
Brawl Ball
452,924 battles collected on this map.
OPEN — more choice than on most maps: 78 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 9,880 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 7,648 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 9,880 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 7,648 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Wendy |
75.8% | 24910 | 100 | 1.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Bolt |
68.8% | 20847 | 100 | 0.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Nori |
66.9% | 104398 | 100 | 3.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | Ash |
66.9% | 18017 | 100 | 0.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | – | Starr Nova |
66.0% | 50268 | 100 | 1.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | – | Damian |
65.6% | 23259 | 100 | 0.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | – | Gigi |
64.1% | 11958 | 96 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | – | Trunk |
63.8% | 10181 | 93 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | – | Lumi |
62.5% | 19276 | 100 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | – | R-T |
62.7% | 5675 | 84 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | – | Clancy |
61.5% | 17188 | 100 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 12 | ▲ 2 | Pearl |
61.6% | 10219 | 93 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 13 | ▼ 1 | Lou |
61.5% | 11967 | 96 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 14 | ▼ 1 | Otis |
61.2% | 15794 | 100 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 15 | – | Shade |
60.8% | 22864 | 100 | 0.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 16 | ▲ 1 | Doug |
60.9% | 13369 | 97 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | ▼ 1 | Sirius |
60.8% | 15134 | 99 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | – | Ollie |
61.3% | 5260 | 83 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | – | Glowy |
61.2% | 5784 | 85 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | ▲ 1 | Charlie |
61.1% | 6124 | 86 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | ▼ 1 | Moe |
60.4% | 14899 | 99 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | – | Jae-Yong |
61.2% | 4560 | 81 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | ▲ 3 | Finx |
60.5% | 5315 | 84 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | ▼ 1 | Sandy |
59.8% | 11699 | 95 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | ▼ 1 | Buster |
60.0% | 5776 | 85 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 26 | ▼ 1 | Pierce |
59.0% | 17699 | 100 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 27 | ▲ 1 | Draco |
59.4% | 8524 | 91 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 28 | ▲ 2 | Ziggy |
59.4% | 6091 | 86 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 29 | ▲ 3 | Kaze |
58.6% | 19212 | 100 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 30 | ▼ 3 | Chester |
58.4% | 28273 | 100 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 31 | ▼ 2 | Mina |
58.3% | 33776 | 100 | 1.1% | Good pick | ||
| 32 | ▼ 1 | Meeple |
58.5% | 13619 | 98 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 33 | ▲ 2 | Sam |
58.7% | 7140 | 88 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 34 | ▼ 1 | Najia |
58.9% | 5194 | 83 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 35 | ▼ 1 | Willow |
57.9% | 11189 | 95 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 36 | ▲ 1 | Alli |
57.9% | 6726 | 87 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 37 | ▲ 1 | Ruffs |
57.6% | 9180 | 92 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 38 | ▼ 2 | Juju |
58.4% | 3347 | 77 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 39 | – | Larry & Lawrie |
57.6% | 7633 | 89 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 40 | ▲ 2 | Cordelius |
56.7% | 20086 | 100 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 41 | ▼ 1 | Tara |
56.6% | 18396 | 100 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 42 | ▲ 2 | Amber |
57.0% | 6752 | 87 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 43 | ▲ 2 | Maisie |
56.5% | 11375 | 95 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 44 | ▼ 1 | Stu |
55.9% | 50623 | 100 | 1.8% | Solid | ||
| 45 | ▼ 4 | Griff |
55.6% | 90575 | 100 | 3.0% | Solid | ||
| 46 | ▲ 2 | Hank |
56.5% | 8141 | 90 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 47 | ▼ 1 | Buzz |
55.9% | 26324 | 100 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 48 | ▲ 2 | Gale |
56.1% | 14632 | 99 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 49 | – | Melodie |
56.0% | 15119 | 99 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 50 | ▲ 1 | Jacky |
55.4% | 11374 | 95 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 51 | ▲ 2 | Bo |
