
Brawl Ball
154,347 battles collected on this map.
OPEN — more choice than on most maps: 55 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 9,472 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 1,349 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 9,472 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 1,349 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (214 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ▲ 44 | Wendy |
72.2% | 6734 | 87 | 0.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | ▼ 1 | Nori |
63.7% | 19136 | 100 | 2.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | ▼ 1 | Damian |
61.3% | 12200 | 96 | 1.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | ▲ 3 | Starr Nova |
59.6% | 12412 | 96 | 1.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | ▲ 10 | Ash |
59.2% | 7913 | 89 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 6 | ▲ 2 | Shade |
58.5% | 15433 | 99 | 1.7% | Good pick | ||
| 7 | ▼ 1 | Sirius |
58.6% | 7712 | 89 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 8 | ▼ 3 | Hank |
58.6% | 7092 | 88 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 9 | ▲ 4 | Lumi |
58.3% | 5912 | 85 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 10 | ▼ 7 | Bibi |
55.9% | 42855 | 100 | 4.6% | Good pick | ||
| 11 | – | Larry & Lawrie |
56.7% | 5689 | 85 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 12 | ▲ 8 | Trunk |
56.6% | 6542 | 87 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 13 | ▼ 4 | Clancy |
56.4% | 5705 | 85 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 14 | ▲ 3 | Willow |
56.2% | 7149 | 88 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | ▲ 3 | Doug |
55.8% | 9376 | 92 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 16 | ▼ 4 | Jacky |
55.7% | 10691 | 94 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 17 | ▲ 8 | Moe |
56.2% | 4215 | 80 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 18 | ▼ 8 | Griff |
55.0% | 19513 | 100 | 2.1% | Solid | ||
| 19 | – | Gale |
55.1% | 7599 | 89 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 20 | ▲ 10 | Gigi |
55.6% | 4204 | 80 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 21 | ▼ 17 | Emz |
54.6% | 15942 | 100 | 1.7% | Solid | ||
| 22 | ▲ 6 | Ziggy |
55.7% | 2798 | 74 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 23 | ▼ 1 | Juju |
55.6% | 2710 | 73 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 24 | ▼ 8 | Kenji |
54.1% | 18234 | 100 | 2.0% | Solid | ||
| 25 | ▼ 2 | Cordelius |
54.3% | 9350 | 92 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 26 | ▼ 2 | Buzz |
54.0% | 12821 | 97 | 1.4% | Solid | ||
| 27 | ▼ 6 | Tara |
54.3% | 6694 | 87 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 28 | ▼ 2 | Melodie |
54.0% | 5584 | 84 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 29 | ▲ 3 | Mina |
53.7% | 8336 | 90 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 30 | ▲ 5 | Ollie |
54.4% | 2937 | 75 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 31 | ▼ 17 | Frank |
53.1% | 24155 | 100 | 2.6% | Solid | ||
| 32 | ▲ 6 | Draco |
53.9% | 4286 | 80 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 33 | – | Berry |
53.7% | 4785 | 82 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 34 | – | Sam |
53.6% | 5047 | 83 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 35 | ▼ 6 | Max |
53.0% | 10198 | 93 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 36 | ▲ 10 | Lou |
53.0% | 4105 | 80 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 37 | ▲ 3 | Otis |
52.9% | 4512 | 81 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 38 | ▲ 22 | Bolt |
52.7% | 4772 | 82 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 39 | ▲ 2 | Maisie |
52.3% | 5957 | 85 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 40 | ▲ 7 | Sandy |
52.3% | 4553 | 81 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 41 | ▲ 1 | Jae-Yong |
53.1% | 2044 | 69 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 42 | ▲ 23 | Meg |
52.1% | 6484 | 86 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 43 | ▼ 12 | Fang |
51.5% | 11226 | 95 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 44 | ▼ 17 | Spike |
51.3% | 10881 | 94 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 45 | ▲ 4 | Charlie |
52.4% | 2609 | 73 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 46 | ▼ 2 | Sprout |
51.8% | 4605 | 81 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 47 | ▼ 4 | Chester |
51.3% | 9618 | 92 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 48 | ▲ 3 | Pierce |
51.9% | 3510 | 77 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 49 | ▼ 1 | Stu |
50.8% | 12857 | 97 | 1.4% | Solid | ||
| 50 | ▼ 13 | Bull |
50.2% | 27783 | 100 | 3.0% | Rather not | ||
| 51 | ▲ 16 | Ruffs |
