
Duo Showdown
81,478 battles collected on this map.
OPEN — more choice than on most maps: 96 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
Showdown has no win or loss — the API only reports the placement. The percentage here says how often the battle ended with a trophy gain (place 1–2 of 5 teams; from the next place down it costs trophies). It cannot be compared with a win rate — the brawlers can be compared with each other.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest two-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the two brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 188 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 853 real line-ups. In Showdown this counts a trophy gain, not a win.
What you see here. The best two-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 188 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 853 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (9 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Top-2 rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Wendy |
75.6% | 2607 | 73 | 3.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Nori |
66.6% | 7721 | 89 | 9.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Bolt |
68.9% | 885 | 57 | 1.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | ▲ 3 | Damian |
70.1% | 345 | 43 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | ▼ 23 | Najia |
68.1% | 461 | 47 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 6 | ▼ 9 | Starr Nova |
64.9% | 2112 | 70 | 2.6% | Good pick | ||
| 7 | – | Meg |
65.5% | 1283 | 62 | 1.6% | Good pick | ||
| 8 | ▼ 1 | Jae-Yong |
70.3% | 249 | 38 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 9 | ▲ 17 | Finx |
68.8% | 336 | 42 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 10 | ▲ 52 | Ziggy |
69.7% | 267 | 39 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 11 | ▲ 13 | Draco |
67.5% | 375 | 44 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 12 | ▲ 5 | Ash |
69.2% | 234 | 37 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 13 | ▲ 30 | Gigi |
67.7% | 316 | 41 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 14 | ▲ 17 | Shade |
65.5% | 631 | 52 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | ▼ 1 | Lumi |
66.0% | 500 | 48 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 16 | ▲ 33 | Sprout |
66.6% | 407 | 45 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | ▲ 5 | Mico |
64.9% | 800 | 55 | 1.0% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | ▼ 15 | Ruffs |
65.6% | 544 | 49 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | ▲ 32 | Buster |
68.6% | 229 | 36 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | ▲ 25 | R-T |
67.7% | 263 | 39 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | ▲ 24 | Trunk |
71.2% | 139 | 29 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | ▼ 3 | Otis |
63.9% | 975 | 58 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 23 | ▲ 7 | Juju |
66.8% | 283 | 40 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 24 | ▲ 13 | Pam |
66.7% | 282 | 40 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 25 | ▼ 14 | Pierce |
63.2% | 1277 | 62 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 26 | ▲ 10 | Rosa |
66.4% | 241 | 37 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 27 | ▲ 3 | Gray |
63.1% | 799 | 55 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 28 | ▲ 67 | Clancy |
66.0% | 206 | 35 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 29 | ▼ 23 | Mina |
62.1% | 1118 | 60 | 1.4% | Solid | ||
| 30 | ▼ 1 | Grom |
68.2% | 129 | 28 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 31 | ▲ 4 | Moe |
63.7% | 424 | 46 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 32 | ▼ 8 | Sirius |
62.3% | 907 | 57 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 33 | ▼ 12 | Belle |
63.4% | 486 | 48 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 34 | ▲ 27 | Glowy |
63.0% | 567 | 50 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 35 | ▲ 10 | Gene |
63.8% | 348 | 43 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 36 | ▼ 17 | Chester |
61.7% | 1061 | 59 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 37 | ▲ 47 | Janet |
62.4% | 559 | 50 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 38 | ▲ 60 | Bonnie |
65.0% | 200 | 34 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 39 | ▼ 42 | Penny |
62.9% | 423 | 46 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 40 | ▼ 28 | Fang |
61.5% | 1017 | 59 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 41 | ▲ 20 | Willow |
63.6% | 305 | 41 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 42 | ▼ 6 | Maisie |
63.0% | 359 | 43 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 43 | ▼ 18 | Kenji |
60.8% | 1430 | 64 | 1.7% | Rather not | ||
| 44 | ▲ 45 | Lola |
63.5% | 285 | 40 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 45 | ▲ 63 | Ollie |
65.9% | 138 | 29 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 46 | ▲ 9 | Alli |
61.7% | 666 | 52 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 47 | ▲ 16 | Pearl |
