
Duo Showdown
103,395 battles collected on this map.
OPEN — more choice than on most maps: 61 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
Showdown has no win or loss — the API only reports the placement. The percentage here says how often the battle ended with a trophy gain (place 1–2 of 5 teams; from the next place down it costs trophies). It cannot be compared with a win rate — the brawlers can be compared with each other.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest two-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the two brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 620 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 3,564 real line-ups. In Showdown this counts a trophy gain, not a win.
What you see here. The best two-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 620 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 3,564 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (13 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Wendy |
78.4% | 14537 | 99 | 1.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | ▲ 6 | Bolt |
66.6% | 3277 | 76 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Nori |
64.7% | 39526 | 100 | 4.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | ▼ 3 | Starr Nova |
65.2% | 8500 | 91 | 1.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | ▲ 3 | Mico |
64.3% | 2917 | 75 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | ▲ 1 | Mina |
64.1% | 3308 | 76 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | ▼ 1 | Chester |
62.8% | 5256 | 83 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | ▲ 2 | Sirius |
62.2% | 4081 | 80 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | ▼ 3 | Alli |
62.5% | 2520 | 72 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | ▲ 20 | Meeple |
62.4% | 2616 | 73 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | ▲ 17 | Jae-Yong |
63.4% | 1447 | 64 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 12 | ▲ 9 | Finx |
62.9% | 1641 | 66 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 13 | ▲ 6 | Doug |
61.3% | 3473 | 77 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 14 | ▲ 3 | Kit |
60.3% | 10586 | 94 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 15 | ▲ 4 | Draco |
62.8% | 1469 | 64 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 16 | ▼ 3 | Pierce |
60.9% | 4113 | 80 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 17 | ▼ 9 | Kaze |
61.0% | 3591 | 78 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 18 | ▲ 7 | Gray |
60.9% | 3653 | 78 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 19 | ▲ 19 | R-T |
63.3% | 1015 | 59 | 0.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 20 | ▼ 2 | Janet |
61.6% | 1861 | 68 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 21 | ▲ 25 | Sam |
62.3% | 1309 | 63 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 22 | ▼ 6 | Stu |
59.8% | 6722 | 87 | 0.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 23 | ▲ 19 | Angelo |
60.9% | 1976 | 69 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 24 | – | Glowy |
60.3% | 2776 | 74 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 25 | – | Damian |
61.5% | 1374 | 63 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 26 | ▲ 14 | Bo |
59.3% | 5709 | 85 | 0.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 27 | ▲ 11 | Shade |
59.1% | 5742 | 85 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 28 | ▲ 28 | Moe |
61.5% | 1204 | 61 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 29 | ▲ 11 | Najia |
60.9% | 1449 | 64 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 30 | ▲ 26 | Sprout |
60.2% | 2047 | 69 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 31 | ▼ 7 | Mortis |
58.3% | 12781 | 97 | 1.5% | Good pick | ||
| 32 | ▲ 2 | Gus |
59.0% | 4014 | 79 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 33 | ▲ 26 | Ruffs |
60.3% | 1598 | 66 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 34 | ▲ 14 | Trunk |
59.4% | 2004 | 69 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 35 | ▲ 14 | Lumi |
59.2% | 2218 | 70 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 36 | ▲ 27 | Gigi |
59.6% | 1670 | 66 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 37 | ▲ 14 | Lola |
58.9% | 2331 | 71 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 38 | ▲ 16 | Mandy |
57.5% | 5493 | 84 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 39 | ▲ 12 | Nani |
57.4% | 4195 | 80 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 40 | ▼ 22 | Willow |
58.9% | 1476 | 64 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 41 | ▲ 34 | Amber |
57.2% | 3183 | 76 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 42 | ▲ 24 | Juju |
59.6% | 767 | 55 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 43 | ▼ 8 | Hank |
56.9% | 1385 | 63 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 44 | ▲ 4 | Chuck |
59.1% | 570 | 50 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 45 | ▲ 11 | Ziggy |
57.7% | 867 | 56 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 46 | ▼ 12 | Piper |
