
Duo Showdown
40,072 battles collected on this map.
OPEN — more choice than on most maps: 56 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
Showdown has no win or loss — the API only reports the placement. The percentage here says how often the battle ended with a trophy gain (place 1–2 of 5 teams; from the next place down it costs trophies). It cannot be compared with a win rate — the brawlers can be compared with each other.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest two-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the two brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 229 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 333 real line-ups. In Showdown this counts a trophy gain, not a win.
What you see here. The best two-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 229 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 333 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Top-2 rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Wendy |
72.6% | 1405 | 64 | 4.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Frank |
66.3% | 403 | 45 | 1.2% | Good pick | ||
| 3 | ▲ 16 | Carl |
67.5% | 265 | 39 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 4 | ▼ 3 | Nori |
62.4% | 2444 | 72 | 7.4% | Good pick | ||
| 5 | ▼ 33 | Surge |
64.4% | 649 | 52 | 2.0% | Good pick | ||
| 6 | ▼ 18 | Max |
64.6% | 441 | 46 | 1.3% | Good pick | ||
| 7 | ▼ 5 | Ash |
68.0% | 178 | 33 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 8 | ▲ 43 | Lumi |
66.5% | 212 | 35 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 9 | ▲ 68 | Bonnie |
71.1% | 97 | 24 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 10 | ▲ 14 | Fang |
62.9% | 491 | 48 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 11 | ▼ 2 | Kaze |
66.0% | 188 | 34 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 12 | ▲ 4 | Griff |
62.2% | 577 | 50 | 1.8% | Solid | ||
| 13 | ▲ 73 | Emz |
61.7% | 772 | 55 | 2.3% | Solid | ||
| 14 | ▼ 46 | Brock |
61.4% | 865 | 56 | 2.6% | Solid | ||
| 15 | ▼ 27 | Gray |
65.6% | 180 | 33 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 16 | ▲ 4 | Charlie |
70.9% | 79 | 21 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 17 | ▲ 53 | Larry & Lawrie |
69.8% | 86 | 22 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 18 | – | Bolt |
63.9% | 249 | 38 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 19 | ▲ 21 | Mico |
63.3% | 297 | 40 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 20 | ▲ 70 | Trunk |
67.5% | 114 | 26 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 21 | ▲ 59 | Jessie |
63.3% | 294 | 40 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 22 | ▲ 10 | Meg |
63.0% | 319 | 41 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 23 | ▼ 9 | 8-Bit |
61.6% | 591 | 51 | 1.8% | Solid | ||
| 24 | ▼ 22 | Grom |
75.5% | 49 | 13 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 25 | ▲ 18 | Maisie |
66.4% | 131 | 28 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 26 | ▼ 33 | Ruffs |
66.9% | 118 | 27 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 27 | ▲ 12 | Mr. P |
73.2% | 56 | 15 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 28 | ▲ 6 | Rosa |
64.6% | 164 | 31 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 29 | ▼ 3 | Byron |
62.0% | 326 | 42 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 30 | ▲ 7 | Lou |
63.9% | 158 | 31 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 31 | ▲ 20 | Juju |
69.4% | 62 | 17 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 32 | – | Chester |
61.1% | 401 | 45 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 33 | ▲ 18 | Jacky |
63.5% | 159 | 31 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 34 | ▼ 1 | Gale |
64.1% | 131 | 28 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 35 | ▼ 13 | Belle |
64.7% | 116 | 26 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 36 | ▼ 35 | Moe |
67.1% | 76 | 20 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 37 | ▲ 6 | Kit |
60.1% | 614 | 51 | 1.9% | Rather not | ||
| 38 | ▲ 6 | Ziggy |
65.6% | 93 | 23 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 39 | ▲ 42 | Meeple |
61.4% | 285 | 40 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 40 | ▲ 8 | Glowy |
61.5% | 270 | 39 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 41 | ▲ 4 | Sirius |
61.8% | 225 | 36 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 42 | ▼ 4 | Willow |
66.2% | 77 | 20 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 43 | ▲ 35 | Mina |
60.7% | 336 | 42 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 44 | ▲ 5 | Nani |
62.3% | 175 | 32 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 45 | ▲ 10 | Leon |
59.7% | 546 | 49 | 1.7% | Rather not | ||
| 46 | ▲ 29 | Kenji |
60.1% | 421 | 46 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 47 | ▼ 37 | Starr Nova |
59.2% | 777 | 55 | 2.4% | Rather not | ||
| 48 | ▲ 7 | Shade |
