Heist

Quintillion

156,785 battles collected on this map.

TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 45 of 106 brawlers above 50%.

Recommendation

Damage Dealer 4179 games

Damage Dealer 1926 games

Controller 34351 games

Damage Dealer 15502 games

Controller 5890 games

Damage Dealer 38903 games

Damage Dealer 2039 games

Controller 21549 games

Damage Dealer 2395 games

Controller 49548 games

Damage Dealer 3054 games

Controller 2011 games

Controller 6377 games

Trust

Good pick

50.5%Win rate

What the rating, star, trust and the tags mean

Strong pickHow the brawler stands on this map compared to the whole mode (Heist): Strong pick is the top tenth of all map/brawler rows, Good pick the top quarter, Solid the upper half, Rather not the rest. What is measured is the cautiously computed win rate (Wilson lower bound), the same number the cards are sorted by — not the percentage shown beside it. The thresholds come from the field rather than from fixed percentages: the modes sit at different levels, and in Showdown the number counts trophy gains rather than wins. Not to be confused with the tier list — that ranks a brawler by how many maps of the rotation he is usable on, across all maps together. A Rather not among the recommended eight therefore does not mean “played badly”, but: this map has nothing better to offer.

TrustHow dependable the win rate next to it is, 0–100. Depends purely on the number of games — not on how good the brawler is.

Carry — becomes star player unusually often on this map: he deals the damage and takes the objective. The game runs through him.

Enabler — rarely becomes star player: he clears the way, heals, controls, and others do the scoring. This is no verdict on his strength — how good he is here is the win rate on the card. Measured across 1,620 map/brawler rows, enablers win on average 3.8 points less often than carries, but the star rate explains only 11% of the differences: there are plenty of strong enablers and weak carries. The star says how a brawler wins, not whether.

Hidden gems & traps

From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.

Underrated

Wendy 66.0%Winrate 2,451 games

Lumi 60.4%Winrate 4,179 games

Juju 60.1%Winrate 1,611 games

R-T 59.7%Winrate 1,926 games

Overrated

Edgar 47.0%Winrate 38,421 games

Colt 43.1%Winrate 33,172 games

8-Bit 47.3%Winrate 24,420 games

Brock 41.8%Winrate 22,276 games

If you queue as three

three-brawler line-ups that actually exist — counted across the whole mode.

This is for Heist as a whole, not for this map. There are not enough numbers here yet for a map-specific calculation — the calibration needs line-ups actually played on this map. As soon as enough accumulate, the calculation for Quintillion appears in this spot; until then the mode-wide list is the best available answer.

Out of 92 line-ups with 120+ games.

Bull

Emz

Nori

78.9% 257 games

Bull

Nita

Nori

77.6% 122 games

Griff

Mico

Nori

76.6% 125 games

Emz

Jessie

Nori

76.6% 159 games

Emz

Mico

Nori

76.5% 188 games

Edgar

Emz

Melodie

75.2% 146 games

How these numbers are arrived at

What you see here. three-brawler line-ups that actually exist, counted across the whole mode — not for this map. There is no basis for a map-specific calculation yet: the calibration needs line-ups played on this map. The measured number is therefore not a prediction for Quintillion, but the answer to what generally wins in Heist.

Measured · in the mode. The strongest three-brawler line-ups in this mode, out of 92 with at least 120 games. The number is deliberately cautious: unchecked, the luckiest outlier would sit on top. Per mode, not per map — on a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a number of its own.

All brawlers on this map

Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.

