Gem Grab

Ancestral Roots

52,998 battles collected on this map.

TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 49 of 106 brawlers above 50%.

Recommendation

Damage Dealer 1626 games

Damage Dealer 1035 games

Controller 5989 games

Damage Dealer 2238 games

Damage Dealer 1254 games

Damage Dealer 700 games

Controller 1480 games

What the rating, star, trust and the tags mean

Strong pickThe rank on this map among all map/brawler rows of the mode (Gem Grab): Strong pick top tenth, Good pick top quarter, Solid upper half, Rather not the rest. The thresholds come from the field — the exact values are in the badge's tooltip. Not the tier list: that counts how many maps of the rotation a brawler is usable on. Rather not among the recommended eight therefore does not mean “bad”, but: this map has nothing better to offer.

TrustHow dependable the win rate next to it is, 0–100. Depends purely on the number of games — not on how good the brawler is.

Carry — becomes star player unusually often on this map: he deals the damage and takes the objective. The game runs through him.

Hidden gems & traps

From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.

Underrated

Damian 69.4%Winrate 1,489 games

Sirius 64.7%Winrate 2,090 games

Chuck 64.2%Winrate 1,626 games

Moe 65.3%Winrate 1,035 games

Overrated

Edgar 45.1%Winrate 12,594 games

Emz 45.9%Winrate 8,975 games

Rico 45.3%Winrate 6,558 games

Brock 43.1%Winrate 6,678 games

If you queue as three

The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.

Searched freely across 8,990 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 912 real line-ups.

66.4% expected

66.4% expected

66.4% expected

66.4% expected

66.4% expected

66.4% expected

How these numbers are arrived at

What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.

Best · on this map. All 8,990 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 912 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.

What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (358 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.

All brawlers on this map

Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.