62.2% | 421 | 46 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 48 | ▲ 25 | Amber |
62.2% | 418 | 45 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 49 | ▼ 14 | Charlie |
62.9% | 275 | 39 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 50 | ▲ 3 | Doug |
62.0% | 379 | 44 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 51 | – | Kaze |
60.6% | 836 | 56 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 52 | ▼ 4 | Hank |
65.0% | 123 | 27 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | ▼ 18 | Griff |
59.9% | 1569 | 65 | 1.9% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | ▼ 7 | Tara |
61.7% | 379 | 44 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | ▲ 5 | Sandy |
62.3% | 281 | 40 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | ▼ 19 | Carl |
60.6% | 736 | 54 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | ▼ 27 | Tick |
61.3% | 393 | 45 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▼ 17 | Brock |
59.3% | 2278 | 71 | 2.8% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | ▲ 22 | Lou |
60.8% | 508 | 48 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | ▼ 14 | Lily |
60.1% | 853 | 56 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | ▲ 19 | Poco |
60.8% | 436 | 46 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▲ 16 | Nani |
60.1% | 547 | 49 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▲ 32 | Meeple |
59.7% | 732 | 54 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | – | Jacky |
62.0% | 137 | 29 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▼ 17 | Surge |
58.1% | 2861 | 74 | 3.5% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▲ 29 | Sam |
61.5% | 156 | 31 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▼ 33 | Max |
59.0% | 977 | 58 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▼ 36 | Emz |
59.0% | 895 | 57 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▼ 17 | Melodie |
59.9% | 389 | 44 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▼ 22 | Chuck |
61.2% | 170 | 32 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▼ 42 | Kit |
58.3% | 1986 | 69 | 2.4% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▲ 1 | Leon |
58.6% | 1247 | 62 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▲ 9 | 8-Bit |
59.2% | 669 | 53 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▼ 37 | Cordelius |
59.0% | 812 | 55 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▼ 26 | Bo |
59.3% | 572 | 50 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▲ 21 | Gus |
59.3% | 472 | 47 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▼ 17 | Angelo |
59.4% | 409 | 45 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▲ 6 | Mr. P |
60.4% | 192 | 34 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▼ 13 | Eve |
59.7% | 315 | 41 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▲ 9 | Spike |
58.4% | 960 | 58 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▼ 3 | Darryl |
59.4% | 345 | 43 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▲ 13 | Colette |
58.5% | 833 | 56 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▼ 7 | Frank |
59.4% | 298 | 40 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▲ 23 | Squeak |
58.6% | 502 | 48 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▲ 5 | Barley |
59.1% | 232 | 37 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▲ 4 | Nita |
58.3% | 487 | 48 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▼ 12 | Gale |
58.2% | 431 | 46 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▼ 8 | Crow |
57.3% | 1369 | 63 | 1.7% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▲ 26 | Larry & Lawrie |
58.7% | 235 | 37 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▲ 9 | Berry |
58.2% | 287 | 40 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▲ 14 | Byron |
56.3% | 1312 | 63 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▼ 5 | Stu |
56.2% | 1230 | 62 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▼ 24 | Shelly |
56.1% | 964 | 58 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▼ 33 | Edgar |
55.4% | 2473 | 72 | 3.0% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▼ 35 | Mandy |
55.9% | 834 | 56 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▼ 36 | Jessie |
55.8% | 400 | 45 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▼ 17 | Dynamike |
55.4% | 865 | 56 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▼ 23 | Bibi |
55.3% | 884 | 57 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▼ 28 | Bull |
55.2% | 534 | 49 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▼ 33 | Bea |
55.0% | 654 | 52 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▼ 7 | Rico |
54.8% | 989 | 58 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | – | Mortis |
54.3% | 2022 | 69 | 2.5% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | ▼ 2 | El Primo |
54.6% | 313 | 41 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | ▼ 22 | Piper |
53.9% | 1738 | 67 | 2.1% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | ▼ 48 | Buzz |
53.8% | 517 | 49 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | ▼ 4 | Colt |
52.8% | 2073 | 69 | 2.5% | Rather not |