
Hot Zone
34,768 battles collected on this map.
TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 49 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
Short rounds Median 77 s out of 77–105 s in this mode. Early pressure pays off — anyone looking to outplay is playing against the map.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 8,669 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 916 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 8,669 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 916 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (407 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Wendy |
70.0% | 3058 | 75 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Trunk |
68.7% | 3366 | 77 | 1.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Nori |
66.3% | 9784 | 93 | 4.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | R-T |
67.3% | 2468 | 72 | 1.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | – | Juju |
64.4% | 4376 | 81 | 2.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | – | Doug |
63.9% | 5903 | 85 | 2.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | ▲ 2 | Hank |
63.4% | 3172 | 76 | 1.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | ▼ 1 | Sirius |
63.6% | 2689 | 73 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | ▼ 1 | Starr Nova |
63.8% | 2348 | 71 | 0.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | – | Shade |
61.5% | 7127 | 88 | 3.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | ▲ 3 | Gigi |
63.0% | 961 | 58 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 12 | – | Willow |
61.3% | 1487 | 64 | 0.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 13 | ▼ 2 | Ziggy |
62.3% | 924 | 57 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 14 | ▼ 1 | Damian |
61.7% | 1130 | 60 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | ▲ 1 | Meeple |
60.4% | 1592 | 65 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 16 | ▼ 1 | Mina |
60.8% | 982 | 58 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | – | Bolt |
60.8% | 909 | 57 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | – | Lumi |
59.3% | 1097 | 60 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | ▲ 1 | Kaze |
58.3% | 1574 | 65 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | ▲ 1 | Chuck |
58.4% | 1417 | 64 | 1.0% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | ▼ 2 | Mico |
56.7% | 2979 | 75 | 1.3% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | ▲ 6 | Sam |
60.0% | 578 | 50 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | ▼ 1 | Stu |
57.2% | 1484 | 64 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | ▲ 1 | Gray |
58.5% | 655 | 52 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | ▼ 2 | Finx |
59.7% | 476 | 47 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 26 | ▼ 2 | Kit |
55.8% | 1411 | 64 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 27 | ▲ 3 | Bo |
55.1% | 1851 | 68 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 28 | ▲ 3 | Ruffs |
58.0% | 533 | 49 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 29 | ▼ 3 | Ash |
55.0% | 1739 | 67 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 30 | ▼ 3 | Chester |
56.2% | 936 | 58 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 31 | ▲ 1 | Sprout |
56.7% | 773 | 55 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 32 | ▲ 4 | Moe |
58.7% | 421 | 46 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 33 | ▼ 4 | Kenji |
53.1% | 5505 | 84 | 2.3% | Solid | ||
| 34 | ▼ 1 | Larry & Lawrie |
53.5% | 2698 | 73 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 35 | ▲ 7 | Pierce |
55.9% | 700 | 53 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 36 | ▼ 1 | Draco |
56.0% | 607 | 51 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 37 | ▼ 3 | Bibi |
52.1% | 6078 | 86 | 3.3% | Solid | ||
| 38 | – | Amber |
54.3% | 786 | 55 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 39 | – | Jacky |
52.4% | 2506 | 72 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 40 | ▼ 3 | Mortis |
52.5% | 2101 | 70 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 41 | ▼ 1 | Surge |
51.1% | 6465 | 86 | 2.9% | Solid | ||
| 42 | ▲ 1 | Alli |
54.4% | 537 | 49 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 43 | ▼ 2 | Barley |
51.0% | 4706 | 82 | 2.1% | Solid | ||
| 44 | ▲ 3 | Glowy |
54.8% | 398 | 45 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 45 | ▼ 1 | Najia |
54.5% | 393 | 45 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 46 | ▼ 1 | Buzz |
50.5% | 1971 | 69 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 47 | ▼ 1 | Jae-Yong |
53.8% | 221 | 36 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 48 | – | Cordelius |
49.1% | 1917 | 68 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 49 | ▲ 5 | Gus |
50.6% | 486 | 48 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 50 | ▼ 1 | Berry |
47.6% | 3642 | 78 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 51 | ▼ 1 | Lou |
47.9% | 2071 | 69 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 52 | ▼ 1 | Nita |
47.5% | 3140 | 76 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | ▼ 1 | Meg |
47.4% | 3231 | 76 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | ▼ 1 | Bull |
47.5% | 2316 | 71 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | ▲ 5 | Mandy |
48.9% | 411 | 45 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | ▼ 1 | Angelo |
50.0% | 190 | 34 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | – | Janet |
49.0% | 239 | 37 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▼ 3 | Lola |
48.1% | 314 | 41 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | – | Edgar |
45.2% | 8079 | 90 | 3.9% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | ▼ 1 | Nani |
47.4% | 399 | 45 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | – | Dynamike |
44.5% | 4670 | 82 | 2.4% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | – | Griff |
44.2% | 3254 | 76 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | – | Tick |
43.2% | 6729 | 87 | 3.4% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | – | El Primo |
43.3% | 2855 | 74 | 1.8% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | – | Squeak |
41.3% | 2070 | 69 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | – | Emz |
40.9% | 4993 | 83 | 2.5% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▲ 1 | Pearl |
41.0% | 964 | 58 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▼ 1 | Rosa |
40.5% | 1177 | 61 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | – | Spike |
40.1% | 2206 | 70 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▲ 1 | Lily |
40.2% | 1229 | 62 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▼ 1 | Carl |
39.9% | 1447 | 64 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▲ 1 | Penny |
39.3% | 2433 | 72 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▲ 4 | Pam |
39.3% | 1033 | 59 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▼ 2 | Rico |
39.1% | 2271 | 71 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▼ 1 | Max |
39.0% | 1067 | 59 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | – | Frank |
38.8% | 2265 | 71 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▲ 4 | Tara |
38.8% | 1239 | 62 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▲ 1 | Sandy |
38.6% | 1197 | 61 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▼ 4 | Melodie |
38.4% | 868 | 56 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▼ 2 | Shelly |
38.1% | 2138 | 70 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▼ 1 | Mr. P |
37.8% | 834 | 56 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▲ 3 | Fang |
37.5% | 1436 | 64 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▼ 1 | 8-Bit |
37.4% | 2518 | 72 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▲ 2 | Leon |
36.9% | 1102 | 60 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▼ 1 | Belle |
36.1% | 487 | 48 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▼ 3 | Brock |
36.8% | 2402 | 72 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▲ 1 | Otis |
36.4% | 944 | 58 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▲ 1 | Gale |
36.2% | 1204 | 61 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▲ 2 | Eve |
35.5% | 557 | 50 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | – | Jessie |
35.9% | 2654 | 73 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▼ 4 | Ollie |
33.6% | 405 | 45 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | – | Grom |
34.3% | 968 | 58 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | – | Colette |
34.3% | 1202 | 61 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | – | Maisie |
33.6% | 682 | 53 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | – | Darryl |
33.6% | 1220 | 61 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | – | Buster |
32.3% | 662 | 52 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▲ 3 | Poco |
32.9% | 2097 | 70 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▼ 1 | Bonnie |
30.0% | 477 | 47 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▼ 1 | Piper |
30.7% | 722 | 54 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▲ 3 | Crow |
31.4% | 1956 | 69 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▲ 3 | Bea |
30.5% | 839 | 56 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▼ 1 | Clancy |
30.1% | 797 | 55 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | ▼ 1 | Colt |
30.7% | 1854 | 68 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | ▼ 5 | Charlie |
28.9% | 598 | 51 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Byron |
27.8% | 1003 | 59 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Gene |
22.7% | 576 | 50 | 0.3% | Rather not |