#		Brawler	Win rate	Games	Trust	Pick rate	Rating
1	–	Nori	67.2%	50096	100	5.3%	Strong pick
2	–	Wendy	66.0%	2451	72	0.3%	Strong pick
3	–	Mico	62.4%	35205	100	3.7%	Strong pick
4	▲ 1	Hank	62.8%	9143	92	1.0%	Strong pick
5	▼ 1	Gigi	63.1%	4405	81	0.5%	Strong pick
6	–	Kaze	60.9%	15326	99	1.6%	Strong pick
7	–	Sirius	60.6%	9803	93	1.0%	Strong pick
8	–	Melodie	59.3%	34769	100	3.7%	Strong pick
9	–	Shade	60.3%	5288	83	0.6%	Strong pick
10	–	Lumi	60.4%	4179	80	0.4%	Strong pick
11	–	Starr Nova	59.6%	6916	87	0.7%	Strong pick
12	–	Bolt	59.0%	4831	82	0.5%	Strong pick
13	–	Juju	60.1%	1611	66	0.2%	Strong pick
14	–	R-T	59.7%	1926	68	0.2%	Strong pick
15	–	Emz	56.7%	34351	100	3.7%	Strong pick
16	▲ 1	Trunk	58.2%	1721	67	0.2%	Strong pick
17	▼ 1	Pierce	56.7%	4759	82	0.5%	Strong pick
18	–	Bull	55.4%	38759	100	4.1%	Strong pick
19	–	Chuck	55.7%	15502	100	1.6%	Strong pick
20	–	Draco	57.1%	2168	70	0.2%	Good pick
21	–	Amber	55.9%	5890	85	0.6%	Good pick
22	▲ 3	Ruffs	57.0%	1701	66	0.2%	Good pick
23	–	Nita	54.6%	38903	100	4.1%	Good pick
24	–	Moe	56.6%	2039	69	0.2%	Good pick
25	▼ 2	Nani	55.5%	5181	83	0.6%	Good pick
26	▼ 1	Ziggy	56.1%	2031	69	0.2%	Good pick
27	–	Mina	55.7%	1800	67	0.2%	Good pick
28	▲ 3	Darryl	53.7%	13869	98	1.5%	Good pick
29	▼ 1	Griff	53.3%	21549	100	2.3%	Good pick
30	▼ 1	Lola	54.9%	2395	72	0.3%	Good pick
31	▼ 1	Sprout	54.9%	2308	71	0.2%	Good pick
32	▲ 4	Stu	53.7%	2992	75	0.3%	Good pick
33	▼ 1	Berry	52.5%	17174	100	1.8%	Good pick
34	▼ 1	Doug	53.9%	2046	69	0.2%	Good pick
35	▼ 1	Jessie	51.8%	49548	100	5.3%	Good pick
36	▼ 1	Chester	52.8%	3054	75	0.3%	Good pick
37	▲ 3	Damian	53.9%	1089	60	0.1%	Good pick
38	–	Willow	52.7%	2011	69	0.2%	Good pick
39	▼ 2	Najia	53.1%	1345	63	0.1%	Good pick
40	▼ 1	Kit	51.1%	4713	82	0.5%	Good pick
41	–	Bo	50.5%	6377	86	0.7%	Good pick
42	–	Penny	49.7%	25442	100	2.7%	Solid
43	▲ 2	Sam	51.5%	1630	66	0.2%	Solid
44	–	Mandy	49.6%	12633	96	1.3%	Solid
45	▲ 2	Glowy	50.6%	2147	70	0.2%	Solid
46	▼ 3	Janet	51.4%	1034	59	0.1%	Solid
47	▼ 1	Carl	49.1%	9736	93	1.0%	Solid
48	–	Finx	51.3%	868	56	0.1%	Solid
49	–	Gray	50.0%	2358	71	0.3%	Solid
50	–	Bibi	48.6%	17665	100	1.9%	Solid
51	▲ 4	Angelo	49.6%	1375	63	0.1%	Solid
52	▲ 1	Dynamike	47.6%	21147	100	2.2%	Solid
53	▼ 1	Meeple	49.1%	1549	65	0.2%	Solid