59.8% | 433 | 46 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 49 | ▼ 1 | Doug |
60.2% | 332 | 42 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 50 | ▼ 5 | Sam |
66.1% | 62 | 17 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 51 | ▼ 31 | Lola |
63.1% | 111 | 26 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 52 | ▲ 31 | Tick |
61.3% | 191 | 34 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | ▲ 33 | Poco |
59.9% | 354 | 43 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | ▲ 27 | Pearl |
61.0% | 195 | 34 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | ▲ 15 | Buster |
69.2% | 39 | 10 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | ▲ 27 | Otis |
60.4% | 250 | 38 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | ▼ 32 | Piper |
59.9% | 312 | 41 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▼ 51 | Clancy |
64.4% | 73 | 19 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | ▼ 6 | Gigi |
62.0% | 129 | 28 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | ▲ 13 | Shelly |
59.0% | 502 | 48 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | ▼ 11 | Nita |
59.4% | 374 | 44 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▲ 10 | Chuck |
66.7% | 45 | 12 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▼ 4 | Sprout |
61.3% | 137 | 29 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▲ 46 | Bo |
59.5% | 301 | 41 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▼ 49 | Berry |
62.0% | 100 | 24 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▼ 12 | Cordelius |
58.8% | 437 | 46 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▼ 21 | Darryl |
60.0% | 205 | 35 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▼ 12 | Gene |
61.2% | 121 | 27 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▼ 25 | Eve |
63.5% | 63 | 17 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▼ 43 | Jae-Yong |
61.7% | 94 | 23 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▲ 7 | Janet |
62.2% | 74 | 20 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▲ 53 | Draco |
60.5% | 124 | 27 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▲ 13 | Sandy |
60.6% | 104 | 25 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▼ 24 | Crow |
58.2% | 414 | 45 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▲ 5 | Tara |
58.8% | 226 | 36 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▲ 32 | Damian |
60.7% | 84 | 21 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▼ 6 | Lily |
58.2% | 325 | 42 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▼ 23 | Pam |
59.4% | 128 | 28 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▲ 1 | Barley |
59.8% | 102 | 24 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▼ 18 | Penny |
58.3% | 266 | 39 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▼ 35 | Angelo |
59.2% | 130 | 28 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▼ 23 | Finx |
59.3% | 118 | 27 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▼ 43 | Najia |
59.1% | 115 | 26 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▼ 17 | Rico |
57.2% | 621 | 51 | 1.9% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▼ 7 | Colt |
56.7% | 833 | 56 | 2.5% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▼ 6 | Bibi |
56.4% | 404 | 45 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▼ 37 | Bull |
56.4% | 365 | 43 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▼ 1 | Dynamike |
56.4% | 358 | 43 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▲ 4 | Gus |
56.7% | 210 | 35 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▲ 17 | Colette |
56.2% | 315 | 41 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▲ 14 | Ollie |
55.9% | 59 | 16 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▼ 29 | Pierce |
55.1% | 272 | 39 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▼ 38 | Mandy |
54.9% | 297 | 40 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▼ 9 | Alli |
54.7% | 203 | 35 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▼ 16 | Stu |
54.6% | 390 | 44 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▼ 5 | Spike |
54.6% | 447 | 46 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▼ 14 | Edgar |
53.7% | 2143 | 70 | 6.5% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▼ 28 | R-T |
52.6% | 76 | 20 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▲ 11 | Squeak |
53.9% | 154 | 31 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▲ 9 | Melodie |
53.2% | 126 | 28 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▲ 19 | Hank |
52.8% | 125 | 27 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▼ 13 | El Primo |
52.8% | 269 | 39 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | ▼ 58 | Amber |
52.0% | 179 | 33 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | – | Mortis |
52.6% | 686 | 53 | 2.1% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | ▲ 33 | Bea |
50.3% | 151 | 30 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | ▼ 44 | Buzz |
44.2% | 199 | 34 | 0.6% | Rather not |