Heist

Pit Stop

87,272 battles collected on this map — ranked only.

TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 19 of 102 brawlers above 50%.

Recommendation for Gold

Short rounds Median 79 s out of 78–98 s in this mode. Early pressure pays off — anyone looking to outplay is playing against the map.

Tank short rounds 5368 games

Damage Dealer 14246 games

Damage Dealer 969 games

Controller 15223 games

Controller 13663 games

Damage Dealer 1206 games

Artillery 10556 games

Damage Dealer 2768 games

Damage Dealer 1585 games

Controller 1793 games

Controller 10239 games

Damage Dealer 4954 games

Damage Dealer 14986 games

Controller 5221 games

Trust

Solid

43.9%Win rate

What the rating, star, trust and the tags mean

Strong pickThe rank on this map among all map/brawler rows of the mode (Heist): Strong pick top tenth, Good pick top quarter, Solid upper half, Rather not the rest. The thresholds come from the field — the exact values are in the badge's tooltip. Not the tier list: that counts how many maps of the rotation a brawler is usable on. Rather not among the recommended eight therefore does not mean “bad”, but: this map has nothing better to offer.

TrustHow dependable the win rate next to it is, 0–100. Depends purely on the number of games — not on how good the brawler is.

Carry — becomes star player unusually often on this map: he deals the damage and takes the objective. The game runs through him.

short roundsOf these recommendations he benefits most from the round ending quickly. The comparison is within these eight, not across the whole map: in absolute terms almost every recommended pick carries the “short” label, because rounds won quickly are rounds won clearly, and that drives the win rate. long rounds only appears when the value is actually negative — where everyone benefits from a short round, nobody gets the opposite label.

Hidden gems & traps

From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.

Underrated

R-T 58.2%Winrate 969 games

Gigi 59.4%Winrate 552 games

Doug 53.8%Winrate 801 games

Overrated

Brock 43.2%Winrate 15,672 games

Colt 44.5%Winrate 14,986 games

Willow 43.5%Winrate 12,531 games

Rico 43.3%Winrate 10,708 games

If you queue as three

three-brawler line-ups that actually exist — counted across the whole mode.

This is for Heist as a whole, not for this map. There are not enough numbers here yet for a map-specific calculation — the calibration needs line-ups actually played on this map. As soon as enough accumulate, the calculation for Pit Stop appears in this spot; until then the mode-wide list is the best available answer.

Out of 1,392 line-ups with 120+ games. Computed for Gold.

Mico

Nita

Nori

75.7% 414 games

Cordelius

Edgar

Mico

75.1% 202 games

Bull

Mico

Nori

74.7% 289 games

Chuck

Jessie

Nori

74.2% 579 games

Cordelius

Edgar

Nori

73.8% 310 games

Griff

Mico

Nori

73.6% 655 games

How these numbers are arrived at

What you see here. three-brawler line-ups that actually exist, counted across the whole mode — not for this map. There is no basis for a map-specific calculation yet: the calibration needs line-ups played on this map. The measured number is therefore not a prediction for Pit Stop, but the answer to what generally wins in Heist.

Measured · in the mode. The strongest three-brawler line-ups in this mode, out of 1,392 with at least 120 games. The number is deliberately cautious: unchecked, the luckiest outlier would sit on top. Per mode, not per map — on a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a number of its own.

All brawlers on this map

Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.

