
Heist
109 battles collected on this map.
Short rounds Median 73 s out of 73–92 s in this mode. Early pressure pays off — anyone looking to outplay is playing against the map.
three-brawler line-ups that actually exist — counted across the whole mode.
This is for Heist as a whole, not for this map. There are not enough numbers here yet for a map-specific calculation — the calibration needs line-ups actually played on this map. As soon as enough accumulate, the calculation for Pit Stop appears in this spot; until then the mode-wide list is the best available answer.
Out of 96 line-ups with 120+ games.
What you see here. three-brawler line-ups that actually exist, counted across the whole mode — not for this map. There is no basis for a map-specific calculation yet: the calibration needs line-ups played on this map. The measured number is therefore not a prediction for Pit Stop, but the answer to what generally wins in Heist.
Measured · in the mode. The strongest three-brawler line-ups in this mode, out of 96 with at least 120 games. The number is deliberately cautious: unchecked, the luckiest outlier would sit on top. Per mode, not per map — on a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a number of its own.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Buzz |
73.8% | 42 | 11 | 6.4% | Solid | ||
| 2 | – | Rico |
69.8% | 43 | 11 | 6.6% | Solid | ||
| 3 | – | Lumi |
70.4% | 27 | 4 | 4.1% | Solid | ||
| 4 | – | Meeple |
66.7% | 30 | 6 | 4.6% | Solid | ||
| 5 | ▲ 2 | Edgar |
63.6% | 22 | 1 | 3.4% | Solid | ||
| 6 | ▼ 1 | Kaze |
56.8% | 37 | 9 | 5.7% | Solid | ||
| 7 | ▼ 1 | Griff |
54.0% | 50 | 14 | 7.6% | Solid | ||
| 8 | ▲ 1 | Bibi |
56.7% | 30 | 6 | 4.6% | Solid | ||
| 9 | ▼ 1 | Shade |
58.8% | 17 | 0 | 2.6% | Rather not | ||
| 10 | – | Mico |
48.4% | 31 | 7 | 4.7% | Rather not | ||
| 11 | NEW | Bull |
50.0% | 12 | 0 | 1.8% | Rather not | ||
| 12 | ▼ 1 | Crow |
50.0% | 12 | 0 | 1.8% | Rather not | ||
| 13 | ▼ 1 | Otis |
42.9% | 14 | 0 | 2.1% | Rather not | ||
| 14 | ▼ 1 | Nita |
42.1% | 19 | 0 | 2.9% | Rather not | ||
| 15 | – | Surge |
41.7% | 24 | 3 | 3.7% | Rather not | ||
| 16 | ▼ 2 | Ruffs |
38.9% | 18 | 0 | 2.8% | Rather not | ||
| 17 | ▼ 1 | Melodie |
33.3% | 12 | 0 | 1.8% | Rather not | ||
| 18 | ▼ 1 | Colt |
40.6% | 32 | 7 | 4.9% | Rather not | ||
| 19 | ▼ 1 | Cordelius |
39.3% | 28 | 5 | 4.3% | Rather not | ||
| 20 | ▼ 1 | Starr Nova |
31.3% | 16 | 0 | 2.4% | Rather not | ||
| 21 | ▼ 1 | Berry |
28.6% | 14 | 0 | 2.1% | Rather not | ||
| 22 | ▼ 1 | 8-Bit |
23.1% | 13 | 0 | 2.0% | Rather not | ||
| 23 | ▼ 1 | Kit |
28.6% | 21 | 1 | 3.2% | Rather not |