
Gem Grab
117,566 battles collected on this map — ranked only.
OPEN — more choice than on most maps: 44 of 98 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 7,092 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 3,497 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 7,092 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 3,497 real line-ups from a different rank tier, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (126 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here. The numbers also come from the solo queue: the battles behind them were fought by three strangers, not a practised team.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Bolt |
63.1% | 9219 | 92 | 1.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Stu |
55.4% | 30171 | 100 | 5.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Pearl |
55.7% | 10682 | 94 | 1.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | Starr Nova |
54.6% | 17902 | 100 | 3.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | – | Ash |
57.9% | 853 | 56 | 0.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | – | Mortis |
54.3% | 15574 | 100 | 2.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | – | 8-Bit |
54.1% | 24500 | 100 | 4.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | – | Bo |
53.9% | 17202 | 100 | 2.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | – | Max |
53.5% | 36537 | 100 | 6.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | – | Surge |
53.2% | 23553 | 100 | 3.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | – | Mina |
53.4% | 10402 | 94 | 1.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 12 | – | Charlie |
53.7% | 5643 | 84 | 0.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 13 | – | Damian |
53.0% | 5511 | 84 | 0.9% | Good pick | ||
| 14 | – | Nori |
52.4% | 10179 | 93 | 1.7% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | – | Meg |
52.1% | 17382 | 100 | 2.9% | Good pick | ||
| 16 | – | Eve |
56.6% | 528 | 49 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | – | Kenji |
53.5% | 1420 | 64 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | ▲ 1 | Rico |
51.3% | 15011 | 99 | 2.5% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | ▼ 1 | Glowy |
53.3% | 1216 | 61 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | ▲ 1 | Edgar |
51.2% | 8091 | 90 | 1.4% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | ▼ 1 | Carl |
51.1% | 8920 | 91 | 1.5% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | – | Lola |
52.8% | 1298 | 62 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | ▲ 1 | Leon |
50.5% | 12533 | 96 | 2.1% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | ▼ 1 | Spike |
50.8% | 6534 | 87 | 1.1% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | ▲ 2 | Bonnie |
52.8% | 1053 | 59 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 26 | – | Fang |
50.4% | 12517 | 96 | 2.1% | Good pick | ||
| 27 | ▼ 2 | Melodie |
52.9% | 947 | 58 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 28 | ▲ 2 | Mr. P |
53.0% | 841 | 56 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 29 | ▼ 1 | Ruffs |
50.4% | 8616 | 91 | 1.4% | Solid | ||
| 30 | ▼ 1 | Griff |
50.0% | 16746 | 100 | 2.8% | Solid | ||
| 31 | ▲ 1 | Brock |
49.7% | 33913 | 100 | 5.7% | Solid | ||
| 32 | ▼ 1 | Crow |
49.8% | 27313 | 100 | 4.6% | Solid | ||
| 33 | – | Piper |
49.6% | 27007 | 100 | 4.5% | Solid | ||
| 34 | – | Poco |
52.6% | 682 | 53 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 35 | ▲ 1 | Tara |
50.3% | 2509 | 72 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 36 | ▼ 1 | Bea |
49.5% | 5653 | 84 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 37 | – | Gus |
49.1% | 5706 | 85 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 38 | – | Bibi |
50.4% | 1223 | 62 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 39 | – | Penny |
48.9% | 4720 | 82 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 40 | – | Moe |
50.3% | 1051 | 59 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 41 | – | Clancy |
50.1% | 1111 | 60 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 42 | – | Emz |
49.4% | 1613 | 66 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 43 | ▲ 1 | Lily |
49.0% | 1449 | 64 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 44 | ▲ 2 | Kaze |
49.3% | 1042 | 59 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 45 | – | Pierce |
47.0% | 35307 | 100 | 5.9% | Solid | ||
| 46 | ▲ 1 | Chester |
48.0% | 3459 | 77 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 47 | ▲ 6 | Pam |
50.6% | 393 | 45 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 48 | ▼ 5 | Hank |
62.3% | 53 | 15 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 49 | ▼ 1 | Darryl |