#		Brawler	Win rate	Games	Trust	Pick rate	Rating
1	–	Mico	62.0%	23601	100	5.4%	Strong pick
2	–	Nori	60.0%	38586	100	8.9%	Strong pick
3	▲ 1	Bull	59.1%	8704	91	2.0%	Strong pick
4	▼ 1	Edgar	58.0%	58170	100	13.4%	Strong pick
5	▲ 1	Bibi	57.5%	5368	84	1.2%	Strong pick
6	▼ 1	Shade	56.8%	7024	88	1.6%	Strong pick
7	–	Nita	56.2%	14246	98	3.3%	Strong pick
8	–	Cordelius	56.0%	3664	78	0.8%	Strong pick
9	▲ 2	R-T	58.2%	969	58	0.2%	Strong pick
10	–	Gigi	59.4%	552	50	0.1%	Strong pick
11	▼ 2	Berry	55.1%	4878	82	1.1%	Strong pick
12	▲ 1	Melodie	53.5%	3089	75	0.7%	Good pick
13	▼ 1	Dynamike	52.5%	9267	92	2.1%	Good pick
14	–	Griff	52.2%	15223	99	3.5%	Good pick
15	–	Doug	53.8%	801	55	0.2%	Good pick
16	▲ 1	Sam	57.5%	207	35	0.0%	Good pick
17	–	Jessie	49.9%	13663	98	3.2%	Good pick
18	▲ 5	Hank	54.1%	453	47	0.1%	Good pick
19	▼ 2	Kaze	49.2%	27306	100	6.3%	Good pick
20	▲ 1	Starr Nova	49.6%	5635	84	1.3%	Good pick
21	▼ 3	Sirius	49.8%	2584	73	0.6%	Good pick
22	▼ 2	Lumi	50.7%	1206	61	0.3%	Good pick
23	▲ 1	Buzz	50.1%	1890	68	0.4%	Good pick
24	▲ 1	Penny	47.9%	10556	94	2.4%	Solid
25	▼ 2	Trunk	48.0%	7887	89	1.8%	Solid
26	▲ 1	Carl	48.3%	2768	74	0.6%	Solid
27	▼ 1	Lily	48.3%	2501	72	0.6%	Solid
28	–	Chester	47.2%	1585	65	0.4%	Solid
29	▲ 5	Otis	46.6%	1793	67	0.4%	Solid
30	▲ 6	Darryl	46.4%	1593	65	0.4%	Solid
31	▼ 1	Emz	45.2%	10239	93	2.4%	Solid
32	▼ 3	Kit	46.5%	961	58	0.2%	Solid
33	▼ 1	Bolt	45.7%	2504	72	0.6%	Solid
34	▲ 1	Surge	45.2%	4954	82	1.1%	Solid
35	▼ 2	Colt	44.5%	14986	99	3.5%	Solid
36	▲ 2	Juju	47.6%	231	37	0.1%	Solid
37	▲ 1	El Primo	45.5%	1711	67	0.4%	Solid
38	–	Barley	45.1%	2123	70	0.5%	Solid
39	▼ 8	Ruffs	46.9%	192	34	0.0%	Solid
40	▲ 2	Bo	43.9%	5221	83	1.2%	Solid
41	▲ 2	8-Bit	43.6%	9668	92	2.2%	Solid
42	▼ 1	Willow	43.5%	12531	96	2.9%	Solid
43	▲ 1	Rico	43.3%	10708	94	2.5%	Solid
44	▲ 1	Brock	43.2%	15672	100	3.6%	Solid
45	▼ 5	Jae-Yong	45.2%	31	7	0.0%	Solid
46	–	Ollie	44.0%	25	3	0.0%	Solid
47	–	Moe	43.7%	222	36	0.1%	Solid
48	▲ 10	Clancy	43.5%	704	53	0.2%	Rather not
49	–	Finx	43.1%	130	28	0.0%	Rather not
50	▲ 3	Buster	38.2%	34	8	0.0%	Rather not
51	▼ 3	Alli	42.9%	205	35	0.0%	Rather not
52	▼ 1	Meeple	42.6%	884	57	0.2%	Rather not
53	▲ 3	Lola	42.6%	235	37	0.1%	Rather not
