Basket Brawl

Pocket Pass

24,107 battles collected on this map.

TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 46 of 106 brawlers above 50%.

Recommendation

Damage Dealer 772 games

Damage Dealer 382 games

Controller 6635 games

Damage Dealer 1945 games

Controller 2118 games

Damage Dealer 1119 games

Damage Dealer 262 games

Damage Dealer 374 games

Damage Dealer 1931 games

Trust

Solid

50.0%Win rate

What the rating, star, trust and the tags mean

Strong pickHow the brawler stands on this map compared to the whole mode (Basket Brawl): Strong pick is the top tenth of all map/brawler rows, Good pick the top quarter, Solid the upper half, Rather not the rest. What is measured is the cautiously computed win rate (Wilson lower bound), the same number the cards are sorted by — not the percentage shown beside it. The thresholds come from the field rather than from fixed percentages: the modes sit at different levels, and in Showdown the number counts trophy gains rather than wins. Not to be confused with the tier list — that ranks a brawler by how many maps of the rotation he is usable on, across all maps together. A Rather not among the recommended eight therefore does not mean “played badly”, but: this map has nothing better to offer.

TrustHow dependable the win rate next to it is, 0–100. Depends purely on the number of games — not on how good the brawler is.

Carry — becomes star player unusually often on this map: he deals the damage and takes the objective. The game runs through him.

Enabler — rarely becomes star player: he clears the way, heals, controls, and others do the scoring. This is no verdict on his strength — how good he is here is the win rate on the card. Measured across 1,620 map/brawler rows, enablers win on average 3.8 points less often than carries, but the star rate explains only 11% of the differences: there are plenty of strong enablers and weak carries. The star says how a brawler wins, not whether.

Hidden gems & traps

From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.

Underrated

Wendy 74.4%Winrate 543 games

Sam 63.4%Winrate 661 games

Lumi 60.0%Winrate 772 games

Gigi 59.1%Winrate 657 games

Overrated

Edgar 44.6%Winrate 6,098 games

Colt 45.0%Winrate 3,744 games

Rico 44.8%Winrate 3,151 games

El Primo 47.2%Winrate 3,062 games

All brawlers on this map

Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.

