Bounty

Shooting Star

201,622 battles collected on this map.

TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 34 of 106 brawlers above 50%.

Recommendation

Artillery 38295 games

Marksman 106702 games

Controller 12658 games

Artillery 17052 games

Damage Dealer 17698 games

Damage Dealer 4090 games

Damage Dealer 2853 games

Controller 4880 games

Controller 6643 games

What the rating, star, trust and the tags mean

Strong pickHow the brawler stands on this map compared to the whole mode (Bounty): Strong pick is the top tenth of all map/brawler rows, Good pick the top quarter, Solid the upper half, Rather not the rest. What is measured is the cautiously computed win rate (Wilson lower bound), the same number the cards are sorted by — not the percentage shown beside it. The thresholds come from the field rather than from fixed percentages: the modes sit at different levels, and in Showdown the number counts trophy gains rather than wins. Not to be confused with the tier list — that ranks a brawler by how many maps of the rotation he is usable on, across all maps together. A Rather not among the recommended eight therefore does not mean “played badly”, but: this map has nothing better to offer.

TrustHow dependable the win rate next to it is, 0–100. Depends purely on the number of games — not on how good the brawler is.

Carry — becomes star player unusually often on this map: he deals the damage and takes the objective. The game runs through him.

Enabler — rarely becomes star player: he clears the way, heals, controls, and others do the scoring. This is no verdict on his strength — how good he is here is the win rate on the card. Measured across 1,620 map/brawler rows, enablers win on average 3.8 points less often than carries, but the star rate explains only 11% of the differences: there are plenty of strong enablers and weak carries. The star says how a brawler wins, not whether.

Hidden gems & traps

From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.

Underrated

Jae-Yong 54.7%Winrate 1,921 games

Juju 54.0%Winrate 2,540 games

Eve 52.2%Winrate 4,090 games

Ziggy 52.5%Winrate 2,255 games

Overrated

Edgar 45.7%Winrate 64,079 games

Colt 46.2%Winrate 36,498 games

Crow 44.7%Winrate 19,989 games

Dynamike 43.1%Winrate 18,047 games

If you queue as three

The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.

Searched freely across 8,423 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 480 real line-ups.

72.9% expected

72.9% expected

72.9% expected

72.9% expected

72.9% expected

72.8% expected

How these numbers are arrived at

What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.

Best · on this map. All 8,423 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 480 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.

What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (100 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.

All brawlers on this map

Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.

