
Gem Grab
187,009 battles collected on this map — ranked only.
OPEN — more choice than on most maps: 43 of 105 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 7,411 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 768 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 7,411 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 768 real line-ups from a different rank tier, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (1,245 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here. The numbers also come from the solo queue: the battles behind them were fought by three strangers, not a practised team.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Bolt |
64.2% | 13855 | 98 | 1.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Clancy |
64.2% | 3707 | 78 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Bo |
56.5% | 33358 | 100 | 3.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | Doug |
57.4% | 4514 | 81 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | – | Ash |
57.4% | 4093 | 80 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | – | Griff |
55.9% | 41547 | 100 | 4.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | – | Bull |
55.8% | 11895 | 96 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | – | Tara |
55.3% | 8455 | 90 | 0.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | – | Surge |
54.6% | 23631 | 100 | 2.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | – | Starr Nova |
54.3% | 18979 | 100 | 2.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | – | Otis |
54.6% | 7402 | 88 | 0.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 12 | ▼ 1 | Fang |
53.9% | 14755 | 99 | 1.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 13 | ▲ 1 | Bibi |
53.9% | 14408 | 98 | 1.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 14 | – | Mina |
54.4% | 4277 | 80 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | ▼ 1 | R-T |
56.8% | 851 | 56 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 16 | – | Chester |
53.6% | 11211 | 95 | 1.2% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | ▼ 1 | Pearl |
54.2% | 4021 | 79 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | – | Stu |
53.3% | 10984 | 94 | 1.1% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | ▼ 1 | Damian |
54.2% | 3336 | 77 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | – | Jessie |
53.4% | 6860 | 87 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | ▲ 3 | Buster |
57.6% | 502 | 48 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | – | Nita |
52.7% | 6299 | 86 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | – | Crow |
51.6% | 28079 | 100 | 2.9% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | – | Edgar |
51.3% | 108015 | 100 | 11.2% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | – | Janet |
53.6% | 1635 | 66 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 26 | – | Gale |
52.7% | 3024 | 75 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 27 | – | Carl |
51.8% | 5177 | 83 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 28 | – | Rico |
50.9% | 28957 | 100 | 3.0% | Good pick | ||
| 29 | – | Mortis |
50.6% | 38671 | 100 | 4.0% | Good pick | ||
| 30 | – | Emz |
50.5% | 47542 | 100 | 4.9% | Good pick | ||
| 31 | – | Sam |
54.2% | 603 | 51 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 32 | – | Lily |
50.7% | 10543 | 94 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 33 | – | Charlie |
51.6% | 2817 | 74 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 34 | – | Moe |
52.4% | 1219 | 61 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 35 | – | 8-Bit |
50.2% | 14018 | 98 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 36 | ▲ 1 | Rosa |
51.2% | 2523 | 72 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 37 | – | Trunk |
49.7% | 25492 | 100 | 2.6% | Solid | ||
| 38 | ▼ 1 | Ruffs |
51.6% | 1452 | 64 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 39 | – | Meg |
50.1% | 6496 | 87 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 40 | – | Kenji |
49.5% | 9524 | 92 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 41 | – | Darryl |
50.1% | 3730 | 78 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 42 | – | Penny |
49.8% | 4809 | 82 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 43 | – | Finx |
51.1% | 1169 | 61 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 44 | – | Tick |
49.0% | 10096 | 93 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 45 | ▲ 1 | Sandy |
49.9% | 2721 | 73 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 46 | ▲ 1 | Cordelius |
49.1% | 6872 | 87 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 47 | ▼ 1 | Spike |
48.6% | 11806 | 95 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 48 | ▼ 2 | Maisie |
50.2% | 1312 | 63 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 49 | ▲ 1 | Nori |
47.9% | 97592 | 100 | 10.1% | Solid | ||
| 50 | – | Gray |
49.6% | 2045 | 69 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 51 | – | Poco |
49.0% | 3658 | 78 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 52 | – | Alli |
48.8% | 4080 | 80 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 53 | – | Mico |
49.0% | 2529 | 72 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 54 | – | Gus |
48.9% | 2680 | 73 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 55 | – | Max |
47.9% | 8092 | 90 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 56 | – | Lola |
49.8% | 757 | 54 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 57 | – | Ollie |
52.4% | 231 | 37 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 58 | ▲ 1 | Mr. P |
48.9% | 1281 | 62 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 59 | – | Chuck |
49.1% | 1108 | 60 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 60 | ▼ 1 | Pierce |
47.9% | 4182 | 80 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 61 | – | Lumi |
48.1% | 2843 | 74 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 62 | ▲ 1 | Buzz |
47.6% | 4663 | 82 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 63 | ▲ 1 | Sirius |
47.5% | 4465 | 81 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | – | Lou |
48.0% | 2027 | 69 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▼ 1 | Glowy |
48.6% | 1015 | 59 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | – | Kit |
47.2% | 5005 | 83 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▼ 1 | Gigi |
48.4% | 1123 | 60 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | – | Draco |
48.2% | 875 | 57 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | – | Meeple |
46.9% | 3631 | 78 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | – | Leon |
45.9% | 11577 | 95 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | – | Hank |
48.1% | 620 | 51 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | – | Frank |
45.9% | 7902 | 89 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | – | Shelly |
45.6% | 8925 | 91 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | – | Colt |
45.3% | 13675 | 98 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▼ 1 | Colette |
45.4% | 7940 | 90 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | – | Amber |
46.2% | 1910 | 68 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▲ 1 | Brock |
45.0% | 19242 | 100 | 2.0% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | – | Bea |
45.7% | 2332 | 71 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | – | Jacky |
46.2% | 1168 | 61 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | – | El Primo |
44.7% | 3717 | 78 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | – | Pam |
45.5% | 1145 | 61 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | – | Juju |
46.9% | 147 | 30 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | – | Byron |
43.2% | 5056 | 83 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | – | Najia |
43.7% | 1690 | 66 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | – | Shade |
43.3% | 3410 | 77 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | – | Eve |
44.1% | 653 | 52 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | – | Mandy |
43.1% | 2736 | 74 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | – | Jae-Yong |
43.9% | 328 | 42 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | – | Kaze |
41.6% | 43977 | 100 | 4.6% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | – | Belle |
42.2% | 1211 | 61 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | – | Ziggy |
42.3% | 395 | 45 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | – | Melodie |
42.0% | 978 | 58 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | – | Dynamike |
41.1% | 5882 | 85 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | – | Squeak |
40.9% | 5192 | 83 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | – | Willow |
39.9% | 18243 | 100 | 1.9% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | – | Angelo |
40.0% | 275 | 39 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | – | Nani |
39.0% | 1445 | 64 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | – | Piper |
38.7% | 3961 | 79 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | – | Sprout |
38.8% | 775 | 55 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | – | Gene |
38.6% | 1328 | 63 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | – | Grom |
38.1% | 998 | 58 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | – | Berry |
37.1% | 1069 | 60 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | – | Larry & Lawrie |
36.7% | 1028 | 59 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | – | Bonnie |
35.9% | 696 | 53 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Barley |
32.5% | 1016 | 59 | 0.1% | Rather not |