
Hot Zone
27,378 battles collected on this map.
TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 47 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
Short rounds Median 77 s out of 77–105 s in this mode. Early pressure pays off — anyone looking to outplay is playing against the map.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 7,926 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 862 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 7,926 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 862 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (392 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Wendy |
71.1% | 2543 | 72 | 1.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Trunk |
70.0% | 2642 | 73 | 1.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Nori |
66.5% | 7776 | 89 | 4.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | R-T |
67.7% | 2023 | 69 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | – | Doug |
64.2% | 4753 | 82 | 2.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | – | Juju |
64.1% | 3521 | 77 | 2.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | ▲ 1 | Starr Nova |
64.1% | 1930 | 68 | 0.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | ▼ 1 | Sirius |
63.7% | 2172 | 70 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | – | Hank |
63.2% | 2588 | 73 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | – | Shade |
61.2% | 5462 | 84 | 3.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | – | Ziggy |
63.1% | 732 | 54 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 12 | – | Damian |
62.2% | 909 | 57 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 13 | ▲ 1 | Mina |
62.1% | 812 | 55 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 14 | ▲ 1 | Meeple |
60.5% | 1338 | 63 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | ▲ 1 | Gigi |
62.4% | 728 | 54 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 16 | ▼ 3 | Willow |
61.0% | 1104 | 60 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | – | Bolt |
61.2% | 725 | 54 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | ▲ 1 | Lumi |
59.7% | 890 | 57 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | ▼ 1 | Mico |
57.3% | 2412 | 72 | 1.4% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | – | Kaze |
57.7% | 1228 | 62 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | – | Stu |
57.4% | 1220 | 61 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | ▲ 2 | Chuck |
57.4% | 935 | 58 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | ▲ 2 | Kit |
57.0% | 1116 | 60 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | ▼ 1 | Finx |
60.1% | 383 | 44 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | ▼ 3 | Ash |
55.7% | 1361 | 63 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 26 | – | Gray |
58.1% | 527 | 49 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 27 | – | Chester |
56.8% | 724 | 54 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 28 | ▲ 7 | Sam |
57.9% | 430 | 46 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 29 | ▲ 2 | Bo |
54.6% | 1473 | 64 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 30 | ▼ 1 | Kenji |
53.2% | 4480 | 81 | 2.1% | Solid | ||
| 31 | – | Ruffs |
57.6% | 443 | 46 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 32 | – | Sprout |
56.0% | 634 | 52 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 33 | ▲ 2 | Larry & Lawrie |
53.4% | 2168 | 70 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 34 | ▼ 1 | Bibi |
52.1% | 4651 | 82 | 3.5% | Solid | ||
| 35 | ▼ 1 | Moe |
57.5% | 327 | 42 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 36 | ▲ 2 | Jacky |
52.7% | 1937 | 68 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 37 | ▲ 2 | Draco |
55.5% | 479 | 48 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 38 | ▼ 2 | Mortis |
52.4% | 1627 | 66 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 39 | ▲ 1 | Surge |
51.0% | 5168 | 83 | 2.9% | Solid | ||
| 40 | ▼ 11 | Najia |
55.8% | 310 | 41 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 41 | ▲ 1 | Alli |
54.6% | 423 | 46 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 42 | ▼ 1 | Barley |
50.3% | 3764 | 78 | 2.0% | Solid | ||
| 43 | – | Amber |
52.8% | 587 | 51 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 44 | – | Pierce |
52.9% | 535 | 49 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 45 | ▲ 1 | Buzz |
49.9% | 1541 | 65 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 46 | ▼ 1 | Jae-Yong |
55.6% | 162 | 31 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 47 | ▲ 2 | Meg |
48.2% | 2822 | 74 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 48 | – | Lou |
48.5% | 1755 | 67 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 49 | ▼ 2 | Berry |
48.0% | 2941 | 75 | 1.9% | Solid | ||
| 50 | – | Glowy |
51.2% | 291 | 40 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 51 | – | Angelo |
53.1% | 145 | 30 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 52 | ▲ 1 | Cordelius |
48.0% | 1420 | 64 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | ▼ 1 | Nita |
47.3% | 2452 | 72 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | – | Bull |
47.4% | 1802 | 67 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | – | Janet |
49.7% | 185 | 33 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | ▲ 3 | Gus |
48.0% | 350 | 43 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | ▲ 1 | Lola |
48.4% | 250 | 38 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▼ 2 | Nani |
47.3% | 313 | 41 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | ▲ 1 | Edgar |
44.5% | 6412 | 86 | 4.3% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | ▼ 3 | Mandy |
46.2% | 318 | 41 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | ▲ 1 | Dynamike |
44.1% | 3606 | 78 | 2.4% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▲ 1 | Griff |
44.1% | 2645 | 73 | 2.0% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▼ 2 | Tick |
43.3% | 5206 | 83 | 3.4% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▲ 1 | Squeak |
41.6% | 1585 | 65 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▼ 1 | El Primo |
41.4% | 2032 | 69 | 1.7% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▲ 1 | Emz |
40.6% | 3894 | 79 | 2.7% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▼ 1 | Pearl |
40.7% | 752 | 54 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▲ 1 | Carl |
40.4% | 1125 | 60 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▼ 1 | Rosa |
40.2% | 908 | 57 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | – | Spike |
39.5% | 1631 | 66 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▲ 2 | Rico |
39.3% | 1752 | 67 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▼ 1 | Penny |
39.2% | 1891 | 68 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▼ 1 | Lily |
39.1% | 910 | 57 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▲ 5 | Max |
38.8% | 794 | 55 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | – | Shelly |
38.6% | 1661 | 66 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▼ 2 | Pam |
38.5% | 816 | 55 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | – | Melodie |
38.3% | 664 | 52 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | – | Frank |
38.1% | 1775 | 67 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▼ 3 | 8-Bit |
37.9% | 1942 | 68 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▲ 4 | Sandy |
37.0% | 883 | 57 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | – | Brock |
37.1% | 1912 | 68 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▼ 2 | Mr. P |
36.7% | 648 | 52 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▼ 1 | Ollie |
35.2% | 310 | 41 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▲ 2 | Fang |
36.9% | 1175 | 61 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▲ 1 | Belle |
35.5% | 394 | 45 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▲ 5 | Tara |
36.6% | 983 | 58 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▼ 5 | Leon |
36.3% | 877 | 57 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▼ 2 | Gale |
35.9% | 979 | 58 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | – | Otis |
35.5% | 736 | 54 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▼ 2 | Eve |
33.8% | 429 | 46 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | – | Jessie |
34.7% | 2067 | 69 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | – | Maisie |
32.9% | 532 | 49 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▲ 4 | Colette |
33.6% | 966 | 58 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▼ 1 | Bonnie |
31.6% | 367 | 44 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▲ 1 | Grom |
33.1% | 753 | 54 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▼ 1 | Darryl |
33.2% | 932 | 57 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▼ 3 | Buster |
31.1% | 479 | 48 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▲ 1 | Clancy |
30.8% | 613 | 51 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▲ 1 | Colt |
31.9% | 1515 | 65 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▲ 1 | Poco |
31.9% | 1611 | 66 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▲ 1 | Charlie |
29.4% | 432 | 46 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▼ 4 | Piper |
30.1% | 554 | 50 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | – | Bea |
29.7% | 636 | 52 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | – | Crow |
31.0% | 1534 | 65 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Byron |
28.2% | 753 | 54 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Gene |
22.8% | 460 | 47 | 0.3% | Rather not |