
Bounty
65,920 battles collected on this map.
MEDIUM — an average amount of choice: 52 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 4,892 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 258 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 4,892 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 258 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (95 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Wendy |
70.4% | 2639 | 73 | 0.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Bolt |
66.3% | 3474 | 77 | 0.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Janet |
62.6% | 2098 | 70 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | ▲ 1 | Nori |
59.1% | 9015 | 91 | 2.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | ▲ 1 | Kenji |
58.1% | 11316 | 95 | 2.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | ▼ 2 | Starr Nova |
58.9% | 3969 | 79 | 1.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | ▲ 1 | Hank |
59.3% | 2760 | 74 | 0.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | ▼ 1 | Tick |
57.4% | 22264 | 100 | 5.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | ▲ 2 | Mico |
58.7% | 2546 | 73 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | ▲ 7 | Shade |
57.9% | 2954 | 75 | 0.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | ▼ 2 | Mina |
58.1% | 2105 | 70 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 12 | ▼ 2 | Sirius |
57.0% | 4726 | 82 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 13 | ▲ 2 | Ziggy |
58.3% | 1609 | 66 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 14 | ▼ 2 | Mandy |
55.9% | 11762 | 95 | 3.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 15 | ▼ 2 | Squeak |
55.9% | 10260 | 93 | 2.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 16 | ▲ 12 | Gigi |
58.4% | 1224 | 62 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 17 | ▼ 1 | Pierce |
56.2% | 4888 | 82 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 18 | ▲ 1 | Bo |
56.5% | 3349 | 77 | 0.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 19 | ▼ 1 | Juju |
58.6% | 954 | 58 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 20 | ▼ 6 | Gray |
56.0% | 4289 | 80 | 1.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 21 | ▼ 1 | Sprout |
57.0% | 1866 | 68 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 22 | ▲ 2 | Bibi |
54.6% | 8152 | 90 | 2.1% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | ▼ 1 | Moe |
56.4% | 1414 | 64 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | ▲ 2 | Ruffs |
56.6% | 1245 | 62 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | – | Damian |
57.0% | 1017 | 59 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 26 | ▲ 1 | Kit |
54.3% | 7960 | 90 | 2.0% | Good pick | ||
| 27 | ▼ 6 | Amber |
55.4% | 1766 | 67 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 28 | ▲ 1 | Carl |
54.2% | 3460 | 77 | 0.9% | Good pick | ||
| 29 | ▲ 2 | Najia |
55.7% | 1185 | 61 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 30 | ▼ 7 | Nani |
54.2% | 2598 | 73 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 31 | ▲ 2 | R-T |
56.6% | 730 | 54 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 32 | – | Meeple |
54.3% | 2328 | 71 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 33 | ▲ 8 | Lumi |
55.5% | 1022 | 59 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 34 | ▲ 9 | Sam |
55.4% | 982 | 58 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 35 | ▲ 3 | Mortis |
52.5% | 12614 | 96 | 3.2% | Good pick | ||
| 36 | ▼ 6 | Willow |
54.6% | 1312 | 63 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 37 | ▼ 3 | Larry & Lawrie |
53.9% | 2029 | 69 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 38 | ▲ 2 | Chuck |
55.0% | 878 | 57 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 39 | – | Jae-Yong |
56.3% | 547 | 49 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 40 | ▲ 2 | Alli |
52.7% | 2403 | 72 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 41 | ▼ 6 | Griff |
51.7% | 6632 | 87 | 1.7% | Good pick | ||
| 42 | ▼ 6 | Rosa |
52.1% | 3510 | 77 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 43 | ▼ 6 | Penny |
51.8% | 4661 | 82 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 44 | ▲ 6 | Kaze |
52.6% | 1626 | 66 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 45 | ▲ 16 | Finx |
53.7% | 738 | 54 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 46 | ▲ 13 | Trunk |
53.3% | 675 | 53 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 47 | ▼ 2 | Doug |
51.8% | 1454 | 64 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 48 | ▼ 2 | Berry |
50.8% | 3370 | 77 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 49 | – | Chester |
50.6% | 1777 | 67 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 50 | ▲ 4 | Draco |