#		Brawler	Win rate	Games	Trust	Pick rate	Rating
1	–	Wendy	74.2%	4451	81	1.0%	Strong pick
2	–	Bolt	70.6%	8854	91	2.6%	Strong pick
3	–	Nori	67.4%	11111	95	3.4%	Strong pick
4	–	Damian	69.4%	1489	64	0.4%	Strong pick
5	–	Starr Nova	66.8%	4100	80	1.2%	Strong pick
6	–	Sirius	64.7%	2090	70	0.6%	Strong pick
7	–	Chuck	64.2%	1626	66	0.5%	Strong pick
8	–	Pierce	63.1%	2579	73	0.8%	Strong pick
9	–	Moe	65.3%	1035	59	0.2%	Strong pick
10	–	Shade	62.9%	1896	68	0.7%	Strong pick
11	–	Bo	61.1%	5989	85	1.7%	Strong pick
12	–	Doug	63.3%	1432	64	0.4%	Strong pick
13	–	Chester	62.3%	2238	71	0.7%	Strong pick
14	–	Finx	63.7%	967	58	0.3%	Strong pick
15	–	Trunk	63.1%	1104	60	0.3%	Strong pick
16	–	Gigi	62.6%	1072	60	0.3%	Strong pick
17	–	Mina	61.4%	1662	66	0.5%	Strong pick
18	–	Kaze	60.9%	1783	67	0.5%	Strong pick
19	–	Jae-Yong	63.5%	715	54	0.2%	Strong pick
20	–	Draco	62.6%	852	56	0.3%	Strong pick
21	–	Lumi	61.1%	1254	62	0.3%	Strong pick
22	–	Najia	61.3%	1044	59	0.3%	Strong pick
23	–	R-T	62.4%	700	53	0.2%	Strong pick
24	–	Glowy	60.7%	1146	61	0.3%	Strong pick
25	–	Janet	60.3%	1215	61	0.3%	Strong pick
26	–	Kit	59.1%	1931	68	0.5%	Good pick
27	–	Gray	59.4%	1583	65	0.4%	Good pick
28	–	Amber	59.0%	1480	64	0.5%	Good pick
29	–	Ziggy	60.8%	760	54	0.2%	Good pick
30	–	Gus	58.7%	1713	67	0.5%	Good pick
31	–	Mico	59.9%	942	58	0.3%	Good pick
32	–	Alli	58.5%	1503	65	0.4%	Good pick
33	–	Mortis	56.4%	7700	89	2.5%	Good pick
34	–	Meeple	58.4%	1234	62	0.3%	Good pick
35	–	Juju	61.2%	469	47	0.1%	Good pick
36	–	Stu	56.6%	2501	72	0.8%	Good pick
37	–	Sam	59.3%	713	53	0.2%	Good pick
38	–	Mandy	56.5%	1961	69	0.5%	Good pick
39	–	Ruffs	57.1%	1013	59	0.3%	Good pick
40	–	Hank	58.0%	705	53	0.2%	Good pick
41	–	Sprout	56.4%	1228	62	0.3%	Good pick
42	–	Lola	55.7%	830	56	0.2%	Solid
43	–	Ash	53.6%	2487	72	0.9%	Solid
44	–	Griff	52.3%	7330	88	2.3%	Solid
45	–	Tara	51.8%	3751	78	1.1%	Solid
46	–	Clancy	51.6%	2546	73	0.8%	Solid
47	–	Jessie	50.5%	4830	82	1.4%	Solid
48	–	Willow	52.7%	769	55	0.2%	Solid
49	–	8-Bit	49.5%	7816	89	2.6%	Solid
50	–	Kenji	49.7%	4917	82	1.4%	Solid
51	–	Fang	49.6%	4853	82	1.5%	Solid
52	–	Surge	49.2%	6365	86	1.9%	Solid
53	–	Carl	49.8%	2788	74	0.9%	Solid
54	–	Lily	49.0%	3259	76	1.0%	Solid
55	–	Meg	48.7%	4398	81	1.4%	Solid
56	–	Nani	50.2%	951	58	0.3%	Solid
57	–	Penny	47.4%	3695	78	1.2%	Rather not
58	–	Crow	46.8%	6271	86	2.0%	Rather not
59	–	Max	46.7%	3731	78	1.2%	Rather not
60	–	Angelo	48.1%	630	52	0.2%	Rather not
61	–	Emz	45.9%	8975	91	2.9%	Rather not
62	–	Charlie	46.9%	1866	68	0.5%	Rather not
63	–	Sandy	46.1%	2827	74	0.9%	Rather not
64	–	Edgar	45.1%	12594	96	4.3%	Rather not
65	–	Rico	45.3%	6558	87	2.3%	Rather not
66	–	Poco	45.2%	4533	81	1.5%	Rather not
67	–	Spike	44.8%	4226	80	1.3%	Rather not
68	–	Otis	45.0%	1903	68	0.6%	Rather not
69	–	Byron	44.3%	3730	78	1.2%	Rather not
70	–	Piper	44.3%	3890	79	1.1%	Rather not
71	–	Tick	43.8%	6484	86	2.1%	Rather not
72	–	Colette	43.9%	3599	78	1.2%	Rather not
73	–	Nita	43.6%	4714	82	1.7%	Rather not
74	–	Frank	43.6%	3510	77	1.1%	Rather not
75	–	Bibi	43.4%	4345	80	1.4%	Rather not
76	–	Lou	43.8%	2011	69	0.6%	Rather not
77	–	Brock	43.1%	6678	87	2.1%	Rather not
78	–	Buzz	43.4%	2543	72	0.8%	Rather not
79	–	Pearl	43.1%	2482	72	0.8%	Rather not
80	–	Bull	42.5%	3580	78	1.1%	Rather not
81	–	Rosa	42.6%	2598	73	0.8%	Rather not
82	–	Colt	41.9%	5777	85	2.0%	Rather not
83	–	Darryl	41.5%	2549	73	0.8%	Rather not
84	–	Leon	41.2%	3949	79	1.3%	Rather not
85	–	Mr. P	41.2%	1906	68	0.6%	Rather not
86	–	Pam	41.0%	2225	70	0.7%	Rather not
87	–	Gale	40.8%	2316	71	0.8%	Rather not
88	–	Belle	40.8%	2026	69	0.7%	Rather not
89	–	Squeak	40.3%	3611	78	1.2%	Rather not
90	–	Cordelius	40.3%	2579	73	0.9%	Rather not
91	–	Dynamike	39.9%	4657	82	1.6%	Rather not
92	–	El Primo	40.0%	3382	77	1.2%	Rather not
93	–	Barley	40.1%	2498	72	0.9%	Rather not
94	–	Bea	40.1%	2564	73	0.8%	Rather not
95	–	Larry & Lawrie	40.1%	1687	66	0.6%	Rather not
96	–	Gene	40.0%	1992	69	0.6%	Rather not
97	–	Berry	39.3%	1853	68	0.6%	Rather not
98	–	Shelly	38.0%	4569	81	1.5%	Rather not
99	–	Ollie	38.0%	1021	59	0.3%	Rather not
100	–	Jacky	37.5%	1743	67	0.6%	Rather not
101	–	Buster	36.7%	1399	64	0.5%	Rather not
102	–	Melodie	36.7%	1796	67	0.6%	Rather not
103	–	Bonnie	35.9%	1414	64	0.5%	Rather not
104	–	Eve	35.7%	1609	66	0.6%	Rather not
105	–	Maisie	35.5%	1704	66	0.6%	Rather not
106	–	Grom	33.9%	1459	64	0.5%	Rather not