1 | Alli |
54.7% | 426 | 46 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 41 | ▼ 1 | Najia |
55.8% | 310 | 41 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 42 | – | Amber |
53.3% | 595 | 51 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 43 | – | Barley |
50.3% | 3790 | 78 | 2.1% | Solid | ||
| 44 | – | Pierce |
53.0% | 538 | 49 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 45 | – | Buzz |
49.9% | 1544 | 65 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 46 | – | Jae-Yong |
55.6% | 162 | 31 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 47 | – | Lou |
48.6% | 1766 | 67 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 48 | – | Meg |
48.1% | 2830 | 74 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 49 | – | Glowy |
51.5% | 293 | 40 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 50 | – | Berry |
48.0% | 2959 | 75 | 1.9% | Solid | ||
| 51 | – | Cordelius |
48.0% | 1430 | 64 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 52 | – | Angelo |
52.7% | 146 | 30 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | – | Nita |
47.4% | 2470 | 72 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | – | Bull |
47.4% | 1815 | 67 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | – | Janet |
49.7% | 185 | 33 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | – | Lola |
48.8% | 252 | 38 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | – | Gus |
47.9% | 351 | 43 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | – | Nani |
47.8% | 316 | 41 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | – | Edgar |
44.5% | 6443 | 86 | 4.3% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | – | Mandy |
46.4% | 319 | 41 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | – | Dynamike |
44.1% | 3625 | 78 | 2.4% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | – | Griff |
44.1% | 2654 | 73 | 1.9% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | – | Tick |
43.4% | 5245 | 83 | 3.4% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | – | Squeak |
41.9% | 1599 | 66 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | – | El Primo |
41.5% | 2042 | 69 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | – | Emz |
40.5% | 3914 | 79 | 2.7% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | – | Pearl |
40.5% | 755 | 54 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | – | Rosa |
40.4% | 914 | 57 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | – | Carl |
40.3% | 1130 | 60 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | – | Spike |
39.4% | 1639 | 66 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | – | Rico |
39.3% | 1759 | 67 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | – | Penny |
39.2% | 1907 | 68 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | – | Lily |
39.1% | 913 | 57 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | – | Max |
38.9% | 799 | 55 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | – | Shelly |
38.6% | 1665 | 66 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | – | Pam |
38.5% | 820 | 56 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | – | Melodie |
38.4% | 670 | 53 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | – | Frank |
38.2% | 1787 | 67 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | – | 8-Bit |
37.8% | 1950 | 69 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | – | Sandy |
37.1% | 891 | 57 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | – | Brock |
37.1% | 1921 | 68 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | – | Mr. P |
36.7% | 652 | 52 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | – | Fang |
36.9% | 1180 | 61 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | – | Ollie |
35.3% | 312 | 41 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | – | Tara |
36.8% | 995 | 58 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | – | Belle |
35.6% | 396 | 45 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | – | Leon |
36.2% | 879 | 57 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | – | Gale |
35.7% | 983 | 58 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | – | Otis |
35.4% | 741 | 54 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | – | Eve |
33.8% | 429 | 46 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | – | Jessie |
34.8% | 2081 | 69 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | – | Maisie |
32.8% | 534 | 49 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▲ 2 | Grom |
33.3% | 759 | 54 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▼ 1 | Bonnie |
31.6% | 367 | 44 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▼ 1 | Colette |
33.5% | 974 | 58 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | – | Darryl |
33.1% | 937 | 58 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | – | Buster |
30.9% | 482 | 48 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | – | Clancy |
30.7% | 616 | 51 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▲ 1 | Poco |
31.9% | 1618 | 66 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▼ 1 | Colt |
31.8% | 1521 | 65 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▲ 1 | Piper |
30.3% | 555 | 50 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▼ 1 | Charlie |
29.3% | 437 | 46 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | – | Crow |
31.0% | 1539 | 65 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | – | Bea |
29.7% | 643 | 52 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Byron |
28.4% | 758 | 54 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Gene |
22.8% | 464 | 47 | 0.3% | Rather not |