
Gem Grab
106,717 battles collected on this map — ranked only.
OPEN — more choice than on most maps: 42 of 104 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 6,323 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 668 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 6,323 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 668 real line-ups from a different rank tier, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (991 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here. The numbers also come from the solo queue: the battles behind them were fought by three strangers, not a practised team.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Bolt |
69.0% | 16651 | 100 | 3.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Clancy |
62.6% | 1250 | 62 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Bo |
56.9% | 18018 | 100 | 3.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | Fang |
56.4% | 12625 | 96 | 2.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | – | Stu |
55.8% | 9023 | 91 | 1.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | – | 8-Bit |
54.8% | 12865 | 97 | 2.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | – | Griff |
54.4% | 18924 | 100 | 3.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | – | Mina |
55.5% | 2919 | 75 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | – | Starr Nova |
54.5% | 8982 | 91 | 1.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | – | Charlie |
54.8% | 2115 | 70 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 11 | – | Pearl |
54.5% | 2343 | 71 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 12 | ▲ 1 | Doug |
54.8% | 1210 | 61 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 13 | – | Max |
52.7% | 7980 | 90 | 1.5% | Good pick | ||
| 14 | – | Crow |
52.0% | 15668 | 100 | 2.9% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | ▼ 1 | Otis |
52.7% | 4494 | 81 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 16 | – | Surge |
51.9% | 8796 | 91 | 1.6% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | ▲ 1 | Carl |
52.2% | 3423 | 77 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | – | Belle |
52.3% | 2748 | 74 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | – | Jessie |
52.0% | 3505 | 77 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | ▼ 1 | Mortis |
50.9% | 19277 | 100 | 3.6% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | ▲ 5 | Janet |
53.8% | 840 | 56 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | – | Edgar |
50.5% | 48537 | 100 | 9.0% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | ▲ 2 | Kit |
51.8% | 2968 | 75 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | ▼ 1 | Ruffs |
53.1% | 898 | 57 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 25 | ▼ 1 | Finx |
53.6% | 707 | 53 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 26 | ▼ 2 | Damian |
52.7% | 1105 | 60 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 27 | ▼ 1 | Pierce |
50.6% | 9907 | 93 | 1.8% | Solid | ||
| 28 | ▼ 2 | Gray |
51.3% | 2337 | 71 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 29 | ▲ 4 | Penny |
50.8% | 3179 | 76 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 30 | ▼ 2 | Piper |
49.7% | 15051 | 99 | 2.8% | Solid | ||
| 31 | ▲ 3 | Meg |
50.7% | 2768 | 74 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 32 | ▲ 2 | Gale |
51.1% | 1539 | 65 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 33 | ▼ 6 | R-T |
53.3% | 492 | 48 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 34 | ▲ 2 | Chester |
50.2% | 3616 | 78 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 35 | ▲ 1 | Gus |
50.1% | 3106 | 75 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 36 | ▼ 5 | Moe |
52.8% | 489 | 48 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 37 | – | Spike |
49.3% | 7640 | 89 | 1.4% | Solid | ||
| 38 | ▲ 1 | Byron |
49.1% | 11302 | 95 | 2.1% | Solid | ||
| 39 | ▼ 2 | Glowy |
51.4% | 868 | 56 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 40 | ▲ 3 | Buster |
57.9% | 140 | 29 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 41 | ▲ 1 | Bibi |
49.5% | 3833 | 79 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 42 | – | Colt |
48.8% | 13361 | 97 | 2.5% | Solid | ||
| 43 | ▼ 1 | Emz |
48.6% | 19733 | 100 | 3.7% | Solid | ||
| 44 | – | Bea |
49.5% | 3500 | 77 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 45 | ▲ 3 | Tick |
48.8% | 7487 | 89 | 1.4% | Solid | ||
| 46 | – | Brock |
48.3% | 21209 | 100 | 3.9% | Solid | ||
| 47 | – | Nori |
47.9% | 41459 | 100 | 7.7% | Solid | ||
| 48 | ▼ 5 | Lola |
51.9% | 422 | 46 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 49 | ▲ 1 | Chuck |
50.0% | 1063 | 59 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 50 | ▲ 1 | Rico |
