
Hot Zone
25,377 battles collected on this map.
TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 48 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
Short rounds Median 77 s out of 77–105 s in this mode. Early pressure pays off — anyone looking to outplay is playing against the map.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 7,744 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 838 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 7,744 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 838 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (380 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Wendy |
71.7% | 2377 | 71 | 1.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Trunk |
70.2% | 2431 | 72 | 1.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Nori |
66.7% | 7245 | 88 | 1.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | R-T |
67.3% | 1874 | 68 | 0.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | – | Doug |
64.3% | 4434 | 81 | 1.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | – | Juju |
63.6% | 3231 | 76 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | – | Sirius |
64.0% | 2018 | 69 | 0.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | – | Starr Nova |
64.2% | 1844 | 68 | 0.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | – | Hank |
63.2% | 2446 | 72 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | – | Shade |
61.4% | 5071 | 83 | 2.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | – | Ziggy |
63.1% | 697 | 53 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 12 | – | Damian |
62.2% | 828 | 56 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 13 | – | Willow |
61.5% | 1013 | 59 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 14 | – | Mina |
62.4% | 750 | 54 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | – | Meeple |
60.7% | 1246 | 62 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 16 | – | Gigi |
62.5% | 667 | 52 | 0.0% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | – | Bolt |
61.1% | 674 | 53 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | – | Mico |
57.8% | 2230 | 71 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | – | Lumi |
59.9% | 840 | 56 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | – | Kaze |
57.9% | 1133 | 60 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | – | Stu |
56.9% | 1152 | 61 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | – | Ash |
56.6% | 1282 | 62 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | – | Finx |
60.8% | 367 | 44 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | – | Chuck |
57.1% | 861 | 56 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | – | Kit |
56.4% | 1028 | 59 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 26 | – | Gray |
58.4% | 490 | 48 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 27 | – | Chester |
57.0% | 677 | 53 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 28 | – | Kenji |
53.5% | 4223 | 80 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 29 | – | Najia |
59.5% | 279 | 39 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 30 | – | Bo |
54.1% | 1368 | 63 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 31 | – | Ruffs |
57.0% | 412 | 45 | 16.5% | Solid | ||
| 32 | – | Sprout |
55.5% | 593 | 51 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 33 | – | Moe |
57.5% | 315 | 41 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 34 | – | Bibi |
52.0% | 4229 | 80 | 2.6% | Solid | ||
| 35 | – | Larry & Lawrie |
52.6% | 2013 | 69 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 36 | – | Mortis |
52.9% | 1481 | 64 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 37 | – | Sam |
56.4% | 362 | 43 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 38 | – | Draco |
55.2% | 433 | 46 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 39 | – | Jacky |
52.1% | 1793 | 67 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 40 | – | Surge |
51.0% | 4815 | 82 | 2.1% | Solid | ||
| 41 | – | Barley |
50.8% | 3530 | 77 | 2.0% | Solid | ||
| 42 | – | Alli |
54.0% | 387 | 44 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 43 | – | Amber |
52.7% | 531 | 49 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 44 | – | Pierce |
52.6% | 500 | 48 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 45 | – | Jae-Yong |
57.2% | 152 | 30 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 46 | – | Buzz |
49.0% | 1438 | 64 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 47 | – | Berry |
48.4% | 2718 | 73 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 48 | – | Lou |
48.7% | 1673 | 66 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 49 | – | Meg |
48.0% | 2717 | 73 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 50 | – | Glowy |
51.3% | 261 | 38 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 51 | – | Angelo |
53.5% | 142 | 29 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 52 | – | Nita |
47.3% | 2274 | 71 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | – | Cordelius |
47.7% | 1286 | 62 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | – | Bull |
47.3% | 1634 | 66 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | – | Janet |
50.3% | 169 | 32 | 6.8% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | – | Nani |
48.1% | 291 | 40 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | – | Mandy |
47.9% | 286 | 40 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | – | Lola |
47.8% | 224 | 36 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | – | Gus |
47.2% | 322 | 42 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | – | Edgar |
44.2% | 5911 | 85 | 3.9% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | – | Tick |
43.5% | 4786 | 82 | 1.9% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | – | Dynamike |
43.7% | 3309 | 76 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | – | Griff |
43.7% | 2409 | 72 | 1.7% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | – | El Primo |
41.2% | 1839 | 68 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | – | Squeak |
41.3% | 1446 | 64 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | – | Pearl |
41.1% | 696 | 53 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | – | Emz |
40.4% | 3585 | 78 | 2.6% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | – | Rosa |
40.5% | 837 | 56 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | – | Carl |
40.5% | 1038 | 59 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | – | Spike |
39.7% | 1510 | 65 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | – | Penny |
39.4% | 1765 | 67 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | – | Lily |
39.2% | 846 | 56 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | – | Rico |
39.2% | 1638 | 66 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | – | Pam |
38.6% | 762 | 54 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | – | Shelly |
38.4% | 1541 | 65 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | – | 8-Bit |
38.2% | 1805 | 67 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | – | Melodie |
37.5% | 616 | 51 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | – | Frank |
37.6% | 1637 | 66 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | – | Max |
37.3% | 715 | 54 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | – | Mr. P |
36.9% | 601 | 51 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | – | Brock |
37.1% | 1772 | 67 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | – | Leon |
36.2% | 814 | 55 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▲ 1 | Sandy |
36.2% | 815 | 55 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▲ 1 | Fang |
36.3% | 1096 | 60 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▼ 3 | Ollie |
34.1% | 290 | 40 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▲ 1 | Gale |
36.1% | 925 | 57 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | – | Belle |
34.6% | 361 | 43 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▲ 1 | Otis |
35.7% | 698 | 53 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▼ 1 | Eve |
34.6% | 396 | 45 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | – | Tara |
35.4% | 899 | 57 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | – | Jessie |
35.4% | 1915 | 68 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | – | Maisie |
34.0% | 483 | 48 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | – | Bonnie |
31.1% | 341 | 42 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | – | Buster |
31.6% | 446 | 46 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | – | Darryl |
32.9% | 858 | 56 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | – | Grom |
32.4% | 703 | 53 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | – | Colette |
32.7% | 885 | 57 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | – | Piper |
31.1% | 521 | 49 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | – | Clancy |
31.3% | 569 | 50 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | – | Colt |
31.6% | 1426 | 64 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | – | Charlie |
28.6% | 399 | 45 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | – | Poco |
31.3% | 1494 | 65 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | – | Crow |
31.2% | 1422 | 64 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | – | Bea |
29.3% | 566 | 50 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Byron |
28.9% | 689 | 53 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Gene |
21.4% | 430 | 46 | 0.5% | Rather not |