53.7% | 12123 | 96 | 1.5% | Good pick | ||
| 47 | ▼ 6 | Meg |
53.4% | 11915 | 96 | 1.5% | Good pick | ||
| 48 | ▼ 7 | Pearl |
52.1% | 6756 | 87 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 49 | ▼ 21 | Griff |
51.1% | 17427 | 100 | 2.1% | Solid | ||
| 50 | ▼ 15 | Carl |
50.8% | 8703 | 91 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 51 | ▼ 4 | Byron |
50.6% | 8531 | 91 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 52 | ▼ 15 | Otis |
49.8% | 6326 | 86 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 53 | ▼ 7 | Emz |
49.1% | 20242 | 100 | 2.5% | Solid | ||
| 54 | ▼ 19 | Frank |
49.3% | 12354 | 96 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 55 | ▼ 7 | Bibi |
48.8% | 14082 | 98 | 1.7% | Solid | ||
| 56 | ▼ 19 | Edgar |
48.1% | 54819 | 100 | 6.6% | Solid | ||
| 57 | ▲ 2 | Brock |
48.0% | 22593 | 100 | 2.7% | Solid | ||
| 58 | ▼ 7 | Fang |
48.3% | 10037 | 93 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 59 | ▲ 2 | Bea |
48.2% | 7606 | 89 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 60 | ▼ 8 | Surge |
47.6% | 19541 | 100 | 2.4% | Solid | ||
| 61 | ▲ 1 | Leon |
47.6% | 15608 | 100 | 1.9% | Solid | ||
| 62 | ▼ 2 | Poco |
47.7% | 7912 | 89 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 63 | – | 8-Bit |
47.4% | 15034 | 99 | 1.8% | Solid | ||
| 64 | ▲ 2 | Squeak |
47.6% | 7428 | 89 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 65 | ▼ 13 | Pam |
47.8% | 5251 | 83 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 66 | ▼ 5 | Max |
46.9% | 11445 | 95 | 1.4% | Solid | ||
| 67 | ▼ 31 | Ash |
47.0% | 5316 | 84 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 68 | ▼ 3 | Kenji |
46.6% | 12202 | 96 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 69 | ▲ 4 | Belle |
46.9% | 5636 | 84 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 70 | ▼ 5 | Gale |
46.5% | 6200 | 86 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▼ 2 | Jessie |
46.3% | 7332 | 88 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▼ 1 | Spike |
45.6% | 16144 | 100 | 2.0% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▼ 3 | Maisie |
46.0% | 6181 | 86 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▼ 18 | Cordelius |
45.7% | 8724 | 91 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▼ 9 | Bonnie |
46.0% | 3969 | 79 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▼ 22 | Darryl |
45.2% | 8024 | 90 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▼ 3 | Rico |
44.7% | 21321 | 100 | 2.6% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | – | Colt |
44.6% | 23687 | 100 | 2.9% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▲ 1 | Tick |
45.1% | 6296 | 86 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▲ 3 | Penny |
45.0% | 6368 | 86 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▼ 16 | Buster |
45.1% | 3324 | 76 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▼ 16 | Jacky |
44.8% | 5325 | 84 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▲ 1 | Colette |
44.3% | 11053 | 94 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▼ 14 | Lily |
44.3% | 7778 | 89 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▼ 7 | Nita |
44.0% | 13448 | 97 | 1.7% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▼ 16 | Rosa |
44.4% | 5144 | 83 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▲ 2 | Lou |
44.3% | 5371 | 84 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | – | Dynamike |
43.9% | 11211 | 95 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▼ 4 | Eve |
43.9% | 3948 | 79 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▼ 7 | Shelly |
43.1% | 24795 | 100 | 3.1% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▲ 2 | Melodie |
43.2% | 4946 | 82 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | – | Sandy |
43.1% | 5301 | 83 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▲ 1 | Gene |
43.2% | 4220 | 80 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | – | Tara |
42.3% | 11183 | 95 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▼ 2 | Crow |
42.1% | 16915 | 100 | 2.1% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▼ 9 | Charlie |
42.4% | 4690 | 82 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▼ 9 | El Primo |
40.9% | 12230 | 96 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▼ 2 | Ollie |
41.5% | 2412 | 72 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▼ 11 | Buzz |
40.6% | 8079 | 90 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▼ 9 | Bull |
40.5% | 10643 | 94 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▼ 1 | Larry & Lawrie |
39.2% | 5359 | 84 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▲ 1 | Barley |
38.5% | 5918 | 85 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | – | Mr. P |
36.7% | 4627 | 81 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | – | Berry |
36.6% | 4453 | 81 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | ▲ 1 | Clancy |
36.3% | 3648 | 78 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | ▼ 1 | Grom |
34.2% | 3759 | 78 | 0.5% | Rather not |