Brawl Ball

Pinhole Punt

632,713 battles collected on this map.

OPEN — more choice than on most maps: 70 of 106 brawlers above 50%.

Recommendation

Damage Dealer 23393 games

Damage Dealer 16809 games

Controller 21123 games

Damage Dealer 6418 games

Artillery 63116 games

Damage Dealer 22517 games

Damage Dealer 15213 games

Controller 163371 games

Damage Dealer 38155 games

Controller 14112 games

Controller 28750 games

Controller 31549 games

Damage Dealer 25116 games

What the rating, star, trust and the tags mean

Strong pickHow the brawler stands on this map compared to the whole mode (Brawl Ball): Strong pick is the top tenth of all map/brawler rows, Good pick the top quarter, Solid the upper half, Rather not the rest. What is measured is the cautiously computed win rate (Wilson lower bound), the same number the cards are sorted by — not the percentage shown beside it. The thresholds come from the field rather than from fixed percentages: the modes sit at different levels, and in Showdown the number counts trophy gains rather than wins. Not to be confused with the tier list — that ranks a brawler by how many maps of the rotation he is usable on, across all maps together. A Rather not among the recommended eight therefore does not mean “played badly”, but: this map has nothing better to offer.

TrustHow dependable the win rate next to it is, 0–100. Depends purely on the number of games — not on how good the brawler is.

Carry — becomes star player unusually often on this map: he deals the damage and takes the objective. The game runs through him.

Enabler — rarely becomes star player: he clears the way, heals, controls, and others do the scoring. This is no verdict on his strength — how good he is here is the win rate on the card. Measured across 1,620 map/brawler rows, enablers win on average 3.8 points less often than carries, but the star rate explains only 11% of the differences: there are plenty of strong enablers and weak carries. The star says how a brawler wins, not whether.

Hidden gems & traps

From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.

Underrated

Ash 61.7%Winrate 16,479 games

Hank 59.5%Winrate 14,032 games

Moe 59.4%Winrate 16,809 games

Gigi 59.5%Winrate 11,889 games

Overrated

Edgar 37.8%Winrate 216,157 games

Surge 39.9%Winrate 129,093 games

Rico 40.9%Winrate 117,045 games

Colt 40.6%Winrate 107,324 games

If you queue as three

The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.

Searched freely across 9,154 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 1,245 real line-ups.

68.9% expected

68.5% expected

68.4% expected

68.4% expected

67.3% expected

67.2% expected

How these numbers are arrived at

What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.

Best · on this map. All 9,154 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 1,245 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.

What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (5 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.

All brawlers on this map

Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.