47.8% | 10805 | 94 | 2.0% | Solid | ||
| 51 | ▲ 1 | Poco |
49.0% | 1810 | 67 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 52 | ▼ 1 | Mr. P |
49.9% | 802 | 55 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 53 | ▼ 1 | Tara |
48.7% | 2188 | 70 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 54 | ▼ 1 | Leon |
47.7% | 7148 | 88 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 55 | ▲ 5 | Mico |
49.2% | 1032 | 59 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 56 | ▼ 1 | Lily |
47.9% | 3296 | 76 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 57 | ▼ 1 | Kenji |
47.8% | 3426 | 77 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 58 | ▲ 6 | Gigi |
49.5% | 572 | 50 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | – | Sirius |
47.9% | 1875 | 68 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | ▲ 2 | Nani |
47.4% | 2644 | 73 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | ▲ 4 | Ash |
48.3% | 939 | 58 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▲ 2 | Darryl |
47.8% | 1608 | 66 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | – | Najia |
47.3% | 2750 | 74 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▼ 5 | Sam |
50.9% | 226 | 36 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▲ 1 | Colette |
46.6% | 6526 | 87 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▲ 4 | Lumi |
47.4% | 1601 | 66 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▼ 1 | Mandy |
46.7% | 3820 | 79 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▼ 1 | Maisie |
48.1% | 822 | 56 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | – | Ollie |
54.0% | 87 | 22 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▲ 6 | Angelo |
48.1% | 742 | 54 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▼ 6 | Hank |
50.5% | 198 | 34 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▼ 2 | Trunk |
46.1% | 8708 | 91 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▲ 1 | Buzz |
47.1% | 1600 | 66 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | – | Bull |
46.6% | 2306 | 71 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▼ 3 | Eve |
47.3% | 569 | 50 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▼ 13 | Juju |
50.5% | 97 | 24 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▲ 3 | Lou |
46.2% | 1399 | 64 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▼ 1 | Pam |
46.6% | 667 | 52 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▲ 1 | Sandy |
46.3% | 920 | 57 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▲ 3 | Jae-Yong |
47.5% | 236 | 37 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▼ 2 | Amber |
46.0% | 869 | 56 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▼ 1 | Cordelius |
45.4% | 1507 | 65 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▲ 4 | Draco |
46.9% | 226 | 36 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▼ 1 | Nita |
44.9% | 2070 | 69 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▲ 2 | Melodie |
45.2% | 825 | 56 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▼ 2 | Gene |
44.7% | 1319 | 63 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▼ 2 | Meeple |
44.1% | 2528 | 72 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▼ 1 | Kaze |
42.3% | 24132 | 100 | 4.5% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | – | Alli |
42.3% | 324 | 42 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | – | El Primo |
42.1% | 1316 | 63 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▲ 1 | Squeak |
40.4% | 3694 | 78 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▲ 1 | Shade |
40.3% | 1073 | 60 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▲ 1 | Frank |
39.8% | 2965 | 75 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▼ 3 | Sprout |
39.7% | 486 | 48 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | – | Rosa |
39.7% | 589 | 51 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | – | Bonnie |
39.4% | 668 | 52 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | – | Willow |
38.8% | 10392 | 94 | 1.9% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | – | Dynamike |
38.0% | 2707 | 73 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | – | Jacky |
37.1% | 415 | 45 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | – | Shelly |
37.7% | 2540 | 72 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | – | Ziggy |
34.4% | 244 | 37 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | – | Grom |
35.6% | 911 | 57 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | – | Berry |
32.5% | 533 | 49 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | – | Larry & Lawrie |
30.4% | 550 | 50 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Barley |
30.4% | 592 | 51 | 0.1% | Rather not |