
Duo Showdown
124,355 battles collected on this map.
OPEN — more choice than on most maps: 104 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
Showdown has no win or loss — the API only reports the placement. The percentage here says how often the battle ended with a trophy gain (place 1–2 of 5 teams; from the next place down it costs trophies). It cannot be compared with a win rate — the brawlers can be compared with each other.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest two-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the two brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 206 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 766 real line-ups. In Showdown this counts a trophy gain, not a win.
What you see here. The best two-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 206 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 766 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (5 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Top-2 rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Wendy |
73.4% | 2153 | 70 | 3.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | ▼ 1 | Nori |
68.6% | 4866 | 82 | 8.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | ▼ 1 | Glowy |
75.6% | 320 | 41 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | ▲ 2 | R-T |
76.3% | 228 | 36 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | ▲ 57 | Bolt |
74.6% | 284 | 40 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | ▲ 4 | Belle |
75.6% | 225 | 36 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | ▲ 14 | Pearl |
72.2% | 313 | 41 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | ▼ 9 | Buster |
78.0% | 141 | 29 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | ▲ 13 | Lola |
73.8% | 225 | 36 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | ▲ 26 | Bonnie |
78.9% | 123 | 27 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | ▼ 62 | Mr. P |
72.9% | 218 | 36 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 12 | ▲ 22 | Trunk |
73.7% | 190 | 34 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 13 | ▲ 55 | Ash |
71.7% | 247 | 38 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 14 | ▲ 60 | Larry & Lawrie |
70.8% | 281 | 40 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 15 | ▲ 45 | Jessie |
69.8% | 338 | 42 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 16 | ▲ 52 | Gigi |
71.0% | 255 | 38 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 17 | ▼ 11 | Starr Nova |
66.0% | 942 | 58 | 1.7% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | ▲ 9 | Jae-Yong |
75.0% | 136 | 29 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | ▼ 42 | Finx |
72.6% | 179 | 33 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | ▼ 31 | Mico |
67.1% | 575 | 50 | 1.0% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | ▼ 36 | Janet |
69.6% | 280 | 39 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | ▲ 70 | Penny |
68.7% | 339 | 42 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | ▲ 20 | Doug |
67.4% | 479 | 48 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | ▲ 35 | Berry |
68.4% | 358 | 43 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | ▼ 32 | Bo |
67.4% | 469 | 47 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 26 | ▲ 2 | Meg |
67.2% | 488 | 48 | 0.9% | Good pick | ||
| 27 | ▼ 22 | Max |
67.1% | 493 | 48 | 0.9% | Good pick | ||
| 28 | ▲ 52 | Gale |
69.6% | 263 | 39 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 29 | ▼ 21 | Damian |
69.3% | 277 | 39 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 30 | ▲ 22 | Gray |
67.0% | 464 | 47 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 31 | ▲ 87 | Charlie |
70.9% | 172 | 32 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 32 | ▲ 30 | El Primo |
65.7% | 563 | 50 | 1.0% | Good pick | ||
| 33 | ▼ 9 | Pam |
69.9% | 193 | 34 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 34 | ▲ 28 | Meeple |
66.8% | 376 | 44 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 35 | ▼ 14 | Angelo |
70.5% | 166 | 32 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 36 | ▲ 9 | Ollie |
76.2% | 84 | 21 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 37 | ▼ 3 | Griff |
63.6% | 1254 | 62 | 2.2% | Good pick | ||
| 38 | ▼ 33 | Lily |
65.1% | 536 | 49 | 0.9% | Good pick | ||
| 39 | ▲ 24 | Jacky |
71.5% | 130 | 28 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 40 | ▼ 18 | Leon |
64.3% | 770 | 55 | 1.4% | Good pick | ||
| 41 | ▼ 42 | Sandy |
68.0% | 225 | 36 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 42 | ▲ 68 | Gus |
66.6% | 308 | 41 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 43 | ▼ 23 | Gene |
67.3% | 248 | 38 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 44 | ▲ 16 | Amber |
66.0% | 347 | 43 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 45 | ▼ 10 | Chester |
64.1% | 716 | 54 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 46 | ▲ 16 | Grom |
69.7% | 155 | 31 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 47 | ▲ 1 | Nita |
