
Hot Zone
30,784 battles collected on this map.
MEDIUM — an average amount of choice: 50 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
Short rounds Median 77 s out of 77–105 s in this mode. Early pressure pays off — anyone looking to outplay is playing against the map.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 8,738 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 886 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 8,738 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 886 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (437 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Wendy |
70.7% | 2769 | 74 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Trunk |
69.8% | 3012 | 75 | 1.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Nori |
66.3% | 8678 | 91 | 4.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | R-T |
67.5% | 2219 | 70 | 1.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | – | Juju |
64.3% | 3935 | 79 | 2.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | – | Doug |
63.9% | 5277 | 83 | 2.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | – | Sirius |
64.0% | 2415 | 72 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | – | Starr Nova |
64.0% | 2110 | 70 | 0.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | – | Hank |
63.4% | 2868 | 74 | 1.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | – | Shade |
61.0% | 6169 | 86 | 3.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | – | Damian |
62.4% | 1021 | 59 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 12 | ▲ 1 | Willow |
61.6% | 1327 | 63 | 0.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 13 | ▲ 1 | Gigi |
62.5% | 861 | 56 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 14 | ▼ 2 | Ziggy |
62.1% | 818 | 56 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | ▲ 1 | Meeple |
60.2% | 1459 | 64 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 16 | ▲ 1 | Bolt |
61.4% | 809 | 55 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | ▼ 2 | Mina |
61.1% | 889 | 57 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | – | Lumi |
59.8% | 990 | 58 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | – | Mico |
57.2% | 2682 | 73 | 1.4% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | ▲ 1 | Kaze |
57.7% | 1386 | 63 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | ▼ 1 | Chuck |
58.0% | 1094 | 60 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | – | Stu |
57.1% | 1347 | 63 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | ▲ 1 | Finx |
60.1% | 421 | 46 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | ▼ 1 | Kit |
56.5% | 1286 | 62 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | ▲ 2 | Sam |
59.1% | 501 | 48 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 26 | ▼ 1 | Gray |
58.3% | 580 | 50 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 27 | ▼ 1 | Ash |
55.1% | 1536 | 65 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 28 | – | Chester |
56.0% | 814 | 55 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 29 | ▲ 3 | Ruffs |
57.4% | 493 | 48 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 30 | ▼ 2 | Bo |
54.4% | 1650 | 66 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 31 | – | Kenji |
53.1% | 4997 | 83 | 2.3% | Solid | ||
| 32 | ▼ 1 | Sprout |
56.1% | 694 | 53 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 33 | – | Larry & Lawrie |
53.5% | 2421 | 72 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 34 | – | Moe |
58.0% | 367 | 44 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 35 | ▲ 8 | Pierce |
55.4% | 608 | 51 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 36 | ▼ 1 | Bibi |
51.9% | 5327 | 84 | 3.4% | Solid | ||
| 37 | – | Jacky |
52.5% | 2217 | 70 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 38 | ▲ 1 | Amber |
54.6% | 667 | 52 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 39 | ▼ 3 | Mortis |
52.5% | 1845 | 68 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 40 | ▼ 2 | Surge |
51.1% | 5764 | 85 | 2.9% | Solid | ||
| 41 | ▲ 1 | Alli |
54.7% | 492 | 48 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 42 | ▼ 2 | Draco |
54.3% | 540 | 49 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 43 | ▼ 2 | Barley |
50.5% | 4191 | 80 | 2.1% | Solid | ||
| 44 | – | Najia |
54.7% | 342 | 42 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 45 | – | Buzz |
50.4% | 1735 | 67 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 46 | ▲ 1 | Glowy |
53.0% | 334 | 42 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 47 | ▼ 1 | Jae-Yong |
54.4% | 182 | 33 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 48 | – | Cordelius |
48.7% | 1640 | 66 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 49 | ▲ 4 | Gus |
50.7% | 400 | 45 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 50 | – | Berry |
48.0% | 3257 | 76 | 1.7% | Solid | ||
| 51 | ▼ 1 | Lou |
48.3% | 1899 | 68 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 52 | – | Nita |
47.9% | 2796 | 74 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | ▼ 2 | Meg |
47.7% | 2997 | 75 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | ▼ 1 | Bull |
47.8% | 2063 | 69 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | – | Angelo |
51.2% | 160 | 31 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | ▲ 1 | Janet |
50.0% | 210 | 35 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | ▲ 2 | Mandy |
48.6% | 356 | 43 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▼ 2 | Lola |
48.4% | 283 | 40 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | ▲ 1 | Edgar |
44.8% | 7178 | 88 | 4.0% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | ▼ 2 | Nani |
46.8% | 357 | 43 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | – | Dynamike |
44.0% | 4121 | 80 | 2.5% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | – | Griff |
44.2% | 2913 | 75 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | – | Tick |
43.3% | 5960 | 85 | 3.6% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | – | El Primo |
42.5% | 2375 | 71 | 1.7% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | – | Squeak |
41.3% | 1808 | 67 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▲ 4 | Lily |
41.0% | 1067 | 59 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▲ 1 | Rosa |
40.8% | 1019 | 59 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▼ 1 | Emz |
40.3% | 4371 | 81 | 2.5% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▼ 1 | Carl |
40.6% | 1275 | 62 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▼ 3 | Pearl |
40.6% | 844 | 56 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▲ 1 | Rico |
39.4% | 1970 | 69 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▼ 1 | Spike |
39.4% | 1867 | 68 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | – | Penny |
39.0% | 2131 | 70 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | – | Max |
38.8% | 934 | 58 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | – | Frank |
38.5% | 1983 | 69 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | – | Pam |
38.3% | 913 | 57 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▲ 2 | Sandy |
38.2% | 1025 | 59 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▼ 1 | Melodie |
38.0% | 765 | 55 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▲ 1 | Belle |
37.2% | 441 | 46 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▼ 2 | Shelly |
37.7% | 1882 | 68 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▲ 2 | Tara |
37.7% | 1125 | 60 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▲ 2 | Fang |
37.4% | 1309 | 63 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▼ 2 | 8-Bit |
37.4% | 2192 | 70 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▼ 2 | Brock |
37.4% | 2163 | 70 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | – | Mr. P |
36.8% | 718 | 54 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | – | Leon |
36.9% | 972 | 58 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | – | Ollie |
35.1% | 359 | 43 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▲ 2 | Eve |
35.5% | 487 | 48 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▼ 1 | Otis |
35.2% | 833 | 56 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▼ 1 | Gale |
35.3% | 1090 | 60 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | – | Jessie |
35.2% | 2339 | 71 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▲ 2 | Colette |
34.3% | 1064 | 59 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▲ 2 | Buster |
32.9% | 569 | 50 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▼ 1 | Maisie |
32.9% | 604 | 51 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▼ 3 | Grom |
33.4% | 856 | 56 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | – | Bonnie |
31.6% | 412 | 45 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | – | Darryl |
33.1% | 1052 | 59 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | – | Poco |
32.5% | 1819 | 67 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▲ 1 | Colt |
31.5% | 1672 | 66 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▼ 1 | Piper |
30.2% | 623 | 51 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▲ 1 | Crow |
31.2% | 1732 | 67 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▼ 1 | Charlie |
28.9% | 498 | 48 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | – | Clancy |
29.8% | 702 | 53 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | – | Bea |
29.5% | 748 | 54 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Byron |
27.9% | 853 | 56 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Gene |
23.0% | 514 | 49 | 0.3% | Rather not |