
Hot Zone
28,550 battles collected on this map.
TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 47 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
Short rounds Median 77 s out of 77–105 s in this mode. Early pressure pays off — anyone looking to outplay is playing against the map.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 7,724 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 872 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 7,724 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 872 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (354 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Wendy |
71.1% | 2613 | 73 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Trunk |
70.2% | 2758 | 74 | 1.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Nori |
66.4% | 8083 | 90 | 4.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | R-T |
67.7% | 2083 | 70 | 1.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | – | Doug |
63.9% | 4924 | 82 | 2.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | – | Juju |
64.1% | 3679 | 78 | 2.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | ▲ 1 | Starr Nova |
64.2% | 1971 | 69 | 0.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | ▼ 1 | Sirius |
64.0% | 2261 | 71 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | – | Hank |
63.2% | 2702 | 73 | 1.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | – | Shade |
61.2% | 5692 | 85 | 3.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | – | Damian |
62.4% | 958 | 58 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 12 | – | Ziggy |
62.8% | 776 | 55 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 13 | ▲ 1 | Willow |
61.3% | 1199 | 61 | 0.9% | Good pick | ||
| 14 | ▼ 1 | Meeple |
60.6% | 1372 | 63 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | – | Gigi |
62.1% | 791 | 55 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 16 | – | Mina |
61.7% | 838 | 56 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | – | Bolt |
60.7% | 754 | 54 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | – | Lumi |
59.7% | 927 | 57 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | – | Mico |
57.2% | 2516 | 72 | 1.4% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | – | Kaze |
57.4% | 1274 | 62 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | ▲ 1 | Chuck |
57.7% | 986 | 58 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | ▼ 1 | Stu |
57.1% | 1251 | 62 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | – | Kit |
56.6% | 1154 | 61 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | – | Finx |
60.2% | 394 | 45 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | – | Gray |
58.1% | 549 | 50 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 26 | – | Ash |
55.6% | 1416 | 64 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 27 | – | Chester |
56.7% | 774 | 55 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 28 | – | Bo |
55.0% | 1530 | 65 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 29 | ▲ 1 | Ruffs |
58.1% | 463 | 47 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 30 | ▼ 1 | Sam |
58.1% | 451 | 47 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 31 | – | Kenji |
53.3% | 4663 | 82 | 2.2% | Solid | ||
| 32 | – | Sprout |
56.2% | 653 | 52 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 33 | – | Larry & Lawrie |
53.6% | 2252 | 71 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 34 | – | Bibi |
52.0% | 4877 | 82 | 3.4% | Solid | ||
| 35 | – | Jacky |
52.8% | 2034 | 69 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 36 | ▲ 1 | Moe |
56.8% | 340 | 42 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 37 | ▲ 1 | Alli |
55.3% | 441 | 46 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 38 | ▼ 1 | Mortis |
52.4% | 1707 | 67 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 39 | ▼ 1 | Draco |
54.9% | 499 | 48 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 40 | ▲ 2 | Pierce |
54.2% | 577 | 50 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 41 | – | Surge |
51.1% | 5388 | 84 | 3.0% | Solid | ||
| 42 | ▼ 1 | Amber |
53.3% | 625 | 51 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 43 | ▼ 1 | Najia |
55.2% | 317 | 41 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 44 | – | Barley |
50.2% | 3908 | 79 | 2.0% | Solid | ||
| 45 | – | Buzz |
49.8% | 1585 | 65 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 46 | – | Jae-Yong |
55.4% | 166 | 32 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 47 | ▲ 1 | Lou |
48.5% | 1818 | 67 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 48 | ▲ 1 | Glowy |
51.5% | 299 | 40 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 49 | ▼ 2 | Berry |
47.9% | 3029 | 75 | 1.7% | Solid | ||
| 50 | – | Meg |
47.9% | 2886 | 74 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 51 | – | Cordelius |
48.4% | 1497 | 65 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 52 | ▲ 1 | Angelo |
53.0% | 149 | 30 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | – | Nita |
47.5% | 2564 | 73 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | ▼ 1 | Bull |
47.7% | 1901 | 68 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | – | Gus |
49.3% | 369 | 44 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | ▲ 2 | Lola |
49.0% | 261 | 38 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | ▼ 1 | Janet |
49.2% | 191 | 34 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▼ 1 | Nani |
47.9% | 328 | 42 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | – | Edgar |
44.7% | 6698 | 87 | 4.2% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | – | Dynamike |
44.2% | 3796 | 78 | 2.5% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | – | Mandy |
45.9% | 327 | 42 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | – | Griff |
44.2% | 2732 | 74 | 1.7% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | – | Tick |
43.4% | 5452 | 84 | 3.4% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | – | El Primo |
41.5% | 2139 | 70 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | – | Squeak |
41.6% | 1663 | 66 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | – | Emz |
40.5% | 4059 | 79 | 2.6% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | – | Carl |
40.4% | 1178 | 61 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | – | Rosa |
40.3% | 942 | 58 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | – | Pearl |
40.3% | 785 | 55 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | – | Max |
39.7% | 836 | 56 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | – | Rico |
39.5% | 1836 | 68 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | – | Spike |
39.4% | 1691 | 66 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▲ 1 | Lily |
39.4% | 949 | 58 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▼ 1 | Penny |
39.2% | 1982 | 69 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▲ 2 | Melodie |
38.5% | 711 | 53 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▼ 1 | Pam |
38.6% | 853 | 56 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▲ 1 | Frank |
38.4% | 1854 | 68 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▼ 2 | Shelly |
38.3% | 1740 | 67 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▲ 1 | Brock |
37.7% | 2024 | 69 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▼ 1 | Sandy |
37.6% | 942 | 58 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | – | 8-Bit |
37.5% | 2037 | 69 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | – | Belle |
36.4% | 415 | 45 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▲ 1 | Mr. P |
37.0% | 676 | 53 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▼ 1 | Tara |
37.1% | 1035 | 59 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | – | Fang |
37.0% | 1219 | 61 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | – | Ollie |
34.5% | 330 | 42 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | – | Leon |
36.1% | 914 | 57 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | – | Otis |
35.9% | 767 | 55 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | – | Gale |
35.7% | 1018 | 59 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | – | Jessie |
35.1% | 2154 | 70 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | – | Eve |
33.2% | 437 | 46 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | – | Colette |
33.3% | 1002 | 59 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▲ 1 | Maisie |
32.4% | 553 | 50 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▼ 1 | Grom |
33.0% | 786 | 55 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▲ 1 | Darryl |
33.1% | 970 | 58 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▼ 1 | Bonnie |
30.8% | 386 | 44 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | – | Buster |
30.7% | 495 | 48 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▲ 1 | Clancy |
30.7% | 635 | 52 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▲ 1 | Poco |
31.8% | 1680 | 66 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▼ 2 | Colt |
31.8% | 1570 | 65 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | – | Piper |
30.3% | 571 | 50 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | – | Charlie |
29.1% | 454 | 47 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | – | Crow |
30.9% | 1607 | 66 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | – | Bea |
29.2% | 668 | 52 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Byron |
28.2% | 784 | 55 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Gene |
22.9% | 485 | 48 | 0.3% | Rather not |