65.0% | 471 | 47 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 48 | ▼ 38 | Brock |
63.0% | 1352 | 63 | 2.4% | Solid | ||
| 49 | ▲ 4 | Carl |
64.6% | 522 | 49 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 50 | ▼ 6 | Shade |
63.8% | 735 | 54 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 51 | ▲ 31 | Frank |
64.2% | 611 | 51 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 52 | ▼ 9 | Sprout |
64.9% | 402 | 45 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 53 | ▼ 49 | Kit |
62.5% | 1548 | 65 | 2.7% | Solid | ||
| 54 | ▲ 23 | Otis |
65.1% | 367 | 44 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 55 | ▼ 34 | Bibi |
63.4% | 748 | 54 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 56 | ▼ 39 | Alli |
64.1% | 523 | 49 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 57 | ▼ 23 | Sirius |
63.7% | 578 | 50 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 58 | ▲ 18 | Eve |
68.8% | 141 | 29 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 59 | ▼ 22 | Mandy |
63.8% | 495 | 48 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 60 | ▼ 54 | Cordelius |
63.1% | 645 | 52 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 61 | ▼ 1 | Juju |
67.5% | 160 | 31 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 62 | ▲ 32 | Moe |
65.8% | 231 | 37 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 63 | ▼ 6 | Nani |
64.3% | 345 | 43 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 64 | ▼ 8 | Rosa |
65.2% | 253 | 38 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 65 | ▲ 23 | Maisie |
66.1% | 180 | 33 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 66 | ▼ 3 | Bull |
62.5% | 637 | 52 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 67 | ▼ 14 | Lou |
64.1% | 309 | 41 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 68 | ▼ 3 | Pierce |
63.6% | 352 | 43 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 69 | ▲ 54 | Draco |
65.8% | 184 | 33 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 70 | ▲ 43 | 8-Bit |
62.0% | 818 | 56 | 1.4% | Solid | ||
| 71 | ▲ 18 | Hank |
64.6% | 246 | 38 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 72 | ▼ 3 | Willow |
63.5% | 337 | 42 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 73 | ▲ 2 | Colt |
61.1% | 1446 | 64 | 2.5% | Solid | ||
| 74 | ▲ 44 | Lumi |
64.6% | 226 | 36 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 75 | ▼ 27 | Surge |
60.8% | 1670 | 66 | 2.9% | Solid | ||
| 76 | ▼ 7 | Shelly |
61.4% | 997 | 58 | 1.8% | Solid | ||
| 77 | ▼ 25 | Tara |
63.0% | 368 | 44 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 78 | ▼ 29 | Kenji |
61.5% | 755 | 54 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▼ 18 | Mina |
62.1% | 478 | 47 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▼ 23 | Kaze |
61.9% | 530 | 49 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▲ 11 | Edgar |
59.8% | 3291 | 76 | 5.8% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▼ 10 | Darryl |
62.7% | 306 | 41 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▲ 10 | Rico |
60.4% | 1205 | 61 | 2.1% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▼ 19 | Emz |
60.4% | 1169 | 61 | 2.1% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▲ 59 | Sam |
67.0% | 91 | 23 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▼ 35 | Clancy |
65.8% | 111 | 26 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▼ 23 | Squeak |
62.7% | 244 | 37 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▲ 22 | Poco |
61.5% | 413 | 45 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▼ 40 | Ziggy |
62.4% | 237 | 37 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▼ 10 | Byron |
60.9% | 496 | 48 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▲ 30 | Melodie |
63.2% | 163 | 31 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▼ 55 | Barley |
61.6% | 302 | 41 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▼ 12 | Buzz |
60.3% | 411 | 45 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▼ 51 | Colette |
60.0% | 443 | 46 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▼ 27 | Dynamike |
58.6% | 1099 | 60 | 1.9% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▼ 29 | Ruffs |
60.1% | 288 | 40 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▼ 65 | Najia |
60.8% | 148 | 30 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▼ 2 | Bea |
59.5% | 326 | 42 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▼ 25 | Crow |
58.5% | 786 | 55 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▲ 5 | Stu |
58.4% | 603 | 51 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▼ 14 | Tick |
58.9% | 321 | 42 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▼ 6 | Fang |
58.5% | 472 | 47 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | – | Piper |
58.8% | 296 | 40 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | ▼ 9 | Spike |
57.2% | 617 | 51 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | ▲ 27 | Chuck |
55.6% | 54 | 15 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | ▼ 2 | Mortis |
55.9% | 911 | 57 | 1.6% | Rather not |