#		Brawler	Win rate	Games	Trust	Pick rate	Rating
1	–	Wendy	74.4%	543	49	0.4%	Strong pick
2	–	Damian	65.4%	2201	70	1.5%	Strong pick
3	–	Nori	62.2%	3216	76	2.2%	Strong pick
4	–	Starr Nova	61.0%	2271	71	1.6%	Strong pick
5	▲ 2	Sam	63.4%	661	52	0.5%	Strong pick
6	▼ 1	Rosa	58.8%	4970	83	3.4%	Strong pick
7	▼ 1	Doug	60.2%	1087	60	0.8%	Strong pick
8	–	Bolt	59.6%	1032	59	0.7%	Strong pick
9	–	Lumi	60.0%	772	55	0.5%	Strong pick
10	–	Mina	57.9%	1191	61	0.8%	Strong pick
11	–	Gigi	59.1%	657	52	0.5%	Strong pick
12	–	Pierce	56.3%	1608	66	1.1%	Good pick
13	▲ 1	R-T	60.5%	382	44	0.3%	Good pick
14	▼ 1	Griff	54.2%	6635	87	4.6%	Good pick
15	–	Sirius	56.1%	1057	59	0.7%	Good pick
16	▲ 1	Clancy	54.3%	1945	68	1.3%	Good pick
17	▲ 5	Trunk	56.9%	601	51	0.4%	Good pick
18	▼ 2	Draco	56.2%	683	53	0.5%	Good pick
19	▼ 2	Gale	53.8%	2118	70	1.5%	Good pick
20	▼ 1	Frank	53.0%	4345	80	3.0%	Good pick
21	▼ 1	Kaze	55.3%	748	54	0.5%	Good pick
22	–	Glowy	58.2%	311	41	0.2%	Good pick
23	▲ 1	Shade	55.0%	685	53	0.5%	Good pick
24	▲ 1	Chester	53.6%	1119	60	0.8%	Good pick
25	▼ 2	Cordelius	53.1%	1120	60	0.8%	Good pick
26	–	Bibi	50.8%	6364	86	4.4%	Good pick
27	–	Jacky	52.6%	1164	61	0.8%	Good pick
28	–	Fang	50.9%	4528	81	3.1%	Good pick
29	–	Kenji	51.0%	2877	74	2.0%	Solid
30	–	Otis	52.3%	995	58	0.7%	Solid
31	–	Lola	56.1%	262	38	0.2%	Solid
32	▲ 2	Amber	52.8%	670	53	0.5%	Solid
33	▲ 2	Meg	50.8%	2350	71	1.6%	Solid
34	–	Kit	52.8%	665	52	0.5%	Solid
35	▼ 3	Moe	54.0%	374	44	0.3%	Solid
36	▲ 1	Sprout	53.0%	508	48	0.4%	Solid
37	▲ 1	Buzz	50.3%	1886	68	1.3%	Solid
38	▼ 3	Stu	50.8%	1212	61	0.8%	Solid
39	▲ 2	Bull	49.8%	2601	73	1.8%	Solid
40	–	8-Bit	50.0%	1931	68	1.3%	Solid
41	▲ 4	Hank	52.8%	400	45	0.3%	Solid
42	▲ 1	Finx	54.0%	274	39	0.2%	Solid
43	▼ 4	Willow	52.2%	425	46	0.3%	Solid
44	▼ 2	Surge	48.8%	4507	81	3.1%	Solid
45	▲ 1	Emz	48.3%	3622	78	2.5%	Solid
46	▲ 1	Bo	49.5%	978	58	0.7%	Solid
47	▲ 1	Janet	53.4%	204	35	0.1%	Solid
48	▼ 4	Mico	52.2%	270	39	0.2%	Solid
49	▲ 2	Jessie	48.4%	1559	65	1.1%	Solid
50	▲ 4	Lou	48.7%	974	58	0.7%	Solid
51	▼ 1	Nita	47.8%	1729	67	1.2%	Solid
52	▼ 3	Max	48.0%	1469	64	1.0%	Solid
53	–	El Primo	47.2%	3062	75	2.1%	Solid
54	▲ 4	Meeple	50.0%	314	41	0.2%	Solid
55	▲ 1	Juju	52.3%	149	30	0.1%	Rather not
56	▲ 2	Colette	47.0%	2438	72	1.7%	Rather not
57	▼ 2	Darryl	47.1%	1455	64	1.0%	Rather not
58	▼ 5	Ash	48.1%	640	52	0.4%	Rather not
59	▼ 1	Tara	47.0%	1430	64	1.0%	Rather not
60	▲ 1	Sandy	47.8%	716	54	0.5%	Rather not
61	▼ 2	Jae-Yong	50.3%	197	34	0.1%	Rather not
62	–	Spike	46.2%	1930	68	1.3%	Rather not
63	–	Ziggy	48.1%	262	38	0.2%	Rather not
64	–	Colt	45.0%	3744	78	2.6%	Rather not
65	▲ 1	Edgar	44.6%	6098	86	4.2%	Rather not
66	▲ 4	Rico	44.8%	3151	76	2.2%	Rather not
67	▼ 2	Lily	45.8%	620	51	0.4%	Rather not
68	▲ 1	Charlie	45.8%	550	50	0.4%	Rather not
69	▲ 5	Ruffs	46.2%	266	39	0.2%	Rather not
70	▼ 4	Maisie	45.1%	854	56	0.6%	Rather not
71	–	Mandy	45.1%	758	54	0.5%	Rather not
72	▼ 2	Alli	46.5%	187	33	0.1%	Rather not
73	▼ 2	Mortis	44.1%	3039	75	2.1%	Rather not
74	▼ 1	Pam	45.4%	496	48	0.3%	Rather not
75	▲ 2	Gus	45.5%	345	43	0.2%	Rather not
76	▼ 1	Buster	44.3%	609	51	0.4%	Rather not
77	▼ 1	Pearl	44.0%	587	51	0.4%	Rather not
78	▲ 1	Nani	44.1%	333	42	0.2%	Rather not
79	▲ 5	Chuck	44.0%	168	32	0.1%	Rather not
80	▼ 2	Najia	43.7%	215	36	0.1%	Rather not
81	▲ 2	Carl	42.7%	1270	62	0.9%	Rather not
82	▲ 5	Bea	42.6%	1114	60	0.8%	Rather not
83	▼ 1	Poco	42.4%	1535	65	1.1%	Rather not
84	▼ 3	Ollie	42.8%	407	45	0.3%	Rather not
85	▲ 1	Dynamike	42.0%	2134	70	1.5%	Rather not
86	▼ 1	Gray	42.3%	298	40	0.2%	Rather not
87	▲ 2	Larry & Lawrie	42.2%	384	44	0.3%	Rather not
88	–	Shelly	41.2%	2169	70	1.5%	Rather not
89	▼ 9	Grom	41.4%	382	44	0.3%	Rather not
90	▲ 1	Crow	40.6%	2014	69	1.4%	Rather not
91	▼ 1	Angelo	37.6%	101	24	0.1%	Rather not
92	▲ 1	Penny	40.4%	646	52	0.4%	Rather not
93	▼ 1	Belle	39.5%	367	44	0.3%	Rather not
94	–	Berry	39.8%	728	54	0.5%	Rather not
95	–	Melodie	39.5%	665	52	0.5%	Rather not
96	▲ 1	Leon	38.9%	1018	59	0.7%	Rather not
97	▼ 1	Squeak	38.3%	869	56	0.6%	Rather not
98	–	Byron	36.3%	650	52	0.4%	Rather not
99	–	Bonnie	34.6%	347	43	0.2%	Rather not
100	–	Brock	36.0%	2267	71	1.6%	Rather not
101	▲ 2	Gene	32.6%	307	41	0.2%	Rather not
102	▲ 2	Tick	34.6%	1534	65	1.1%	Rather not
103	▼ 2	Eve	31.4%	274	39	0.2%	Rather not
104	▼ 2	Barley	33.5%	663	52	0.5%	Rather not
105	▲ 1	Mr. P	31.2%	311	41	0.2%	Rather not
106	▼ 1	Piper	32.8%	819	56	0.6%	Rather not