54	▼ 1	Amber	42.2%	916	57	0.2%	Rather not
55	▼ 5	Draco	42.0%	281	40	0.1%	Rather not
56	▲ 5	Kenji	41.6%	1532	65	0.4%	Rather not
57	▲ 2	Mandy	41.1%	3139	76	0.7%	Rather not
58	▼ 3	Chuck	40.9%	3843	79	0.9%	Rather not
59	▲ 3	Crow	40.5%	8744	91	2.0%	Rather not
60	▼ 8	Pierce	41.2%	1285	62	0.3%	Rather not
61	▼ 3	Nani	41.2%	851	56	0.2%	Rather not
62	▼ 2	Stu	40.7%	907	57	0.2%	Rather not
63	▲ 5	Frank	40.3%	2304	71	0.5%	Rather not
64	▲ 2	Angelo	36.8%	114	26	0.0%	Rather not
65	–	Colette	39.7%	5397	84	1.2%	Rather not
66	▼ 3	Damian	39.7%	380	44	0.1%	Rather not
67	▲ 7	Mina	38.8%	381	44	0.1%	Rather not
68	▲ 4	Larry & Lawrie	38.9%	1186	61	0.3%	Rather not
69	▲ 4	Spike	38.6%	3921	79	0.9%	Rather not
70	▼ 4	Sprout	38.4%	537	49	0.1%	Rather not
71	▼ 1	Fang	38.6%	1570	65	0.4%	Rather not
72	▲ 3	Ziggy	36.9%	260	38	0.1%	Rather not
73	▼ 4	Janet	34.3%	140	29	0.0%	Rather not
74	▼ 3	Gray	37.6%	407	45	0.1%	Rather not
75	▼ 10	Mortis	38.2%	1611	66	0.4%	Rather not
76	–	Gale	37.3%	616	51	0.1%	Rather not
77	▲ 2	Pearl	36.5%	887	57	0.2%	Rather not
78	▲ 4	Ash	35.9%	647	52	0.1%	Rather not
79	▲ 1	Mr. P	35.2%	492	48	0.1%	Rather not
80	▼ 3	Najia	35.2%	546	49	0.1%	Rather not
81	–	Grom	35.6%	964	58	0.2%	Rather not
82	▼ 4	Glowy	31.7%	227	36	0.1%	Rather not
83	▲ 1	Max	34.2%	1364	63	0.3%	Rather not
84	▲ 1	Meg	33.8%	1230	62	0.3%	Rather not
85	▲ 3	Shelly	33.8%	1968	69	0.5%	Rather not
86	▲ 3	Maisie	30.0%	283	40	0.1%	Rather not
87	▼ 1	Leon	33.0%	1492	65	0.3%	Rather not
88	▼ 6	Gus	27.5%	222	36	0.1%	Rather not
89	▲ 2	Tick	32.9%	3120	76	0.7%	Rather not
90	▼ 3	Belle	29.6%	416	45	0.1%	Rather not
91	▲ 1	Squeak	31.5%	1685	66	0.4%	Rather not
92	▼ 1	Charlie	28.7%	495	48	0.1%	Rather not
93	–	Jacky	27.8%	425	46	0.1%	Rather not
94	–	Tara	28.9%	806	55	0.2%	Rather not
95	▲ 1	Lou	25.8%	476	47	0.1%	Rather not
96	▲ 2	Bea	26.4%	579	50	0.1%	Rather not
97	▼ 2	Bonnie	24.5%	376	44	0.1%	Rather not
98	▲ 1	Eve	23.4%	329	42	0.1%	Rather not
99	▼ 2	Pam	20.1%	269	39	0.1%	Rather not
100	–	Poco	22.3%	395	45	0.1%	Rather not
101	–	Rosa	23.2%	462	47	0.1%	Rather not
102	–	Sandy	17.5%	275	39	0.1%	Rather not
103	–	Byron	24.0%	1084	60	0.3%	Rather not
104	–	Piper	23.9%	1248	62	0.3%	Rather not
105	–	Gene	8.2%	306	41	0.1%	Rather not