#		Brawler	Win rate	Games	Trust	Pick rate	Rating
1	–	Bolt	65.3%	28983	100	0.8%	Strong pick
2	–	Starr Nova	61.7%	59226	100	1.6%	Strong pick
3	–	Damian	61.8%	30466	100	0.8%	Strong pick
4	–	Nori	61.3%	112058	100	3.0%	Strong pick
5	–	Ash	61.7%	16479	100	0.4%	Strong pick
6	–	Wendy	59.9%	186605	100	4.9%	Strong pick
7	–	Lumi	59.7%	23393	100	0.6%	Strong pick
8	▲ 2	Hank	59.5%	14032	98	0.4%	Strong pick
9	–	Moe	59.4%	16809	100	0.4%	Strong pick
10	▼ 2	Gigi	59.5%	11889	96	0.3%	Strong pick
11	–	Lou	58.5%	21123	100	0.6%	Good pick
12	–	R-T	58.6%	6418	86	0.2%	Good pick
13	–	Doug	57.6%	19362	100	0.5%	Good pick
14	▲ 2	Ollie	58.3%	5742	85	0.2%	Good pick
15	▼ 1	Sirius	57.4%	27053	100	0.7%	Good pick
16	▼ 1	Melodie	57.3%	26742	100	0.7%	Good pick
17	▲ 3	Tick	57.0%	63116	100	1.7%	Good pick
18	▼ 1	Clancy	57.3%	22517	100	0.6%	Good pick
19	–	Buster	57.7%	7883	89	0.2%	Good pick
20	▼ 2	Trunk	57.5%	9956	93	0.3%	Good pick
21	–	Pierce	56.7%	34547	100	0.9%	Good pick
22	–	Pearl	56.7%	15213	99	0.4%	Good pick
23	–	Mina	56.3%	32922	100	0.9%	Good pick
24	–	Sam	56.6%	9791	93	0.3%	Good pick
25	–	Glowy	56.7%	8088	90	0.2%	Good pick
26	–	Draco	56.6%	9089	92	0.2%	Good pick
27	–	Ziggy	56.6%	6702	87	0.2%	Good pick
28	▲ 1	Kenji	55.3%	87747	100	2.3%	Good pick
29	▼ 1	Finx	56.1%	7352	88	0.2%	Good pick
30	–	Griff	54.9%	163371	100	4.3%	Solid
31	–	Chester	55.0%	38155	100	1.0%	Solid
32	–	Kaze	55.3%	16594	100	0.4%	Solid
33	–	Jae-Yong	56.0%	5192	83	0.1%	Solid
34	–	Ruffs	55.5%	10461	94	0.3%	Solid
35	–	Sandy	55.1%	14112	98	0.4%	Solid
36	▲ 1	Gale	54.5%	28750	100	0.8%	Solid
37	▼ 1	Jacky	54.6%	15546	100	0.4%	Solid
38	–	Bo	54.4%	31549	100	0.8%	Solid
39	–	Alli	54.9%	7935	90	0.2%	Solid
40	▲ 3	Tara	54.2%	25116	100	0.7%	Solid
41	▼ 1	Amber	54.5%	12918	97	0.3%	Solid
42	▼ 1	Charlie	54.7%	8272	90	0.2%	Solid
43	▼ 1	Otis	54.1%	24729	100	0.7%	Solid
44	–	Meeple	54.2%	14646	99	0.4%	Solid
45	–	Squeak	53.8%	26089	100	0.7%	Solid
46	–	Maisie	53.7%	15008	99	0.4%	Solid
47	▲ 1	Willow	53.8%	9251	92	0.2%	Solid
48	▼ 1	Shade	53.5%	15918	100	0.4%	Solid
49	–	Cordelius	53.2%	18865	100	0.5%	Solid
50	▲ 1	Berry	53.0%	14906	99	0.4%	Solid
51	▲ 1	Max	52.6%	49862	100	1.3%	Solid
52	▼ 2	Carl	52.7%	32170	100	0.8%	Solid
53	–	Gray	52.7%	16119	100	0.4%	Solid
54	–	Stu	52.3%	41508	100	1.1%	Solid
55	–	Juju	53.6%	2855	74	0.1%	Solid
56	▲ 1	Bibi	51.8%	175939	100	4.6%	Solid
57	▲ 1	Najia	52.5%	6129	86	0.2%	Solid
58	▼ 2	Pam	52.4%	7459	89	0.2%	Solid
59	–	Buzz	51.6%	27387	100	0.7%	Solid
60	▲ 2	Janet	51.9%	4989	83	0.1%	Solid
61	▼ 1	Meg	50.8%	50644	100	1.3%	Solid
62	▼ 1	Lily	51.2%	12599	96	0.3%	Solid
63	▲ 1	Sprout	51.1%	10190	93	0.3%	Solid
64	▲ 1	Eve	51.5%	4945	82	0.1%	Solid
65	▼ 2	Larry & Lawrie	51.3%	6879	87	0.2%	Solid
66	–	Emz	50.2%	115104	100	3.0%	Solid
67	–	Kit	50.5%	22508	100	0.6%	Solid
68	–	Rosa	50.5%	18233	100	0.5%	Rather not
69	–	Mico	51.0%	5242	83	0.1%	Rather not
70	–	Lola	50.6%	5855	85	0.2%	Rather not
71	–	Bea	49.8%	16164	100	0.4%	Rather not
72	–	Fang	49.4%	55608	100	1.5%	Rather not
73	–	Bull	49.3%	77987	100	2.1%	Rather not
74	–	Poco	49.3%	40094	100	1.1%	Rather not
75	▲ 1	Mortis	48.7%	145786	100	3.8%	Rather not
76	▼ 1	Jessie	49.0%	25103	100	0.7%	Rather not
77	–	Bonnie	49.3%	5512	84	0.1%	Rather not
78	–	Mandy	48.4%	18314	100	0.5%	Rather not
79	–	Spike	47.7%	46672	100	1.2%	Rather not
80	–	Byron	47.2%	21173	100	0.6%	Rather not
81	▲ 1	Nani	47.0%	9412	92	0.2%	Rather not
82	▼ 1	Penny	46.7%	14675	99	0.4%	Rather not
83	▲ 1	Dynamike	46.3%	66807	100	1.8%	Rather not
84	▼ 1	Brock	46.1%	61175	100	1.6%	Rather not
85	–	Darryl	45.5%	27687	100	0.7%	Rather not
86	–	Mr. P	46.1%	4417	81	0.1%	Rather not
87	–	Belle	45.6%	6154	86	0.2%	Rather not
88	▲ 1	Gus	45.2%	8366	90	0.2%	Rather not
89	▼ 1	Leon	44.8%	20539	100	0.5%	Rather not
90	–	Piper	44.5%	17090	100	0.5%	Rather not
91	–	Grom	44.5%	8061	90	0.2%	Rather not
92	–	Frank	43.2%	89596	100	2.4%	Rather not
93	–	Chuck	44.3%	2713	73	0.1%	Rather not
94	–	El Primo	42.9%	63187	100	1.7%	Rather not
95	–	Barley	42.7%	14761	99	0.4%	Rather not
96	–	Crow	41.8%	65886	100	1.7%	Rather not
97	–	8-Bit	41.4%	39222	100	1.0%	Rather not
98	▲ 2	Nita	41.1%	52873	100	1.4%	Rather not
99	▼ 1	Gene	41.7%	5592	84	0.1%	Rather not
100	▼ 1	Rico	40.9%	117045	100	3.1%	Rather not
101	–	Colt	40.6%	107324	100	2.8%	Rather not
102	–	Angelo	41.4%	2685	73	0.1%	Rather not
103	–	Surge	39.9%	129093	100	3.4%	Rather not
104	–	Colette	38.4%	49012	100	1.3%	Rather not
105	–	Edgar	37.8%	216157	100	5.7%	Rather not
106	–	Shelly	30.8%	89034	100	2.3%	Rather not