Basket Brawl

Pocket Pass

25,868 battles collected on this map.

TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 46 of 106 brawlers above 50%.

Recommendation

Damage Dealer 835 games

Damage Dealer 414 games

Controller 7062 games

Damage Dealer 2024 games

Controller 2274 games

Damage Dealer 1171 games

Controller 1044 games

Damage Dealer 275 games

Damage Dealer 2126 games

Damage Dealer 389 games

What the rating, star, trust and the tags mean

Strong pickHow the brawler stands on this map compared to the whole mode (Basket Brawl): Strong pick is the top tenth of all map/brawler rows, Good pick the top quarter, Solid the upper half, Rather not the rest. What is measured is the cautiously computed win rate (Wilson lower bound), the same number the cards are sorted by — not the percentage shown beside it. The thresholds come from the field rather than from fixed percentages: the modes sit at different levels, and in Showdown the number counts trophy gains rather than wins. Not to be confused with the tier list — that ranks a brawler by how many maps of the rotation he is usable on, across all maps together. A Rather not among the recommended eight therefore does not mean “played badly”, but: this map has nothing better to offer.

TrustHow dependable the win rate next to it is, 0–100. Depends purely on the number of games — not on how good the brawler is.

Carry — becomes star player unusually often on this map: he deals the damage and takes the objective. The game runs through him.

Enabler — rarely becomes star player: he clears the way, heals, controls, and others do the scoring. This is no verdict on his strength — how good he is here is the win rate on the card. Measured across 1,620 map/brawler rows, enablers win on average 3.8 points less often than carries, but the star rate explains only 11% of the differences: there are plenty of strong enablers and weak carries. The star says how a brawler wins, not whether.

Hidden gems & traps

From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.

Underrated

Wendy 74.4%Winrate 657 games

Sam 63.8%Winrate 724 games

Lumi 59.9%Winrate 835 games

Gigi 58.8%Winrate 697 games

Overrated

Edgar 44.7%Winrate 6,577 games

Colt 44.8%Winrate 4,024 games

Emz 47.7%Winrate 3,902 games

Rico 45.2%Winrate 3,420 games

All brawlers on this map

Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.