51.1% | 3509 | 77 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 52 | ▲ 2 | R-T |
51.2% | 2771 | 74 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | ▼ 1 | Buster |
50.9% | 3436 | 77 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | ▼ 15 | Surge |
49.8% | 27497 | 100 | 3.0% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | ▼ 19 | Dynamike |
49.6% | 28219 | 100 | 3.0% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | ▲ 13 | Meeple |
50.4% | 4802 | 82 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | ▼ 2 | Pearl |
50.4% | 4342 | 80 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▲ 6 | Kaze |
49.8% | 5704 | 85 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | ▲ 2 | Carl |
49.2% | 8368 | 90 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | ▼ 10 | Darryl |
48.8% | 12720 | 97 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | ▲ 5 | Bo |
49.2% | 4647 | 82 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▼ 3 | Kit |
48.8% | 6671 | 87 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▼ 6 | Colette |
48.5% | 7587 | 89 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▲ 4 | Squeak |
48.9% | 3822 | 79 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▼ 9 | El Primo |
47.2% | 23442 | 100 | 2.5% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▼ 13 | Mortis |
47.0% | 28491 | 100 | 3.1% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▼ 5 | Tick |
47.1% | 8742 | 91 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▲ 5 | Amber |
47.4% | 3128 | 76 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▲ 5 | Glowy |
47.0% | 2135 | 70 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▲ 2 | Mico |
46.8% | 3048 | 75 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▼ 1 | Leon |
45.8% | 6179 | 86 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▼ 9 | Nita |
44.9% | 19997 | 100 | 2.1% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▲ 6 | Alli |
45.7% | 2840 | 74 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▲ 2 | Barley |
45.0% | 9667 | 92 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▲ 2 | Lily |
45.3% | 4456 | 81 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▼ 2 | Rico |
43.8% | 28099 | 100 | 3.0% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▲ 4 | Grom |
44.3% | 3646 | 78 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▲ 4 | Finx |
44.6% | 2108 | 70 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▼ 21 | Edgar |
43.3% | 45761 | 100 | 4.9% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▼ 2 | Jessie |
44.0% | 5365 | 84 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▼ 9 | Crow |
43.2% | 8756 | 91 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▲ 2 | Najia |
43.7% | 1900 | 68 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | – | Rosa |
42.0% | 7969 | 90 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▼ 4 | Shelly |
39.9% | 28841 | 100 | 3.1% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▲ 10 | Gray |
40.4% | 3404 | 77 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▼ 1 | Lola |
40.0% | 2370 | 71 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▼ 1 | Poco |
38.9% | 9244 | 92 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | – | Penny |
39.0% | 4197 | 80 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▲ 2 | Eve |
38.8% | 1494 | 65 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▲ 3 | Byron |
38.5% | 2860 | 74 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▼ 4 | Mr. P |
38.2% | 2633 | 73 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▼ 2 | Nani |
38.0% | 3465 | 77 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▼ 1 | Bea |
37.9% | 3549 | 77 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▼ 5 | Colt |
37.3% | 20436 | 100 | 2.2% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▼ 1 | Pam |
37.8% | 3172 | 76 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▲ 2 | Mandy |
37.7% | 3100 | 75 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▼ 1 | Bonnie |
36.9% | 2437 | 72 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▲ 1 | Janet |
36.9% | 1670 | 66 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▲ 1 | 8-Bit |
36.6% | 6500 | 87 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▼ 3 | Brock |
36.1% | 11630 | 95 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | – | Gus |
35.5% | 3482 | 77 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | – | Belle |
32.1% | 1870 | 68 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | – | Gene |
30.1% | 2260 | 71 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | – | Piper |
28.4% | 2276 | 71 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Chuck |
26.2% | 1390 | 63 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Angelo |
25.9% | 1401 | 64 | 0.2% | Rather not |