
Knockout
77,056 battles collected on this map.
OPEN — more choice than on most maps: 55 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 6,576 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 394 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 6,576 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 394 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (186 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Sirius |
62.3% | 5405 | 84 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Sprout |
60.5% | 3631 | 78 | 0.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | ▲ 1 | Grom |
59.2% | 4707 | 82 | 1.0% | Good pick | ||
| 4 | ▼ 1 | Mico |
58.7% | 5567 | 84 | 1.2% | Good pick | ||
| 5 | ▲ 3 | Juju |
58.6% | 2572 | 73 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 6 | ▼ 1 | Larry & Lawrie |
58.1% | 3581 | 78 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 7 | – | Spike |
57.4% | 5598 | 84 | 1.2% | Good pick | ||
| 8 | ▼ 2 | Ziggy |
58.1% | 2212 | 70 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 9 | – | Pierce |
56.7% | 4384 | 81 | 0.9% | Good pick | ||
| 10 | ▲ 2 | Byron |
55.6% | 6987 | 88 | 1.5% | Good pick | ||
| 11 | ▼ 1 | Squeak |
56.2% | 3290 | 76 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 12 | ▲ 4 | Piper |
55.0% | 10025 | 93 | 2.2% | Solid | ||
| 13 | ▼ 2 | Kit |
55.1% | 8146 | 90 | 1.8% | Solid | ||
| 14 | ▼ 1 | Leon |
54.9% | 9349 | 92 | 2.0% | Solid | ||
| 15 | ▼ 1 | Mandy |
54.8% | 9015 | 91 | 1.9% | Solid | ||
| 16 | ▼ 1 | Nani |
55.0% | 5502 | 84 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 17 | – | Jae-Yong |
55.6% | 2124 | 70 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 18 | ▲ 3 | Janet |
55.0% | 2675 | 73 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 19 | ▲ 11 | Tick |
53.8% | 6681 | 87 | 1.4% | Solid | ||
| 20 | ▼ 1 | Gray |
53.8% | 4699 | 82 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 21 | ▼ 1 | Najia |
53.9% | 4462 | 81 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 22 | ▲ 17 | Edgar |
52.9% | 17386 | 100 | 3.8% | Solid | ||
| 23 | ▼ 5 | Meeple |
53.7% | 4078 | 80 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 24 | ▲ 3 | Crow |
53.2% | 7857 | 89 | 1.7% | Solid | ||
| 25 | ▼ 3 | Otis |
53.4% | 3420 | 77 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 26 | ▼ 1 | Belle |
53.0% | 4814 | 82 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 27 | ▼ 4 | Willow |
53.3% | 3167 | 76 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 28 | ▼ 2 | Bea |
52.7% | 5981 | 85 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 29 | ▲ 53 | Wendy |
69.0% | 100 | 24 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 30 | ▼ 2 | Charlie |
53.1% | 2444 | 72 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 31 | ▲ 1 | Eve |
53.0% | 2279 | 71 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 32 | ▼ 8 | Lily |
52.1% | 5445 | 84 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 33 | – | Bonnie |
52.3% | 3680 | 78 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 34 | ▲ 3 | Surge |
52.0% | 4581 | 81 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 35 | ▼ 6 | Pearl |
52.5% | 2650 | 73 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 36 | ▲ 5 | Dynamike |
51.4% | 7875 | 89 | 1.7% | Solid | ||
| 37 | ▼ 2 | Bo |
51.9% | 3782 | 78 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 38 | ▼ 4 | Finx |
52.2% | 2423 | 72 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 39 | ▼ 3 | Glowy |
52.1% | 2351 | 71 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 40 | ▼ 9 | Mr. P |
51.6% | 3320 | 76 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 41 | ▲ 12 | Brock |
50.6% | 13450 | 97 | 2.9% | Rather not | ||
| 42 | ▼ 4 | Mina |
51.6% | 2645 | 73 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 43 | ▼ 3 | Maisie |
51.1% | 3779 | 78 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 44 | ▲ 3 | Berry |
51.3% | 2917 | 75 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 45 | ▲ 5 | Griff |
50.9% | 4373 | 81 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 46 | ▲ 16 | Emz |
50.7% | 4675 | 82 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 47 | ▼ 5 | R-T |
51.1% | 2150 | 70 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 48 | ▲ 4 | Cordelius |
50.4% | 4476 | 81 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 49 | ▼ 5 | Colette |
50.1% | 6831 | 87 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 50 | ▲ 7 | Rico |
49.8% | 9593 | 92 | 2.1% | Rather not | ||
| 51 | ▲ 8 | Hank |
50.8% | 2589 | 73 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 52 | ▼ 8 | Gus |