#		Brawler	Win rate	Games	Trust	Pick rate	Rating
1	–	Bolt	66.8%	25764	100	2.1%	Strong pick
2	–	Wendy	59.3%	94275	100	7.8%	Strong pick
3	–	Najia	57.3%	14941	99	1.2%	Strong pick
4	–	Nani	56.8%	23276	100	1.9%	Strong pick
5	–	Pierce	56.7%	27842	100	2.3%	Strong pick
6	–	Mina	57.4%	5381	84	0.4%	Strong pick
7	–	Brock	54.9%	81667	100	6.7%	Strong pick
8	–	Angelo	55.2%	12059	96	1.0%	Strong pick
9	–	Belle	55.1%	16936	100	1.4%	Strong pick
10	–	Tick	54.6%	38295	100	3.2%	Good pick
11	–	Sprout	55.1%	5699	85	0.5%	Good pick
12	–	Gray	54.5%	10033	93	0.8%	Good pick
13	–	Piper	53.5%	106702	100	8.8%	Good pick
14	–	Bo	53.4%	12658	96	1.0%	Good pick
15	–	Byron	52.8%	43270	100	3.6%	Good pick
16	▲ 2	Grom	53.1%	17052	100	1.4%	Good pick
17	–	Mandy	52.8%	35946	100	3.0%	Good pick
18	▼ 2	Jae-Yong	54.7%	1921	68	0.2%	Good pick
19	–	Max	52.9%	11565	95	1.0%	Good pick
20	–	Juju	54.0%	2540	72	0.2%	Good pick
21	–	Meeple	52.8%	6395	86	0.5%	Good pick
22	–	8-Bit	51.9%	17698	100	1.5%	Good pick
23	–	Gus	51.9%	12183	96	1.0%	Good pick
24	–	Eve	52.2%	4090	80	0.3%	Solid
25	–	Mortis	51.2%	18249	100	1.5%	Solid
26	–	Ziggy	52.5%	2255	71	0.2%	Solid
27	–	Bonnie	51.4%	5060	83	0.4%	Solid
28	▲ 1	R-T	51.6%	2853	74	0.2%	Solid
29	▼ 1	Janet	51.6%	2824	74	0.2%	Solid
30	–	Leon	50.2%	17440	100	1.4%	Solid
31	▲ 1	Mico	51.0%	3653	78	0.3%	Solid
32	▲ 1	Gigi	51.4%	2473	72	0.2%	Solid
33	▼ 2	Mr. P	50.7%	4880	82	0.4%	Solid
34	–	Bea	49.6%	20506	100	1.7%	Solid
35	–	Fang	49.6%	14225	98	1.2%	Solid
36	–	Kit	49.8%	8399	90	0.7%	Solid
37	–	Nori	49.2%	25664	100	2.1%	Solid
38	▲ 1	Finx	50.6%	2128	70	0.2%	Solid
39	▼ 1	Gene	49.6%	6643	87	0.5%	Solid
40	–	Starr Nova	49.3%	7169	88	0.6%	Solid
41	–	Carl	49.2%	7245	88	0.6%	Solid
42	▲ 2	Ruffs	49.7%	2481	72	0.2%	Solid
43	▼ 1	Squeak	48.5%	14494	99	1.2%	Solid
44	▼ 1	Glowy	49.5%	2465	72	0.2%	Solid
45	–	Penny	48.1%	9770	93	0.8%	Solid
46	–	Pearl	48.1%	4100	80	0.3%	Solid
47	–	Kaze	47.8%	3700	78	0.3%	Solid
48	–	Colt	46.2%	36498	100	3.0%	Solid
49	–	Spike	46.5%	16256	100	1.3%	Solid
50	–	Stu	46.8%	6628	87	0.5%	Solid
51	–	Edgar	45.7%	64079	100	5.3%	Rather not
52	–	Sirius	46.4%	6356	86	0.5%	Rather not
53	–	Moe	47.1%	1451	64	0.1%	Rather not
54	▲ 2	Maisie	45.9%	4602	81	0.4%	Rather not
55	–	Lola	46.1%	2898	74	0.2%	Rather not
56	▼ 2	Larry & Lawrie	45.9%	3393	77	0.3%	Rather not
57	–	Crow	44.7%	19989	100	1.6%	Rather not
58	–	Lumi	45.2%	2212	70	0.2%	Rather not
59	▲ 1	Chester	44.0%	4275	80	0.4%	Rather not
60	▼ 1	Amber	44.0%	3627	78	0.3%	Rather not
61	▲ 1	Lily	43.7%	5838	85	0.5%	Rather not
62	▼ 1	Otis	43.8%	5679	85	0.5%	Rather not
63	–	Dynamike	43.1%	18047	100	1.5%	Rather not
64	–	Damian	44.2%	1623	66	0.1%	Rather not
65	–	Griff	43.0%	14189	98	1.2%	Rather not
66	–	Rico	42.9%	17817	100	1.5%	Rather not
67	–	Jessie	42.8%	7956	90	0.7%	Rather not
68	▲ 1	Alli	43.2%	1916	68	0.2%	Rather not
69	▼ 1	Willow	43.0%	2624	73	0.2%	Rather not
70	–	Charlie	42.4%	2791	74	0.2%	Rather not
71	–	Surge	41.4%	10023	93	0.8%	Rather not
72	▲ 1	Chuck	41.7%	1528	65	0.1%	Rather not
73	▼ 1	Emz	40.7%	17732	100	1.5%	Rather not
74	–	Melodie	40.9%	2776	74	0.2%	Rather not
75	–	Colette	40.2%	10425	94	0.9%	Rather not
76	▲ 2	Doug	39.2%	1792	67	0.1%	Rather not
77	▼ 1	Ollie	39.2%	819	56	0.1%	Rather not
78	▼ 1	Lou	38.7%	3570	78	0.3%	Rather not
79	▲ 1	Pam	37.9%	2488	72	0.2%	Rather not
80	▼ 1	Shade	37.9%	2820	74	0.2%	Rather not
81	–	Buster	37.8%	1101	60	0.1%	Rather not
82	–	Bibi	37.2%	5818	85	0.5%	Rather not
83	–	Kenji	37.2%	4997	83	0.4%	Rather not
84	▲ 1	Hank	37.3%	1448	64	0.1%	Rather not
85	▼ 1	Gale	37.0%	3643	78	0.3%	Rather not
86	–	Draco	36.5%	862	56	0.1%	Rather not
87	–	Frank	35.8%	5824	85	0.5%	Rather not
88	–	Buzz	35.7%	4103	80	0.3%	Rather not
89	–	Tara	35.6%	3410	77	0.3%	Rather not
90	▲ 2	Meg	35.4%	3403	77	0.3%	Rather not
91	▼ 1	Sam	35.2%	1231	62	0.1%	Rather not
92	▼ 1	Ash	35.2%	1513	65	0.1%	Rather not
93	–	Barley	34.0%	5239	83	0.4%	Rather not
94	–	Sandy	33.8%	2267	71	0.2%	Rather not
95	–	Clancy	33.6%	1712	67	0.1%	Rather not
96	▲ 1	Cordelius	33.5%	2856	74	0.2%	Rather not
97	▼ 1	Poco	33.3%	5888	85	0.5%	Rather not
98	–	Darryl	33.1%	4103	80	0.3%	Rather not
99	–	Trunk	32.2%	1221	62	0.1%	Rather not
100	–	Berry	32.2%	3138	76	0.3%	Rather not
101	–	Nita	30.2%	5112	83	0.4%	Rather not
102	–	Shelly	28.0%	7026	88	0.6%	Rather not
103	–	Jacky	26.7%	2320	71	0.2%	Rather not
104	–	Bull	25.3%	5071	83	0.4%	Rather not
105	–	El Primo	25.0%	4645	81	0.4%	Rather not
106	–	Rosa	24.2%	2953	75	0.2%	Rather not