Hot Zone

Parallel Plays

6,950 battles collected on this map.

MEDIUM — an average amount of choice: 38 of 88 brawlers above 50%.

Recommendation

Short rounds Median 82 s out of 82–113 s in this mode. Early pressure pays off — anyone looking to outplay is playing against the map.

Damage Dealer 407 games

Damage Dealer 253 games

Damage Dealer 223 games

Damage Dealer 1439 games

Damage Dealer 82 games

Damage Dealer 210 games

Damage Dealer 650 games

Trust

Solid

48.3%Win rate

What the rating, star, trust and the tags mean

Strong pickHow the brawler stands on this map compared to the whole mode (Hot Zone): Strong pick is the top tenth of all map/brawler rows, Good pick the top quarter, Solid the upper half, Rather not the rest. What is measured is the cautiously computed win rate (Wilson lower bound), the same number the cards are sorted by — not the percentage shown beside it. The thresholds come from the field rather than from fixed percentages: the modes sit at different levels, and in Showdown the number counts trophy gains rather than wins. Not to be confused with the tier list — that ranks a brawler by how many maps of the rotation he is usable on, across all maps together. A Rather not among the recommended eight therefore does not mean “played badly”, but: this map has nothing better to offer.

TrustHow dependable the win rate next to it is, 0–100. Depends purely on the number of games — not on how good the brawler is.

Carry — becomes star player unusually often on this map: he deals the damage and takes the objective. The game runs through him.

Enabler — rarely becomes star player: he clears the way, heals, controls, and others do the scoring. This is no verdict on his strength — how good he is here is the win rate on the card. Measured across 1,620 map/brawler rows, enablers win on average 3.8 points less often than carries, but the star rate explains only 11% of the differences: there are plenty of strong enablers and weak carries. The star says how a brawler wins, not whether.

Hidden gems & traps

From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.

Underrated

Damian 67.5%Winrate 228 games

Bolt 65.7%Winrate 210 games

Ziggy 65.5%Winrate 194 games

Mina 62.8%Winrate 239 games

Overrated

Edgar 44.7%Winrate 1,736 games

Tick 41.6%Winrate 1,293 games

Dynamike 44.1%Winrate 966 games

Emz 38.7%Winrate 906 games

All brawlers on this map

Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.

