
Brawl Ball
230,315 battles collected on this map.
TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 43 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 9,557 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 1,672 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 9,557 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 1,672 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (124 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ▲ 1 | Ash |
62.8% | 8952 | 91 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | ▲ 1 | R-T |
61.5% | 2533 | 72 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | ▼ 2 | Doug |
59.5% | 19880 | 100 | 1.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | ▲ 3 | Bolt |
59.1% | 7108 | 88 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 5 | ▼ 1 | Damian |
58.4% | 18249 | 100 | 1.3% | Good pick | ||
| 6 | ▲ 2 | Lumi |
58.1% | 5306 | 83 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 7 | ▲ 6 | Trunk |
58.0% | 5534 | 84 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 8 | ▲ 3 | Starr Nova |
57.2% | 16585 | 100 | 1.2% | Good pick | ||
| 9 | ▼ 4 | Griff |
56.4% | 74930 | 100 | 5.4% | Good pick | ||
| 10 | ▼ 4 | Jacky |
56.9% | 12522 | 96 | 0.9% | Good pick | ||
| 11 | ▲ 4 | Gigi |
57.3% | 3233 | 76 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 12 | ▲ 6 | Nori |
55.2% | 33648 | 100 | 2.4% | Solid | ||
| 13 | ▼ 3 | Bibi |
55.0% | 92073 | 100 | 6.7% | Solid | ||
| 14 | ▼ 5 | Bull |
54.9% | 78060 | 100 | 5.6% | Solid | ||
| 15 | ▲ 7 | Ruffs |
56.8% | 2345 | 71 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 16 | ▲ 1 | Wendy |
54.6% | 96758 | 100 | 7.0% | Solid | ||
| 17 | ▼ 1 | Rosa |
55.4% | 8131 | 90 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 18 | ▲ 8 | Moe |
56.3% | 2861 | 74 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 19 | ▼ 5 | Ollie |
57.2% | 1320 | 63 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 20 | ▲ 1 | Shade |
54.8% | 9636 | 92 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 21 | ▲ 4 | Buster |
55.3% | 2139 | 70 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 22 | ▼ 3 | Chester |
53.7% | 16644 | 100 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 23 | ▲ 4 | Jae-Yong |
57.1% | 857 | 56 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 24 | ▼ 4 | Clancy |
53.9% | 6689 | 87 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 25 | ▲ 8 | Draco |
54.6% | 2783 | 74 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 26 | ▼ 14 | Meg |
52.9% | 29298 | 100 | 2.1% | Solid | ||
| 27 | ▲ 1 | Alli |
53.4% | 3299 | 76 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 28 | ▲ 3 | Mina |
52.9% | 5445 | 84 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 29 | ▼ 6 | Frank |
51.9% | 47798 | 100 | 3.5% | Solid | ||
| 30 | ▼ 6 | Bo |
52.4% | 9818 | 93 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 31 | ▲ 3 | Sirius |
52.1% | 6847 | 87 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 32 | ▲ 9 | Pierce |
52.1% | 2917 | 75 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 33 | ▼ 3 | Surge |
50.7% | 49954 | 100 | 3.6% | Solid | ||
| 34 | ▲ 4 | Willow |
52.1% | 2983 | 75 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 35 | ▼ 3 | Emz |
50.3% | 51796 | 100 | 3.7% | Rather not | ||
| 36 | ▼ 7 | Rico |
50.1% | 56291 | 100 | 4.1% | Rather not | ||
| 37 | ▲ 6 | Kaze |
51.1% | 4768 | 82 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 38 | ▲ 1 | Ziggy |
52.9% | 984 | 58 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 39 | ▲ 6 | Finx |
52.6% | 1115 | 60 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 40 | ▲ 2 | Buzz |
49.8% | 12789 | 97 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 41 | ▲ 10 | Sam |
51.0% | 2162 | 70 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 42 | ▼ 7 | Tara |
49.8% | 11525 | 95 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 43 | ▲ 1 | Otis |
49.8% | 7145 | 88 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 44 | ▲ 2 | Meeple |
50.6% | 2501 | 72 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 45 | ▼ 9 | Cordelius |
49.2% | 10343 | 93 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 46 | ▲ 1 | Hank |
50.2% | 2357 | 71 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 47 | ▼ 7 | Glowy |
50.8% | 1195 | 61 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 48 | ▲ 1 | Gale |
48.8% | 8700 | 91 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 49 | ▲ 1 | Sprout |
49.2% | 2459 | 72 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 50 | ▲ 11 | Stu |
47.9% | 7898 | 89 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 51 | ▲ 11 | Sandy |
48.1% | 4609 | 81 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 52 | ▼ 15 | Nita |
