
Hot Zone
33,347 battles collected on this map.
TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 48 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
Short rounds Median 77 s out of 77–105 s in this mode. Early pressure pays off — anyone looking to outplay is playing against the map.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 8,549 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 904 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 8,549 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 904 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (470 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Wendy |
70.0% | 2959 | 75 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Trunk |
68.9% | 3259 | 76 | 1.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Nori |
66.3% | 9440 | 92 | 4.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | R-T |
67.4% | 2401 | 72 | 1.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | ▲ 1 | Juju |
64.3% | 4211 | 80 | 2.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | ▼ 1 | Doug |
63.8% | 5689 | 85 | 2.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | ▲ 2 | Hank |
63.4% | 3075 | 75 | 1.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | – | Sirius |
63.5% | 2611 | 73 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | ▼ 2 | Starr Nova |
63.8% | 2258 | 71 | 0.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | – | Shade |
61.3% | 6715 | 87 | 3.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | ▲ 2 | Gigi |
62.8% | 927 | 57 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 12 | ▼ 1 | Willow |
61.4% | 1436 | 64 | 0.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 13 | ▼ 1 | Damian |
61.7% | 1095 | 60 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 14 | – | Ziggy |
62.0% | 895 | 57 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | ▲ 1 | Meeple |
60.3% | 1541 | 65 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 16 | ▼ 1 | Mina |
61.0% | 953 | 58 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | – | Bolt |
61.0% | 875 | 57 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | – | Lumi |
59.2% | 1054 | 59 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | ▲ 1 | Kaze |
58.2% | 1528 | 65 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | ▼ 1 | Mico |
56.9% | 2871 | 74 | 1.3% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | ▲ 1 | Chuck |
57.7% | 1280 | 62 | 0.9% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | ▼ 1 | Stu |
56.7% | 1434 | 64 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | – | Finx |
59.8% | 448 | 47 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | ▲ 2 | Gray |
58.5% | 624 | 51 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | ▼ 2 | Kit |
56.3% | 1376 | 63 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 26 | ▲ 2 | Sam |
58.7% | 543 | 49 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 27 | ▼ 1 | Ash |
55.6% | 1682 | 66 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 28 | ▲ 1 | Bo |
54.9% | 1778 | 67 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 29 | ▼ 2 | Chester |
56.1% | 880 | 57 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 30 | ▲ 1 | Sprout |
56.4% | 746 | 54 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 31 | ▲ 6 | Moe |
58.5% | 410 | 45 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 32 | ▼ 2 | Kenji |
53.3% | 5344 | 84 | 2.3% | Solid | ||
| 33 | ▼ 1 | Ruffs |
57.1% | 510 | 48 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 34 | ▼ 1 | Larry & Lawrie |
53.6% | 2593 | 73 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 35 | ▲ 4 | Draco |
55.8% | 582 | 50 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 36 | ▼ 2 | Bibi |
51.9% | 5847 | 85 | 3.4% | Solid | ||
| 37 | ▲ 6 | Pierce |
54.9% | 652 | 52 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 38 | ▼ 2 | Jacky |
52.4% | 2407 | 72 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 39 | ▼ 4 | Mortis |
52.5% | 2029 | 69 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 40 | – | Surge |
51.1% | 6223 | 86 | 2.9% | Solid | ||
| 41 | ▲ 1 | Alli |
54.7% | 523 | 49 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 42 | ▼ 4 | Amber |
53.7% | 728 | 54 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 43 | ▼ 2 | Barley |
50.8% | 4546 | 81 | 2.1% | Solid | ||
| 44 | – | Najia |
55.0% | 367 | 44 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 45 | ▲ 2 | Glowy |
54.4% | 384 | 44 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 46 | ▼ 1 | Buzz |
50.8% | 1910 | 68 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 47 | ▲ 1 | Cordelius |
49.3% | 1846 | 68 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 48 | ▲ 6 | Gus |
51.5% | 437 | 46 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 49 | ▼ 3 | Jae-Yong |
53.1% | 209 | 35 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 50 | – | Nita |
47.8% | 3017 | 75 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 51 | ▼ 2 | Berry |
47.6% | 3501 | 77 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 52 | – | Lou |
48.0% | 2011 | 69 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | ▼ 2 | Meg |
47.5% | 3142 | 76 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | ▼ 1 | Bull |
47.8% | 2228 | 71 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | ▲ 4 | Janet |
48.9% | 227 | 36 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | ▲ 4 | Mandy |
47.9% | 382 | 44 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | ▼ 4 | Angelo |
49.2% | 177 | 33 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▼ 2 | Lola |
48.1% | 308 | 41 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | ▲ 1 | Edgar |
45.1% | 7772 | 89 | 3.9% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | ▼ 3 | Nani |
47.0% | 379 | 44 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | – | Dynamike |
44.2% | 4469 | 81 | 2.4% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | – | Griff |
44.3% | 3129 | 76 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | – | Tick |
43.4% | 6490 | 87 | 3.5% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | – | El Primo |
42.6% | 2655 | 73 | 1.7% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | – | Squeak |
41.7% | 1974 | 69 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | – | Emz |
40.8% | 4787 | 82 | 2.5% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | – | Rosa |
40.9% | 1129 | 60 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▲ 1 | Pearl |
40.8% | 919 | 57 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▲ 2 | Lily |
40.6% | 1169 | 61 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▼ 2 | Carl |
40.5% | 1392 | 63 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▼ 1 | Spike |
39.6% | 2082 | 69 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | – | Penny |
39.2% | 2320 | 71 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | – | Rico |
39.1% | 2154 | 70 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▲ 3 | Sandy |
38.9% | 1123 | 60 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | – | Melodie |
38.8% | 823 | 56 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | – | Frank |
38.7% | 2137 | 70 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▲ 2 | Pam |
38.5% | 978 | 58 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▼ 4 | Max |
38.4% | 1004 | 59 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▲ 3 | Tara |
38.3% | 1202 | 61 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▼ 2 | Shelly |
37.9% | 2053 | 69 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▼ 2 | Mr. P |
37.6% | 785 | 55 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▲ 4 | Fang |
37.7% | 1389 | 63 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▲ 1 | 8-Bit |
37.4% | 2393 | 72 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▼ 1 | Belle |
36.6% | 470 | 47 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▲ 1 | Leon |
37.0% | 1052 | 59 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▼ 5 | Brock |
37.0% | 2312 | 71 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▲ 4 | Eve |
35.6% | 525 | 49 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | – | Otis |
35.9% | 894 | 57 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | – | Gale |
35.8% | 1155 | 61 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▼ 3 | Ollie |
34.1% | 390 | 44 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▼ 1 | Jessie |
35.4% | 2523 | 72 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▲ 1 | Colette |
34.0% | 1153 | 61 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▲ 2 | Buster |
32.8% | 628 | 52 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▲ 2 | Darryl |
33.5% | 1157 | 61 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▼ 3 | Grom |
33.3% | 911 | 57 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▼ 2 | Maisie |
32.8% | 650 | 52 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▲ 1 | Poco |
32.5% | 1981 | 69 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▼ 1 | Bonnie |
30.1% | 458 | 47 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | – | Piper |
30.6% | 699 | 53 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▲ 2 | Crow |
31.4% | 1881 | 68 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▲ 3 | Bea |
30.6% | 805 | 55 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▼ 3 | Clancy |
29.7% | 761 | 54 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | ▼ 1 | Colt |
30.7% | 1788 | 67 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | ▼ 1 | Charlie |
28.0% | 558 | 50 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Byron |
28.6% | 948 | 58 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Gene |
23.2% | 552 | 50 | 0.3% | Rather not |