
Heist
180,125 battles collected on this map — ranked only.
TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 17 of 103 brawlers above 50%.
Long rounds Median 99 s out of 80–99 s in this mode. An early lead is rarely enough; the round is long enough to claw it back.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 7,632 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 860 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 7,632 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 860 real line-ups from a different rank tier, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (366 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here. The numbers also come from the solo queue: the battles behind them were fought by three strangers, not a practised team.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Chuck |
65.2% | 34148 | 100 | 3.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Mico |
61.1% | 22622 | 100 | 2.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Jessie |
59.7% | 38421 | 100 | 4.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | Penny |
57.5% | 29688 | 100 | 3.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | – | Bolt |
58.5% | 4640 | 81 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | – | Carl |
56.8% | 9488 | 92 | 1.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | – | Nori |
55.9% | 92545 | 100 | 10.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | – | Bull |
55.4% | 9646 | 92 | 1.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | – | Melodie |
54.9% | 5746 | 85 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | – | Edgar |
53.3% | 90136 | 100 | 9.7% | Good pick | ||
| 11 | – | Nita |
52.8% | 18152 | 100 | 2.0% | Good pick | ||
| 12 | – | Eve |
54.2% | 2254 | 71 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 13 | – | Sam |
58.4% | 305 | 41 | 0.0% | Good pick | ||
| 14 | – | 8-Bit |
51.4% | 39745 | 100 | 4.3% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | – | Griff |
50.1% | 27121 | 100 | 2.9% | Good pick | ||
| 16 | – | Bo |
50.0% | 18059 | 100 | 1.9% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | – | Starr Nova |
50.0% | 8158 | 90 | 0.9% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | – | Bibi |
50.1% | 4918 | 82 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | – | Colt |
48.9% | 60567 | 100 | 6.5% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | – | Darryl |
50.1% | 3504 | 77 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | – | Colette |
49.0% | 22585 | 100 | 2.4% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | – | Pierce |
49.2% | 9766 | 93 | 1.1% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | – | Mandy |
48.8% | 17874 | 100 | 1.9% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | – | Belle |
49.1% | 3400 | 77 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 25 | – | Lily |
49.1% | 3798 | 78 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 26 | – | Cordelius |
49.3% | 2544 | 72 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 27 | – | Brock |
47.6% | 56039 | 100 | 6.0% | Solid | ||
| 28 | – | Otis |
48.6% | 4307 | 80 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 29 | – | Doug |
49.6% | 1211 | 61 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 30 | – | Gigi |
49.9% | 915 | 57 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 31 | ▼ 1 | R-T |
49.4% | 890 | 57 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 32 | ▲ 1 | Clancy |
49.0% | 1214 | 61 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 33 | – | Shade |
47.5% | 4406 | 81 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 34 | – | Juju |
50.0% | 474 | 47 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 35 | – | Trunk |
46.3% | 13854 | 98 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 36 | – | Kaze |
45.7% | 46006 | 100 | 5.0% | Solid | ||
| 37 | – | Fang |
46.1% | 5268 | 83 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 38 | – | Emz |
45.5% | 21741 | 100 | 2.3% | Solid | ||
| 39 | – | Rico |
45.2% | 25434 | 100 | 2.7% | Solid | ||
| 40 | – | Lumi |
46.1% | 2347 | 71 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 41 | – | Ruffs |
47.1% | 497 | 48 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 42 | – | Crow |
44.1% | 21257 | 100 | 2.3% | Solid | ||
| 43 | – | Grom |
45.4% | 1722 | 67 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 44 | – | Buzz |
44.7% | 2680 | 73 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 45 | ▼ 1 | Berry |
44.6% | 2797 | 74 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 46 | – | Nani |
44.5% | 3313 | 76 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 47 | – | Gale |
45.0% | 1324 | 63 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 48 | ▼ 1 | Alli |
45.8% | 518 | 49 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 49 | – | Lola |
44.9% | 897 | 57 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 50 | ▲ 2 | Mina |
44.9% | 692 | 53 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 51 | ▼ 1 | Amber |
43.4% | 3289 | 76 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 52 | ▲ 1 | Angelo |
43.5% | 2885 | 74 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 53 | – | Moe |
44.3% | 393 | 45 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 54 | – | Buster |
44.2% | 95 | 23 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 55 | – | Sirius |
43.0% | 3704 | 78 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 56 | – | El Primo |
42.4% | 3119 | 76 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | ▲ 1 | Finx |
42.9% | 445 | 46 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▼ 1 | Chester |
42.2% | 2709 | 73 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | – | Najia |
42.2% | 2213 | 70 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | – | Kit |
41.9% | 1310 | 63 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | – | Spike |
40.8% | 9632 | 92 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | – | Gray |
41.4% | 848 | 56 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | – | Kenji |
40.9% | 2746 | 74 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | – | Draco |
41.0% | 520 | 49 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | – | Damian |
41.0% | 581 | 50 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▼ 1 | Janet |
40.8% | 368 | 44 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | – | Piper |
40.2% | 8079 | 90 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | – | Stu |
40.5% | 1781 | 67 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | – | Glowy |
40.3% | 708 | 53 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | – | Jae-Yong |
37.0% | 127 | 28 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | – | Surge |
39.6% | 5371 | 84 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | – | Pearl |
40.0% | 1694 | 66 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | – | Sprout |
40.0% | 1084 | 60 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | – | Byron |
39.5% | 4918 | 82 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▲ 1 | Meg |
39.3% | 2953 | 75 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | – | Mortis |
39.1% | 3911 | 79 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | – | Ollie |
27.3% | 55 | 15 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | – | Maisie |
38.6% | 725 | 54 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | – | Ziggy |
38.0% | 397 | 45 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▼ 1 | Bea |
38.6% | 1959 | 69 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▲ 1 | Tick |
38.2% | 5617 | 84 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | – | Max |
38.1% | 3498 | 77 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | – | Squeak |
37.8% | 6070 | 86 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | – | Charlie |
37.7% | 983 | 58 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | – | Mr. P |
37.2% | 818 | 56 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | – | Frank |
36.9% | 5208 | 83 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | – | Gus |
36.1% | 878 | 57 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | – | Hank |
33.5% | 266 | 39 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | – | Willow |
35.7% | 14750 | 99 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▲ 1 | Poco |
35.7% | 982 | 58 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | – | Lou |
35.7% | 1220 | 61 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | – | Ash |
35.1% | 781 | 55 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▼ 1 | Dynamike |
35.3% | 5226 | 83 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | – | Barley |
35.2% | 1465 | 64 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | – | Bonnie |
34.6% | 811 | 55 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | – | Tara |
35.0% | 1542 | 65 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | – | Meeple |
32.5% | 630 | 52 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | – | Leon |
32.4% | 3090 | 75 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | – | Larry & Lawrie |
31.6% | 1104 | 60 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | – | Sandy |
28.3% | 495 | 48 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | – | Pam |
28.3% | 598 | 51 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | – | Jacky |
27.8% | 608 | 51 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | – | Shelly |
29.3% | 3421 | 77 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | – | Rosa |
26.3% | 589 | 51 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Gene |
12.5% | 481 | 48 | 0.1% | Rather not |