
Bounty
25,843 battles collected on this map.
TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 48 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 5,546 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 360 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 5,546 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 360 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (126 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Wendy |
74.0% | 2528 | 72 | 2.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Bolt |
68.4% | 5048 | 83 | 2.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Nori |
62.2% | 5432 | 84 | 2.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | Pierce |
60.9% | 3899 | 79 | 2.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | – | Starr Nova |
61.8% | 2015 | 69 | 1.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | – | Mina |
60.9% | 1236 | 62 | 0.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | – | Sprout |
60.1% | 904 | 57 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | ▲ 2 | Najia |
58.9% | 1384 | 63 | 0.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | ▼ 1 | Gray |
58.0% | 1903 | 68 | 1.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | ▼ 1 | Kaze |
59.1% | 1000 | 59 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | – | Glowy |
61.0% | 449 | 47 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 12 | – | Ruffs |
58.7% | 741 | 54 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 13 | ▲ 1 | Bo |
56.6% | 1203 | 61 | 0.9% | Good pick | ||
| 14 | ▼ 1 | Gigi |
58.8% | 549 | 50 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | – | Ziggy |
62.2% | 283 | 40 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 16 | – | 8-Bit |
54.7% | 2675 | 73 | 2.1% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | ▲ 1 | Kit |
55.8% | 1168 | 61 | 0.9% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | ▼ 1 | Nani |
54.8% | 1879 | 68 | 1.2% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | ▲ 2 | Mandy |
53.7% | 4090 | 80 | 2.6% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | ▲ 3 | Mico |
58.5% | 376 | 44 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | ▼ 1 | Carl |
54.7% | 1440 | 64 | 1.0% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | ▼ 2 | Meeple |
55.1% | 1046 | 59 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | ▲ 1 | Jae-Yong |
59.6% | 285 | 40 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | – | Angelo |
54.4% | 1430 | 64 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | ▲ 10 | Amber |
56.5% | 485 | 48 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 26 | ▼ 4 | Sirius |
56.4% | 495 | 48 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 27 | – | Moe |
58.0% | 326 | 42 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 28 | ▼ 2 | Gus |
53.3% | 1766 | 67 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 29 | ▼ 1 | R-T |
56.1% | 392 | 45 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 30 | ▼ 1 | Piper |
51.0% | 13346 | 97 | 9.2% | Solid | ||
| 31 | – | Brock |
50.7% | 7412 | 88 | 5.3% | Solid | ||
| 32 | ▼ 2 | Doug |
56.4% | 289 | 40 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 33 | ▲ 5 | Lumi |
55.5% | 355 | 43 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 34 | – | Pearl |
52.7% | 919 | 57 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 35 | ▲ 1 | Mortis |
50.9% | 3359 | 77 | 2.2% | Solid | ||
| 36 | ▼ 5 | Lola |
54.9% | 377 | 44 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 37 | ▼ 3 | Belle |
51.2% | 2317 | 71 | 1.7% | Solid | ||
| 38 | ▼ 1 | Stu |
51.7% | 1021 | 59 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 39 | ▲ 5 | Chuck |
56.5% | 207 | 35 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 40 | ▲ 1 | Finx |
54.1% | 344 | 43 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 41 | ▼ 1 | Chester |
52.2% | 634 | 52 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 42 | – | Willow |
54.5% | 288 | 40 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 43 | ▼ 3 | Fang |
50.2% | 2223 | 70 | 1.6% | Solid | ||
| 44 | ▼ 2 | Byron |
48.9% | 5561 | 84 | 3.2% | Solid | ||
| 45 | ▲ 1 | Leon |
48.8% | 2209 | 70 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 46 | ▼ 1 | Lou |
50.2% | 629 | 52 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 47 | ▲ 2 | Juju |
54.1% | 159 | 31 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 48 | ▲ 1 | Max |
48.5% | 2029 | 69 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 49 | ▼ 2 | Squeak |
48.5% | 1892 | 68 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 50 | ▲ 3 | Alli |
51.0% | 337 | 42 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 51 | ▲ 1 | Janet |
49.9% | 477 | 47 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 52 | ▼ 3 | Bea |
47.5% | 3142 | 76 | 2.1% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | ▼ 2 | Colt |
46.5% | 7268 | 88 | 3.1% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | – | Damian |
50.0% | 230 | 37 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | – | Gene |
47.1% | 1432 | 64 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | ▲ 1 | Draco |
51.1% | 131 | 28 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | ▲ 1 | Bonnie |
47.3% | 766 | 55 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▲ 2 | Rico |
46.0% | 3068 | 75 | 2.1% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | ▼ 3 | Maisie |
47.0% | 660 | 52 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | ▼ 1 | Griff |
45.6% | 1735 | 67 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | ▲ 2 | Hank |
48.1% | 154 | 31 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▲ 3 | Spike |
45.2% | 1776 | 67 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▼ 1 | Tick |
44.5% | 3045 | 75 | 1.9% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▼ 3 | Kenji |
45.1% | 971 | 58 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▼ 1 | Mr. P |
44.7% | 836 | 56 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▲ 3 | Sam |
45.1% | 175 | 32 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▲ 1 | Trunk |
45.1% | 184 | 33 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▼ 2 | Crow |
43.4% | 2573 | 73 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▲ 9 | Charlie |
44.1% | 571 | 50 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▼ 3 | Penny |
43.7% | 1211 | 61 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▼ 1 | Jessie |
43.6% | 979 | 58 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▼ 1 | Buster |
43.7% | 300 | 41 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▲ 1 | Otis |
42.7% | 973 | 58 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▼ 2 | Poco |
42.5% | 1387 | 63 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▼ 2 | Shade |
42.7% | 316 | 41 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▼ 1 | Meg |
42.0% | 830 | 56 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▼ 1 | Surge |
41.8% | 1679 | 66 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▲ 3 | Buzz |
41.4% | 736 | 54 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▲ 1 | Edgar |
40.7% | 4640 | 81 | 3.3% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▲ 2 | Grom |
41.2% | 1156 | 61 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▼ 4 | Lily |
41.2% | 955 | 58 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▼ 3 | Tara |
40.7% | 639 | 52 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▲ 8 | Eve |
39.8% | 581 | 50 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▲ 1 | Gale |
39.8% | 646 | 52 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▼ 1 | Colette |
39.8% | 1315 | 63 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | – | Bibi |
39.4% | 753 | 54 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | – | Emz |
39.4% | 1972 | 69 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▼ 5 | Larry & Lawrie |
38.7% | 457 | 47 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▼ 1 | Barley |
38.7% | 788 | 55 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▼ 1 | Cordelius |
38.4% | 586 | 51 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▼ 1 | Pam |
37.6% | 402 | 45 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | – | Darryl |
37.6% | 707 | 53 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▲ 3 | Sandy |
36.4% | 500 | 48 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▼ 1 | Ash |
35.9% | 379 | 44 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▼ 1 | Ollie |
33.3% | 189 | 34 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▼ 1 | Frank |
36.8% | 927 | 57 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▲ 1 | Nita |
36.5% | 710 | 53 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▼ 1 | Dynamike |
36.6% | 1676 | 66 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | – | Rosa |
35.4% | 553 | 50 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▲ 2 | Clancy |
34.2% | 380 | 44 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | – | El Primo |
34.7% | 674 | 53 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▼ 2 | Berry |
34.1% | 492 | 48 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | ▲ 1 | Jacky |
33.5% | 555 | 50 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | ▼ 1 | Melodie |
33.4% | 617 | 51 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Bull |
31.8% | 713 | 53 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Shelly |
30.7% | 1157 | 61 | 0.7% | Rather not |