54	▼ 3	8-Bit	47.3%	24420	100	2.6%	Solid
55	▼ 1	Edgar	47.0%	38421	100	4.1%	Solid
56	–	Jae-Yong	49.7%	491	48	0.1%	Solid
57	▲ 2	Alli	47.4%	930	57	0.1%	Solid
58	–	Barley	45.4%	13147	97	1.4%	Solid
59	▼ 2	Cordelius	45.5%	5344	84	0.6%	Solid
60	▲ 2	Kenji	44.0%	7379	88	0.8%	Rather not
61	–	Squeak	44.0%	7519	89	0.8%	Rather not
62	▼ 2	Colt	43.1%	33172	100	3.5%	Rather not
63	–	Mortis	43.3%	3909	79	0.4%	Rather not
64	–	Ash	43.0%	3426	77	0.4%	Rather not
65	▲ 1	Tick	42.3%	13408	97	1.4%	Rather not
66	▲ 1	Gus	43.2%	1365	63	0.1%	Rather not
67	▼ 2	Brock	41.8%	22276	100	2.4%	Rather not
68	–	Larry & Lawrie	42.2%	5316	84	0.6%	Rather not
69	–	Crow	41.2%	17923	100	1.9%	Rather not
70	▲ 6	Piper	40.4%	7944	90	0.8%	Rather not
71	▼ 1	Pearl	40.7%	3222	76	0.3%	Rather not
72	▲ 2	Colette	40.0%	16595	100	1.8%	Rather not
73	▼ 1	Meg	40.2%	6154	86	0.7%	Rather not
74	▼ 3	Surge	40.1%	6444	86	0.7%	Rather not
75	–	Eve	40.1%	2454	72	0.3%	Rather not
76	▲ 1	Rico	39.4%	16973	100	1.8%	Rather not
77	▼ 4	Clancy	39.7%	3926	79	0.4%	Rather not
78	▲ 1	Tara	39.3%	3644	78	0.4%	Rather not
79	▼ 1	Buzz	39.1%	4366	81	0.5%	Rather not
80	▲ 1	Max	39.0%	5894	85	0.6%	Rather not
81	▼ 1	Spike	38.5%	8189	90	0.9%	Rather not
82	▲ 1	Lily	37.2%	4552	81	0.5%	Rather not
83	▼ 1	Frank	37.0%	7685	89	0.8%	Rather not
84	–	El Primo	36.7%	8351	90	0.9%	Rather not
85	–	Charlie	36.3%	2497	72	0.3%	Rather not
86	–	Grom	35.5%	3596	78	0.4%	Rather not
87	–	Pam	35.1%	2442	72	0.3%	Rather not
88	–	Ollie	33.6%	675	53	0.1%	Rather not
89	▲ 1	Shelly	34.1%	7384	88	0.8%	Rather not
90	▼ 1	Fang	34.1%	3492	77	0.4%	Rather not
91	▲ 3	Maisie	33.9%	2883	74	0.3%	Rather not
92	▼ 1	Leon	33.7%	4442	81	0.5%	Rather not
93	▼ 1	Lou	33.8%	3110	75	0.3%	Rather not
94	▼ 1	Gale	33.5%	2571	73	0.3%	Rather not
95	▲ 2	Mr. P	32.3%	2732	74	0.3%	Rather not
96	▼ 1	Otis	32.2%	4151	80	0.4%	Rather not
97	▲ 2	Poco	31.9%	4017	79	0.4%	Rather not
98	–	Byron	31.6%	4562	81	0.5%	Rather not
99	▲ 2	Rosa	31.5%	3328	77	0.4%	Rather not
100	▼ 4	Buster	31.0%	1316	63	0.1%	Rather not
101	▼ 1	Belle	30.5%	2441	72	0.3%	Rather not
102	–	Bonnie	29.2%	2719	73	0.3%	Rather not
103	–	Jacky	29.1%	2333	71	0.2%	Rather not
104	–	Bea	26.2%	2738	74	0.3%	Rather not
105	–	Sandy	23.5%	2109	70	0.2%	Rather not
106	–	Gene	21.4%	1525	65	0.2%	Rather not