55.2% | 15161 | 99 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 52 | – | Gray |
55.0% | 14558 | 99 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 53 | ▲ 2 | Sprout |
55.0% | 10986 | 94 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 54 | ▼ 7 | Meg |
54.3% | 82012 | 100 | 1.8% | Solid | ||
| 55 | ▲ 1 | Lola |
55.4% | 3762 | 78 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 56 | ▼ 2 | Janet |
55.5% | 3280 | 76 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 57 | – | Berry |
54.5% | 11289 | 95 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 58 | ▲ 2 | Lily |
54.3% | 9850 | 93 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 59 | ▲ 5 | Eve |
55.5% | 2398 | 72 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 60 | ▲ 1 | Kit |
53.9% | 13881 | 98 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 61 | ▲ 4 | Squeak |
54.1% | 8257 | 90 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 62 | ▼ 4 | Max |
53.4% | 38473 | 100 | 1.4% | Solid | ||
| 63 | ▼ 4 | Pam |
54.2% | 5405 | 84 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 64 | ▼ 1 | Carl |
52.8% | 22505 | 100 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 65 | ▼ 3 | Kenji |
52.2% | 61137 | 100 | 2.2% | Solid | ||
| 66 | ▲ 1 | Mico |
53.3% | 4291 | 80 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 67 | ▲ 2 | Grom |
52.7% | 5364 | 84 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▼ 2 | Fang |
51.6% | 42037 | 100 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▼ 1 | Bea |
51.7% | 9562 | 92 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▲ 3 | Bonnie |
52.5% | 3367 | 77 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▼ 1 | Spike |
51.2% | 27101 | 100 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▼ 1 | Byron |
51.1% | 11323 | 95 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▼ 1 | Bull |
50.4% | 45911 | 100 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▲ 2 | Mr. P |
51.5% | 3217 | 76 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▼ 1 | Chuck |
51.8% | 2036 | 69 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▼ 1 | Belle |
51.2% | 3663 | 78 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▲ 5 | Gus |
50.7% | 5931 | 85 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▼ 1 | Darryl |
49.8% | 22027 | 100 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▲ 4 | Colette |
49.8% | 20097 | 100 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▼ 2 | Rosa |
50.1% | 8599 | 91 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▼ 1 | Penny |
49.6% | 9042 | 91 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▲ 2 | Mortis |
48.7% | 124309 | 100 | 4.0% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▼ 4 | Poco |
48.9% | 34938 | 100 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▼ 3 | Jessie |
48.7% | 14262 | 98 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | – | Leon |
48.2% | 16838 | 100 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | – | Mandy |
47.9% | 8768 | 91 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▲ 2 | Nani |
47.9% | 4672 | 82 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▲ 2 | Gene |
47.5% | 3479 | 77 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▼ 2 | Bibi |
46.2% | 92802 | 100 | 3.2% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▲ 4 | Piper |
46.9% | 7393 | 88 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▼ 3 | Brock |
46.1% | 44075 | 100 | 1.7% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▲ 1 | Tick |
46.2% | 22302 | 100 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▼ 1 | Barley |
46.1% | 14096 | 98 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▼ 3 | Emz |
45.5% | 49267 | 100 | 2.1% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▲ 1 | Crow |
43.9% | 35328 | 100 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▼ 1 | Surge |
43.4% | 122668 | 100 | 4.1% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▲ 2 | Angelo |
43.9% | 1617 | 66 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▼ 1 | Dynamike |
42.2% | 82198 | 100 | 3.0% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▼ 1 | Frank |
41.8% | 61060 | 100 | 2.6% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | – | Colt |
38.6% | 103389 | 100 | 4.2% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▲ 1 | 8-Bit |
38.6% | 27802 | 100 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▼ 1 | El Primo |
37.8% | 47382 | 100 | 2.2% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | – | Rico |
37.5% | 85040 | 100 | 3.5% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | – | Nita |
34.5% | 49482 | 100 | 2.4% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Edgar |
32.4% | 151730 | 100 | 7.0% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Shelly |
26.8% | 80384 | 100 | 4.2% | Rather not |