50.0% | 6509 | 87 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | ▼ 4 | Max |
50.1% | 4879 | 82 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | ▼ 9 | Chester |
50.1% | 4450 | 81 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | – | Kenji |
50.3% | 3383 | 77 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | ▼ 11 | Moe |
50.8% | 1802 | 67 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | ▼ 5 | Fang |
49.9% | 4627 | 81 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▼ 10 | Stu |
49.7% | 6020 | 85 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | ▲ 6 | Angelo |
49.6% | 4988 | 83 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | ▼ 6 | Lola |
49.8% | 2860 | 74 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | ▼ 5 | Nori |
49.6% | 3708 | 78 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▲ 6 | Starr Nova |
49.4% | 3810 | 79 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▲ 1 | Carl |
49.3% | 4538 | 81 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▼ 5 | Ruffs |
49.4% | 2541 | 72 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▼ 2 | Melodie |
49.3% | 2635 | 73 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▼ 5 | Tara |
49.1% | 3130 | 76 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▼ 9 | Shade |
48.9% | 3846 | 79 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▼ 2 | Buzz |
48.8% | 3744 | 78 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▼ 2 | Mortis |
48.3% | 7349 | 88 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▲ 4 | Colt |
47.8% | 14699 | 99 | 3.2% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▼ 1 | Lumi |
49.0% | 2054 | 69 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▲ 1 | Bibi |
48.4% | 4014 | 79 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▼ 4 | Amber |
48.7% | 2570 | 73 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▼ 2 | Buster |
48.8% | 1724 | 67 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▼ 4 | Meg |
48.1% | 2659 | 73 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▲ 1 | Lou |
48.0% | 2127 | 70 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▼ 2 | Penny |
47.5% | 3936 | 79 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | – | Gene |
46.9% | 3891 | 79 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▲ 1 | Ollie |
47.5% | 1506 | 65 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▼ 1 | Clancy |
46.8% | 1753 | 67 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▼ 5 | Draco |
46.8% | 1662 | 66 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▲ 2 | Darryl |
45.9% | 4570 | 81 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▲ 2 | 8-Bit |
45.8% | 5273 | 83 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▼ 1 | Gigi |
46.5% | 1500 | 65 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▼ 4 | Gale |
45.9% | 2723 | 74 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▲ 2 | Frank |
44.9% | 4655 | 82 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | – | Jessie |
44.5% | 3818 | 79 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▼ 2 | Sandy |
44.3% | 2062 | 69 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▲ 1 | Kaze |
44.0% | 3431 | 77 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▲ 2 | Alli |
43.5% | 2170 | 70 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | – | Damian |
43.5% | 1729 | 67 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▼ 3 | Ash |
43.3% | 1971 | 69 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | – | Sam |
43.0% | 2282 | 71 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▲ 2 | Shelly |
40.6% | 9200 | 92 | 2.0% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▼ 1 | Pam |
40.7% | 2565 | 73 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▲ 2 | Barley |
39.9% | 5151 | 83 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▼ 2 | Doug |
39.8% | 2039 | 69 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▼ 1 | Bolt |
39.1% | 2021 | 69 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | – | Bull |
38.1% | 6249 | 86 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▲ 1 | Poco |
37.9% | 5461 | 84 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▼ 1 | Trunk |
37.6% | 1695 | 66 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▲ 1 | Nita |
37.0% | 5589 | 84 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | ▼ 1 | Chuck |
36.5% | 1757 | 67 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | ▲ 1 | El Primo |
31.7% | 5363 | 84 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | ▼ 1 | Jacky |
31.4% | 2425 | 72 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Rosa |
24.5% | 3500 | 77 | 0.8% | Rather not |