Brawl Ball

Pinhole Punt

394,254 battles collected on this map.

OPEN — more choice than on most maps: 65 of 106 brawlers above 50%.

Recommendation

Damage Dealer 16188 games

Damage Dealer 15063 games

Damage Dealer 4174 games

Damage Dealer 10444 games

Controller 12216 games

Damage Dealer 9589 games

Damage Dealer 26701 games

Controller 104720 games

Controller 18502 games

Controller 9033 games

Controller 5571 games

Trust

Solid

54.9%Win rate

Controller 19918 games

Damage Dealer 16465 games

Controller 17629 games

What the rating, star, trust and the tags mean

Strong pickHow the brawler stands on this map compared to the whole mode (Brawl Ball): Strong pick is the top tenth of all map/brawler rows, Good pick the top quarter, Solid the upper half, Rather not the rest. What is measured is the cautiously computed win rate (Wilson lower bound), the same number the cards are sorted by — not the percentage shown beside it. The thresholds come from the field rather than from fixed percentages: the modes sit at different levels, and in Showdown the number counts trophy gains rather than wins. Not to be confused with the tier list — that ranks a brawler by how many maps of the rotation he is usable on, across all maps together. A Rather not among the recommended eight therefore does not mean “played badly”, but: this map has nothing better to offer.

TrustHow dependable the win rate next to it is, 0–100. Depends purely on the number of games — not on how good the brawler is.

Carry — becomes star player unusually often on this map: he deals the damage and takes the objective. The game runs through him.

Enabler — rarely becomes star player: he clears the way, heals, controls, and others do the scoring. This is no verdict on his strength — how good he is here is the win rate on the card. Measured across 1,620 map/brawler rows, enablers win on average 3.8 points less often than carries, but the star rate explains only 11% of the differences: there are plenty of strong enablers and weak carries. The star says how a brawler wins, not whether.

Hidden gems & traps

From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.

Underrated

Ash 62.8%Winrate 10,603 games

Gigi 60.7%Winrate 7,993 games

Trunk 58.5%Winrate 6,726 games

Buster 58.7%Winrate 4,792 games

Overrated

Edgar 39.1%Winrate 138,885 games

Surge 42.4%Winrate 87,015 games

Mortis 47.7%Winrate 84,714 games

Rico 42.1%Winrate 76,961 games

If you queue as three

The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.

Searched freely across 9,620 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 1,442 real line-ups.

75.0% expected

75.0% expected

74.9% expected

74.9% expected

74.8% expected

74.7% expected

How these numbers are arrived at

What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.

Best · on this map. All 9,620 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 1,442 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.

What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (36 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.

All brawlers on this map

Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.