#		Brawler	Win rate	Games	Trust	Pick rate	Rating
1	–	Nori	68.4%	1896	68	4.5%	Strong pick
2	–	Trunk	71.5%	631	52	1.5%	Strong pick
3	–	Wendy	70.8%	360	43	0.9%	Strong pick
4	–	Juju	63.7%	995	58	2.4%	Strong pick
5	–	R-T	66.8%	407	45	1.0%	Strong pick
6	–	Doug	61.7%	1139	60	2.7%	Strong pick
7	–	Shade	60.3%	1295	62	3.1%	Strong pick
8	▲ 1	Hank	62.3%	600	51	1.4%	Strong pick
9	▲ 1	Starr Nova	62.4%	511	48	1.2%	Good pick
10	▼ 2	Meeple	64.2%	366	43	0.9%	Good pick
11	▲ 1	Sirius	62.2%	508	48	1.2%	Good pick
12	▼ 1	Damian	67.5%	228	36	0.5%	Good pick
13	–	Bolt	65.7%	210	35	0.5%	Good pick
14	–	Mico	57.8%	830	56	2.0%	Good pick
15	–	Ziggy	65.5%	194	34	0.5%	Good pick
16	–	Kaze	59.9%	382	44	0.9%	Good pick
17	–	Mina	62.8%	239	37	0.6%	Good pick
18	–	Stu	61.1%	270	39	0.6%	Good pick
19	▲ 1	Gigi	60.2%	246	38	0.6%	Good pick
20	▼ 1	Kenji	53.9%	1249	62	3.0%	Solid
21	–	Lumi	59.3%	253	38	0.6%	Solid
22	▲ 1	Finx	63.7%	124	27	0.3%	Solid
23	▲ 1	Chester	58.7%	223	36	0.5%	Solid
24	▼ 2	Jacky	54.6%	538	49	1.3%	Solid
25	–	Willow	56.2%	313	41	0.8%	Solid
26	–	Ash	56.5%	285	40	0.7%	Solid
27	▲ 3	Bibi	51.6%	1256	62	3.0%	Solid
28	–	Kit	55.5%	272	39	0.7%	Solid
29	▼ 2	Najia	66.7%	72	19	0.2%	Solid
30	▼ 1	Alli	57.7%	149	30	0.4%	Solid
31	▲ 1	Surge	50.5%	1439	64	3.5%	Solid
32	▼ 1	Meg	50.3%	1579	65	3.8%	Solid
33	–	Barley	50.8%	982	58	2.4%	Solid
34	–	Moe	61.0%	82	21	0.2%	Solid
35	–	Sam	58.3%	96	23	0.2%	Solid
36	–	Mortis	50.8%	423	46	1.0%	Solid
37	–	Chuck	52.9%	210	35	0.5%	Solid
38	–	Ruffs	54.0%	113	26	0.3%	Solid
39	–	Bo	49.6%	351	43	0.8%	Solid
40	▲ 1	Nita	48.3%	650	52	1.6%	Solid
41	▼ 1	Berry	48.0%	754	54	1.8%	Solid
42	▲ 4	Sprout	50.6%	172	32	0.4%	Rather not
43	–	Larry & Lawrie	48.0%	533	49	1.3%	Rather not
44	▼ 2	Bull	48.0%	398	45	1.0%	Rather not
45	▲ 3	Lou	47.8%	404	45	1.0%	Rather not
46	▲ 3	Draco	50.0%	132	28	0.3%	Rather not
47	▼ 2	Buzz	47.5%	453	47	1.1%	Rather not
48	▼ 4	Gray	50.0%	116	26	0.3%	Rather not
49	▼ 2	Nani	51.2%	82	21	0.2%	Rather not
50	▲ 1	Jae-Yong	51.4%	37	9	0.1%	Rather not
51	▲ 2	Lola	49.2%	61	17	0.1%	Rather not
52	▲ 2	Angelo	51.6%	31	7	0.1%	Rather not
53	▲ 2	Cordelius	46.2%	342	42	0.8%	Rather not
54	▲ 5	Pierce	47.8%	92	23	0.2%	Rather not
55	▼ 3	Edgar	44.7%	1736	67	4.2%	Rather not
56	▼ 6	Griff	45.1%	750	54	1.8%	Rather not
57	–	Mandy	47.2%	89	22	0.2%	Rather not
58	▼ 2	Amber	45.4%	163	31	0.4%	Rather not
59	▼ 1	Dynamike	44.1%	966	58	2.3%	Rather not
60	–	Glowy	44.6%	56	15	0.1%	Rather not
61	▲ 2	El Primo	43.3%	439	46	1.1%	Rather not
62	▼ 1	Gus	42.0%	81	21	0.2%	Rather not
63	▼ 1	Ollie	41.3%	63	17	0.2%	Rather not
64	–	Clancy	42.0%	143	29	0.3%	Rather not
65	–	Rosa	41.8%	201	35	0.5%	Rather not
66	▲ 5	Maisie	40.8%	125	27	0.3%	Rather not
67	–	Mr. P	40.8%	125	27	0.3%	Rather not
68	▲ 4	Squeak	41.9%	363	43	0.9%	Rather not
69	▼ 1	Tick	41.6%	1293	62	3.1%	Rather not
70	▼ 4	Brock	41.6%	471	47	1.1%	Rather not
71	▼ 1	Belle	38.8%	85	22	0.2%	Rather not
72	▼ 3	Carl	40.9%	269	39	0.6%	Rather not
73	▲ 4	Rico	41.1%	375	44	0.9%	Rather not
74	–	Frank	40.6%	367	44	0.9%	Rather not
75	▲ 1	Pam	39.4%	170	32	0.4%	Rather not
76	▼ 1	Colette	40.0%	245	37	0.6%	Rather not
77	▼ 4	Leon	39.7%	234	37	0.6%	Rather not
78	▲ 2	Buster	37.4%	115	26	0.3%	Rather not
79	–	Pearl	37.6%	141	29	0.3%	Rather not
80	▲ 2	Byron	38.1%	168	32	0.4%	Rather not
81	▼ 3	Max	38.3%	196	34	0.5%	Rather not
82	▼ 1	Melodie	37.1%	151	30	0.4%	Rather not
83	–	Janet	26.5%	49	13	0.1%	Rather not
84	▲ 1	Bonnie	26.9%	52	14	0.1%	Rather not
85	▲ 1	Emz	38.7%	906	57	2.2%	Rather not
86	▼ 2	Sandy	36.7%	215	36	0.5%	Rather not
87	▲ 1	Spike	37.2%	384	44	0.9%	Rather not
88	▲ 3	Gale	36.1%	241	37	0.6%	Rather not
89	▼ 2	Grom	34.9%	175	32	0.4%	Rather not
90	▼ 1	Otis	34.7%	170	32	0.4%	Rather not
91	▲ 1	Lily	35.0%	200	34	0.5%	Rather not
92	▲ 2	8-Bit	36.4%	404	45	1.0%	Rather not
93	–	Tara	35.2%	261	38	0.6%	Rather not
94	▲ 2	Jessie	36.7%	526	49	1.3%	Rather not
95	▲ 3	Penny	36.2%	431	46	1.0%	Rather not
96	▼ 1	Piper	31.9%	144	30	0.3%	Rather not
97	–	Bea	29.8%	114	26	0.3%	Rather not
98	▼ 8	Charlie	27.1%	96	23	0.2%	Rather not
99	–	Eve	23.8%	84	21	0.2%	Rather not
100	▲ 3	Shelly	33.9%	383	44	0.9%	Rather not
101	▼ 1	Crow	33.8%	414	45	1.0%	Rather not
102	▼ 1	Fang	31.8%	296	40	0.7%	Rather not
103	▼ 1	Colt	32.4%	352	43	0.8%	Rather not
104	–	Gene	19.8%	86	22	0.2%	Rather not
105	–	Darryl	27.3%	187	33	0.4%	Rather not
106	–	Poco	25.1%	387	44	0.9%	Rather not