47.2% | 25236 | 100 | 1.8% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | ▲ 6 | Carl |
47.7% | 5693 | 85 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | ▲ 2 | Amber |
47.8% | 2690 | 73 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | ▼ 2 | Kenji |
46.7% | 20485 | 100 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | ▼ 2 | Fang |
46.3% | 14020 | 98 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | ▲ 10 | Maisie |
46.9% | 3877 | 79 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▲ 8 | Lou |
46.8% | 4277 | 80 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | ▲ 9 | Max |
46.4% | 8068 | 90 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | ▼ 12 | Edgar |
45.7% | 105020 | 100 | 7.6% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | ▼ 9 | Tick |
45.9% | 10515 | 94 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▲ 11 | Pearl |
46.4% | 3785 | 78 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | – | Kit |
46.0% | 4790 | 82 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▲ 1 | Juju |
47.7% | 641 | 52 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▼ 10 | Dynamike |
44.8% | 24178 | 100 | 1.7% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▲ 7 | Gray |
45.9% | 1846 | 68 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▼ 8 | El Primo |
44.6% | 26374 | 100 | 1.9% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▼ 11 | Najia |
46.3% | 945 | 58 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▼ 5 | Mortis |
44.1% | 28441 | 100 | 2.1% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▲ 8 | Larry & Lawrie |
44.5% | 1950 | 69 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▲ 6 | Mico |
44.6% | 1313 | 63 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▼ 3 | Darryl |
43.3% | 10386 | 94 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▼ 2 | Spike |
43.0% | 15376 | 99 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▼ 4 | Janet |
44.5% | 791 | 55 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▼ 3 | Chuck |
44.6% | 607 | 51 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | – | Melodie |
43.3% | 2910 | 75 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▼ 17 | Shelly |
42.2% | 42350 | 100 | 3.1% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▼ 3 | Poco |
42.1% | 8896 | 91 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | – | Lily |
41.6% | 3829 | 79 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▲ 4 | Charlie |
41.1% | 2263 | 71 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▲ 6 | Lola |
40.7% | 953 | 58 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▲ 1 | Mandy |
40.2% | 2239 | 71 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▼ 3 | Jessie |
39.4% | 7855 | 89 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▼ 2 | Colette |
39.2% | 9781 | 93 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▼ 4 | Brock |
38.7% | 14161 | 98 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▼ 1 | Colt |
38.0% | 23826 | 100 | 1.7% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▲ 2 | Nani |
38.4% | 1491 | 64 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▼ 2 | Crow |
37.3% | 12713 | 97 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▼ 1 | Eve |
37.1% | 821 | 56 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▲ 2 | Berry |
36.9% | 3917 | 79 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▲ 4 | Gus |
36.9% | 1310 | 63 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▼ 2 | 8-Bit |
36.4% | 8889 | 91 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▲ 1 | Pam |
36.5% | 1463 | 64 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▼ 1 | Squeak |
35.4% | 4750 | 82 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▼ 4 | Leon |
34.4% | 5877 | 85 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▲ 4 | Mr. P |
33.6% | 1005 | 59 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▼ 1 | Barley |
33.7% | 4232 | 80 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▲ 1 | Penny |
33.4% | 4047 | 79 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▲ 2 | Bea |
33.3% | 2557 | 73 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▼ 3 | Angelo |
31.0% | 448 | 47 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▼ 3 | Grom |
32.1% | 2765 | 74 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | – | Bonnie |
29.5% | 954 | 58 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | – | Byron |
28.8% | 2926 | 75 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | ▲ 1 | Gene |
25.2% | 1454 | 64 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | ▼ 1 | Belle |
24.7% | 1337 | 63 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Piper |
22.1% | 2795 | 74 | 0.2% | Rather not |