49.7% | 573 | 50 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 50 | – | Byron |
46.7% | 26074 | 100 | 4.4% | Solid | ||
| 51 | ▲ 1 | Otis |
46.9% | 11337 | 95 | 1.9% | Solid | ||
| 52 | ▼ 1 | Jessie |
49.0% | 782 | 55 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | ▼ 4 | Sirius |
49.8% | 476 | 47 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | ▲ 1 | Gray |
47.6% | 2421 | 72 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | ▼ 1 | Finx |
48.3% | 1119 | 60 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | ▲ 4 | Nita |
52.4% | 168 | 32 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | ▲ 5 | Sandy |
50.0% | 362 | 43 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▼ 1 | Angelo |
48.3% | 956 | 58 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | ▼ 3 | Buster |
51.2% | 205 | 35 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | ▼ 1 | Meeple |
46.3% | 9911 | 93 | 1.7% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | ▲ 2 | Kit |
47.2% | 2083 | 70 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▼ 1 | Belle |
46.5% | 5054 | 83 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▲ 1 | Rosa |
50.2% | 251 | 38 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▼ 6 | Sprout |
50.2% | 225 | 36 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▲ 3 | Sam |
51.9% | 135 | 29 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▲ 1 | Bull |
47.9% | 698 | 53 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▼ 2 | Shelly |
49.2% | 301 | 41 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▲ 1 | Alli |
49.8% | 219 | 36 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▲ 2 | Gale |
46.8% | 1409 | 64 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▼ 4 | Draco |
50.6% | 154 | 31 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▲ 1 | Ollie |
49.8% | 201 | 35 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▼ 2 | Najia |
45.8% | 3933 | 79 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | – | Trunk |
50.0% | 124 | 27 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▲ 1 | Colt |
44.7% | 8833 | 91 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▼ 1 | Lou |
45.2% | 2866 | 74 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | – | R-T |
46.3% | 546 | 49 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▲ 1 | Gene |
44.5% | 4409 | 81 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▼ 1 | Mico |
46.4% | 416 | 45 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | – | Maisie |
45.9% | 475 | 47 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | – | Squeak |
45.0% | 1173 | 61 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | – | Janet |
44.7% | 1639 | 66 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | – | Lumi |
44.3% | 2960 | 75 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | – | Buzz |
45.1% | 821 | 56 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | – | Nani |
43.3% | 5375 | 84 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | – | Amber |
44.3% | 885 | 57 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | – | Larry & Lawrie |
43.9% | 41 | 11 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | – | Gigi |
42.8% | 1967 | 69 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▲ 1 | Shade |
43.3% | 157 | 31 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▲ 3 | Frank |
43.3% | 171 | 32 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▲ 1 | Colette |
42.2% | 3702 | 78 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▼ 3 | Juju |
39.5% | 43 | 11 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▼ 2 | Cordelius |
42.8% | 537 | 49 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▲ 3 | Doug |
41.6% | 149 | 30 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▼ 1 | Willow |
36.6% | 41 | 11 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | – | Grom |
40.8% | 157 | 31 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▼ 2 | Barley |
37.9% | 66 | 18 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | – | Jacky |
31.8% | 44 | 12 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | – | Jae-Yong |
40.2% | 722 | 54 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | – | Chuck |
39.4% | 383 | 44 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | – | Dynamike |
38.5% | 260 | 38 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▲ 1 | Ziggy |
28.8% | 73 | 19 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▼ 1 | El Primo |
36.1% | 238 | 37 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | – | Mandy |
37.7% | 1755 | 67 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | ▲ 1 | Tick |
37.0% | 974 | 58 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | ▼ 1 | Berry |
35.6% | 337 | 42 | 0.1% | Rather not |