51.8% | 598 | 51 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 51 | ▼ 7 | Meg |
49.2% | 4976 | 83 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 52 | ▼ 5 | Glowy |
50.4% | 1212 | 61 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 53 | ▲ 16 | Lola |
51.2% | 720 | 54 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 54 | ▲ 3 | Lily |
49.0% | 3964 | 79 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 55 | ▼ 7 | Dynamike |
48.4% | 10027 | 93 | 2.5% | Solid | ||
| 56 | ▼ 4 | Stu |
49.1% | 1966 | 69 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 57 | ▲ 5 | Gus |
48.9% | 1861 | 68 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 58 | ▼ 3 | Emz |
47.8% | 6966 | 88 | 1.8% | Solid | ||
| 59 | ▲ 6 | Barley |
48.2% | 3367 | 77 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 60 | ▼ 4 | Jessie |
47.6% | 3662 | 78 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 61 | ▲ 3 | Piper |
46.6% | 14131 | 98 | 3.6% | Solid | ||
| 62 | ▼ 11 | Eve |
47.8% | 1818 | 67 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 63 | ▼ 3 | Spike |
46.9% | 5010 | 83 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 64 | ▲ 10 | Angelo |
47.9% | 1179 | 61 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▼ 7 | Max |
46.8% | 2709 | 73 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▲ 1 | Ollie |
48.7% | 478 | 47 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▲ 3 | Buster |
47.0% | 1132 | 60 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▼ 5 | Poco |
45.7% | 4452 | 81 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▼ 16 | Lou |
46.4% | 1501 | 65 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▲ 1 | Bonnie |
46.5% | 1356 | 63 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▼ 5 | Bull |
45.5% | 4734 | 82 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | – | Brock |
44.9% | 11926 | 96 | 3.0% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▼ 5 | Crow |
44.9% | 6352 | 86 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▲ 4 | Pearl |
45.5% | 1757 | 67 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▲ 8 | El Primo |
44.8% | 3218 | 76 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | – | Byron |
44.3% | 8152 | 90 | 2.1% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▼ 2 | Ash |
45.4% | 1391 | 63 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▲ 1 | Edgar |
43.9% | 14974 | 99 | 3.8% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▼ 6 | Surge |
43.8% | 6225 | 86 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▲ 8 | Grom |
44.1% | 3094 | 75 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▲ 1 | Colette |
44.0% | 3329 | 77 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▼ 1 | Rico |
43.5% | 7300 | 88 | 1.8% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▼ 6 | 8-Bit |
43.9% | 3302 | 76 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | – | Melodie |
43.9% | 2325 | 71 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | – | Nita |
43.7% | 2988 | 75 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▼ 6 | Pam |
44.2% | 1260 | 62 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▼ 1 | Colt |
42.8% | 10625 | 94 | 2.7% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▲ 1 | Tara |
43.2% | 1851 | 68 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▼ 2 | Leon |
42.6% | 3652 | 78 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | – | Frank |
42.2% | 4476 | 81 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▲ 1 | Maisie |
41.7% | 1449 | 64 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▼ 1 | Shelly |
40.4% | 4322 | 80 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▲ 1 | Belle |
40.2% | 2595 | 73 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▲ 2 | Cordelius |
40.3% | 1621 | 66 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▼ 2 | Fang |
39.9% | 3143 | 76 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▼ 1 | Mr. P |
39.5% | 1716 | 67 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▲ 3 | Sandy |
38.9% | 1434 | 64 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▼ 1 | Gale |
38.1% | 1481 | 64 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | – | Buzz |
37.7% | 1822 | 67 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▼ 2 | Gene |
37.6% | 1734 | 67 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▲ 3 | Bea |
37.4% | 3254 | 76 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▲ 1 | Charlie |
37.1% | 984 | 58 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | ▼ 2 | Darryl |
37.0% | 1855 | 68 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | ▲ 1 | Otis |
35.8% | 1580 | 65 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | ▼ 3 | Clancy |
34.7% | 1062 | 59 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Jacky |
30.1% | 1300 | 62 | 0.3% | Rather not |