#		Brawler	Win rate	Games	Trust	Pick rate	Rating
1	–	Bolt	65.6%	19984	100	0.8%	Strong pick
2	–	Nori	62.3%	82941	100	3.5%	Strong pick
3	▲ 1	Starr Nova	62.3%	40383	100	1.7%	Strong pick
4	▼ 1	Ash	62.8%	10603	94	0.4%	Strong pick
5	–	Damian	62.2%	20435	100	0.9%	Strong pick
6	–	Wendy	60.1%	145037	100	6.1%	Strong pick
7	–	Gigi	60.7%	7993	90	0.3%	Strong pick
8	–	Lumi	59.8%	16188	100	0.7%	Strong pick
9	–	Doug	58.7%	12407	96	0.5%	Good pick
10	–	Clancy	58.1%	15063	99	0.6%	Good pick
11	▲ 1	Trunk	58.5%	6726	87	0.3%	Good pick
12	▲ 1	Buster	58.7%	4792	82	0.2%	Good pick
13	▼ 2	R-T	58.9%	4174	80	0.2%	Good pick
14	–	Moe	57.6%	10444	94	0.4%	Good pick
15	▲ 2	Lou	57.2%	12216	96	0.5%	Good pick
16	▼ 1	Pierce	56.9%	20568	100	0.9%	Good pick
17	▼ 1	Ollie	58.1%	3518	77	0.1%	Good pick
18	▲ 1	Pearl	56.9%	9589	92	0.4%	Good pick
19	▲ 5	Sirius	56.5%	14228	98	0.6%	Good pick
20	–	Mina	56.2%	21778	100	0.9%	Good pick
21	▼ 3	Chester	56.0%	26701	100	1.1%	Good pick
22	▼ 1	Glowy	57.0%	4629	81	0.2%	Good pick
23	▼ 1	Draco	56.8%	5828	85	0.2%	Good pick
24	▲ 1	Griff	55.3%	104720	100	4.4%	Good pick
25	▼ 2	Otis	55.7%	18502	100	0.8%	Good pick
26	–	Finx	56.3%	4802	82	0.2%	Solid
27	–	Ruffs	55.8%	6485	86	0.3%	Solid
28	–	Sandy	55.6%	9033	91	0.4%	Solid
29	–	Kaze	55.4%	11428	95	0.5%	Solid
30	▲ 7	Melodie	55.1%	13497	97	0.6%	Solid
31	–	Alli	55.6%	5268	83	0.2%	Solid
32	▼ 2	Meeple	54.9%	10185	93	0.4%	Solid
33	▼ 1	Charlie	54.9%	5571	84	0.2%	Solid
34	▲ 1	Bo	54.2%	19918	100	0.8%	Solid
35	▼ 1	Ziggy	55.3%	3488	77	0.1%	Solid
36	▼ 3	Jae-Yong	55.3%	3272	76	0.1%	Solid
37	▼ 1	Tara	54.1%	16465	100	0.7%	Solid
38	▲ 2	Kenji	53.7%	45543	100	1.9%	Solid
39	▼ 1	Gale	53.8%	17629	100	0.7%	Solid
40	▲ 3	Sam	54.4%	4840	82	0.2%	Solid
41	▼ 2	Jacky	53.9%	9584	92	0.4%	Solid
42	▼ 1	Cordelius	53.4%	12975	97	0.5%	Solid
43	▲ 3	Amber	53.5%	7273	88	0.3%	Solid
44	▲ 1	Maisie	53.2%	9831	93	0.4%	Solid
45	▼ 3	Meg	52.6%	34679	100	1.5%	Solid
46	▲ 16	Hank	53.4%	5264	83	0.2%	Solid
47	▼ 3	Stu	52.4%	29507	100	1.2%	Solid
48	▼ 1	Willow	53.2%	5437	84	0.2%	Solid
49	▲ 1	Gray	52.8%	9173	92	0.4%	Solid
50	▼ 2	Shade	52.7%	9894	93	0.4%	Solid
51	▼ 2	Max	52.1%	30579	100	1.3%	Solid
52	▼ 1	Buzz	52.0%	18790	100	0.8%	Solid
53	▲ 1	Juju	53.5%	1594	65	0.1%	Solid
54	▼ 1	Carl	51.2%	19575	100	0.8%	Solid
55	▲ 2	Bibi	50.4%	96948	100	4.1%	Solid
56	▲ 3	Pam	51.5%	4262	80	0.2%	Solid
57	▼ 5	Fang	50.4%	38503	100	1.6%	Solid
58	▼ 3	Najia	51.4%	4090	80	0.2%	Solid
59	▼ 3	Kit	50.7%	11256	95	0.5%	Solid
60	▼ 2	Sprout	50.9%	6950	88	0.3%	Solid
61	▼ 1	Bea	50.5%	11363	95	0.5%	Rather not
62	▲ 10	Tick	50.2%	20310	100	0.9%	Rather not
63	▲ 2	Janet	51.4%	2808	74	0.1%	Rather not
64	▼ 3	Lily	50.5%	7504	89	0.3%	Rather not
65	▼ 2	Bull	49.4%	47305	100	2.0%	Rather not
66	–	Emz	49.3%	69406	100	2.9%	Rather not
67	▼ 3	Lola	50.5%	3605	78	0.2%	Rather not
68	▲ 3	Eve	50.0%	2301	71	0.1%	Rather not
69	▼ 2	Poco	48.6%	23365	100	1.0%	Rather not
70	▼ 1	Larry & Lawrie	49.3%	3815	79	0.2%	Rather not
71	▼ 3	Mortis	47.7%	84714	100	3.6%	Rather not
72	▲ 3	Rosa	47.9%	9605	92	0.4%	Rather not
73	▲ 9	Squeak	47.8%	10125	93	0.4%	Rather not
74	▼ 1	Mandy	47.7%	9175	92	0.4%	Rather not
75	▲ 1	Mico	48.4%	2799	74	0.1%	Rather not
76	▼ 6	Spike	47.1%	29333	100	1.2%	Rather not
77	▲ 4	Berry	47.4%	6870	87	0.3%	Rather not
78	▼ 4	Brock	46.8%	40083	100	1.7%	Rather not
79	▼ 2	Jessie	46.7%	14848	99	0.6%	Rather not
80	▼ 2	Bonnie	47.2%	3094	75	0.1%	Rather not
81	▼ 2	Byron	45.9%	12993	97	0.5%	Rather not
82	▼ 2	Darryl	45.3%	18437	100	0.8%	Rather not
83	▲ 2	Leon	44.8%	13453	97	0.6%	Rather not
84	▼ 1	Frank	44.3%	55528	100	2.3%	Rather not
85	▲ 2	Penny	44.7%	8169	90	0.3%	Rather not
86	–	Chuck	45.5%	1684	66	0.1%	Rather not
87	▼ 3	8-Bit	44.0%	27347	100	1.2%	Rather not
88	▲ 4	Nani	44.3%	4689	82	0.2%	Rather not
89	–	Belle	44.3%	3951	79	0.2%	Rather not
90	–	Gus	43.9%	5088	83	0.2%	Rather not
91	▲ 3	Dynamike	42.8%	35257	100	1.5%	Rather not
92	▼ 4	Surge	42.4%	87015	100	3.7%	Rather not
93	–	Crow	42.2%	41362	100	1.7%	Rather not
94	▼ 3	Rico	42.1%	76961	100	3.3%	Rather not
95	–	Mr. P	43.1%	2579	73	0.1%	Rather not
96	–	Piper	42.3%	9634	92	0.4%	Rather not
97	–	Colt	41.2%	68364	100	2.9%	Rather not
98	–	Grom	41.3%	4434	81	0.2%	Rather not
99	▲ 1	El Primo	40.1%	34546	100	1.5%	Rather not
100	▲ 1	Nita	39.7%	32794	100	1.4%	Rather not
101	▲ 1	Gene	40.0%	3340	77	0.1%	Rather not
102	▼ 3	Edgar	39.1%	138885	100	5.9%	Rather not
103	–	Colette	38.8%	30276	100	1.3%	Rather not
104	–	Angelo	38.2%	1430	64	0.1%	Rather not
105	–	Barley	36.8%	7700	89	0.3%	Rather not
106	–	Shelly	30.0%	54145	100	2.3%	Rather not