#		Brawler	Win rate	Games	Trust	Pick rate	Rating
1	–	Wendy	74.4%	657	52	0.4%	Strong pick
2	–	Damian	65.5%	2323	71	1.5%	Strong pick
3	–	Nori	62.7%	3591	78	2.3%	Strong pick
4	–	Starr Nova	61.6%	2477	72	1.6%	Strong pick
5	▲ 2	Sam	63.8%	724	54	0.5%	Strong pick
6	▼ 1	Rosa	58.8%	5359	84	3.5%	Strong pick
7	▲ 1	Bolt	60.7%	1121	60	0.7%	Strong pick
8	▼ 2	Doug	59.7%	1149	61	0.7%	Strong pick
9	–	Lumi	59.9%	835	56	0.5%	Strong pick
10	–	Mina	57.6%	1269	62	0.8%	Strong pick
11	▲ 1	Pierce	56.7%	1770	67	1.1%	Strong pick
12	▼ 1	Gigi	58.8%	697	53	0.4%	Strong pick
13	▲ 1	R-T	60.9%	414	45	0.3%	Good pick
14	▲ 1	Sirius	56.2%	1121	60	0.7%	Good pick
15	▼ 2	Griff	53.7%	7062	88	4.6%	Good pick
16	▲ 5	Trunk	57.3%	648	52	0.4%	Good pick
17	▲ 2	Frank	53.1%	4678	82	3.0%	Good pick
18	–	Clancy	53.9%	2024	69	1.3%	Good pick
19	▼ 2	Gale	53.7%	2274	71	1.5%	Good pick
20	▼ 4	Draco	56.0%	697	53	0.4%	Good pick
21	▼ 1	Kaze	55.4%	784	55	0.5%	Good pick
22	▲ 3	Chester	53.8%	1171	61	0.8%	Good pick
23	▲ 1	Shade	54.6%	725	54	0.5%	Good pick
24	▼ 2	Glowy	56.6%	341	42	0.2%	Good pick
25	▲ 1	Bibi	50.6%	6724	87	4.3%	Good pick
26	▲ 2	Fang	50.8%	4802	82	3.1%	Good pick
27	▼ 4	Cordelius	52.2%	1213	61	0.8%	Good pick
28	▼ 1	Jacky	52.1%	1248	62	0.8%	Good pick
29	▲ 8	Sprout	53.7%	544	49	0.4%	Solid
30	▼ 1	Kenji	50.7%	3065	75	2.0%	Solid
31	▲ 2	Kit	52.9%	696	53	0.4%	Solid
32	▼ 2	Otis	52.0%	1044	59	0.7%	Solid
33	▲ 1	Amber	52.7%	715	54	0.5%	Solid
34	▲ 2	Meg	50.7%	2516	72	1.6%	Solid
35	▲ 9	Hank	53.6%	435	46	0.3%	Solid
36	▼ 4	Lola	55.3%	275	39	0.2%	Solid
37	▲ 6	Finx	54.9%	297	40	0.2%	Solid
38	▲ 1	8-Bit	50.2%	2126	70	1.4%	Solid
39	▼ 6	Moe	53.5%	389	44	0.3%	Solid
40	▼ 5	Stu	50.6%	1313	63	0.8%	Solid
41	▲ 1	Surge	49.0%	4797	82	3.1%	Solid
42	▼ 1	Bull	49.4%	2753	74	1.8%	Solid
43	▼ 5	Buzz	49.7%	1999	69	1.3%	Solid
44	▲ 4	Bo	50.1%	1056	59	0.7%	Solid
45	▲ 2	Janet	53.8%	210	35	0.1%	Solid
46	▼ 7	Willow	51.2%	451	47	0.3%	Solid
47	▼ 3	Mico	51.9%	283	40	0.2%	Solid
48	▼ 2	Emz	47.7%	3902	79	2.5%	Solid
49	▲ 3	Ash	49.1%	697	53	0.4%	Solid
50	–	Nita	47.8%	1862	68	1.2%	Solid
51	▲ 2	El Primo	47.3%	3277	76	2.1%	Solid
52	▲ 2	Lou	48.4%	1031	59	0.7%	Solid
53	▲ 6	Meeple	50.1%	345	43	0.2%	Solid
54	▼ 3	Jessie	47.7%	1650	66	1.1%	Solid
55	▲ 3	Colette	47.1%	2623	73	1.7%	Solid
56	▼ 1	Darryl	47.1%	1561	65	1.0%	Rather not
57	▲ 3	Sandy	47.9%	752	54	0.5%	Rather not
58	▼ 10	Max	47.0%	1611	66	1.0%	Rather not
59	▼ 1	Juju	51.3%	158	31	0.1%	Rather not
60	–	Tara	46.7%	1525	65	1.0%	Rather not
61	▲ 2	Ziggy	48.9%	278	39	0.2%	Rather not
62	▲ 6	Charlie	47.5%	598	51	0.4%	Rather not
63	▼ 2	Spike	46.2%	2043	69	1.3%	Rather not
64	▼ 5	Jae-Yong	49.3%	213	35	0.1%	Rather not
65	▲ 9	Ruffs	48.1%	283	40	0.2%	Rather not
66	▲ 4	Rico	45.2%	3420	77	2.2%	Rather not
67	▼ 1	Edgar	44.7%	6577	87	4.2%	Rather not
68	▼ 4	Colt	44.8%	4024	79	2.6%	Rather not
69	▲ 8	Gus	46.5%	368	44	0.2%	Rather not
70	▲ 6	Pearl	45.6%	665	52	0.4%	Rather not
71	▼ 1	Mortis	44.1%	3226	76	2.1%	Rather not
72	▼ 6	Maisie	45.0%	921	57	0.6%	Rather not
73	▼ 3	Alli	46.3%	205	35	0.1%	Rather not
74	▼ 2	Mandy	45.0%	809	55	0.5%	Rather not
75	▼ 10	Lily	44.8%	681	53	0.4%	Rather not
76	▼ 3	Pam	44.8%	543	49	0.3%	Rather not
77	▲ 10	Bea	43.9%	1229	62	0.8%	Rather not
78	▼ 3	Buster	43.9%	660	52	0.4%	Rather not
79	▲ 5	Chuck	44.3%	183	33	0.1%	Rather not
80	▼ 2	Najia	44.0%	225	36	0.1%	Rather not
81	▼ 2	Nani	43.8%	347	43	0.2%	Rather not
82	▲ 3	Gray	43.0%	321	42	0.2%	Rather not
83	▼ 1	Carl	42.4%	1355	63	0.9%	Rather not
84	▼ 2	Ollie	42.9%	434	46	0.3%	Rather not
85	▼ 3	Poco	42.1%	1656	66	1.1%	Rather not
86	–	Dynamike	41.6%	2266	71	1.5%	Rather not
87	▲ 2	Larry & Lawrie	42.0%	426	46	0.3%	Rather not
88	▲ 2	Angelo	39.0%	105	25	0.1%	Rather not
89	▼ 1	Shelly	40.6%	2312	71	1.5%	Rather not
90	▲ 3	Penny	40.8%	693	53	0.4%	Rather not
91	–	Crow	40.1%	2135	70	1.4%	Rather not
92	▼ 12	Grom	39.5%	415	45	0.3%	Rather not
93	▲ 1	Berry	39.5%	765	55	0.5%	Rather not
94	▲ 1	Melodie	39.4%	713	53	0.5%	Rather not
95	▼ 3	Belle	38.3%	407	45	0.3%	Rather not
96	–	Squeak	38.4%	914	57	0.6%	Rather not
97	–	Leon	38.4%	1096	60	0.7%	Rather not
98	▲ 2	Brock	36.7%	2482	72	1.6%	Rather not
99	▼ 1	Byron	36.0%	713	53	0.5%	Rather not
100	▼ 1	Bonnie	34.7%	383	44	0.2%	Rather not
101	–	Eve	34.1%	317	41	0.2%	Rather not
102	▲ 1	Gene	33.3%	333	42	0.2%	Rather not
103	–	Tick	35.0%	1675	66	1.1%	Rather not
104	▲ 3	Mr. P	32.9%	337	42	0.2%	Rather not
105	▼ 3	Barley	33.5%	734	54	0.5%	Rather not
106	▼ 1	Piper	33.3%	867	56	0.6%	Rather not