
Hot Zone
42,938 battles collected on this map.
TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 45 of 105 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 8,877 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 797 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 8,877 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 797 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (1,199 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Edgar |
62.1% | 6441 | 86 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Bibi |
62.0% | 4580 | 81 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Jessie |
60.9% | 5829 | 85 | 0.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | Emz |
60.3% | 6627 | 87 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | ▲ 1 | Kenji |
59.6% | 3177 | 76 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 6 | ▲ 1 | Berry |
59.0% | 3621 | 78 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 7 | ▼ 2 | Frank |
58.5% | 4648 | 82 | 1.0% | Good pick | ||
| 8 | – | Tick |
58.2% | 4656 | 82 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 9 | – | Sirius |
57.7% | 3360 | 77 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 10 | – | Hank |
57.8% | 2256 | 71 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 11 | – | Spike |
56.9% | 3699 | 78 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 12 | ▲ 2 | Doug |
56.9% | 3241 | 76 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 13 | ▼ 1 | Bo |
56.1% | 5136 | 83 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 14 | ▲ 1 | Juju |
57.1% | 1970 | 69 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | ▼ 2 | Griff |
56.4% | 3401 | 77 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 16 | – | Lou |
55.7% | 2803 | 74 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | ▲ 1 | Nita |
54.7% | 5316 | 84 | 1.1% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | ▼ 1 | Draco |
55.9% | 1714 | 67 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | – | Penny |
54.3% | 4804 | 82 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | ▲ 1 | Ash |
55.0% | 1762 | 67 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 21 | ▲ 2 | Larry & Lawrie |
54.3% | 2459 | 72 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 22 | ▼ 2 | Damian |
54.3% | 2213 | 70 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 23 | ▲ 2 | Surge |
53.5% | 3211 | 76 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 24 | – | Gale |
53.4% | 2630 | 73 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 25 | ▼ 3 | Crow |
53.0% | 3487 | 77 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 26 | ▲ 4 | Trunk |
53.2% | 1914 | 68 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 27 | ▼ 1 | Alli |
53.0% | 2108 | 70 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 28 | ▼ 1 | Fang |
52.7% | 2463 | 72 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 29 | ▲ 4 | Chuck |
52.6% | 2364 | 71 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 30 | ▼ 2 | Clancy |
53.1% | 1477 | 64 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 31 | ▼ 2 | Tara |
52.3% | 2378 | 71 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 32 | ▲ 2 | R-T |
52.6% | 1530 | 65 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 33 | ▼ 1 | Squeak |
51.6% | 2697 | 73 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 34 | ▼ 3 | Pam |
51.5% | 2877 | 74 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 35 | ▲ 1 | Nori |
52.3% | 1376 | 63 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 36 | ▼ 1 | Meg |
51.4% | 2451 | 72 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 37 | ▲ 2 | Finx |
51.6% | 1774 | 67 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 38 | ▲ 3 | Eve |
51.9% | 1429 | 64 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 39 | ▼ 1 | Pearl |
51.6% | 1584 | 65 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 40 | ▼ 3 | Mico |
51.1% | 2408 | 72 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 41 | ▼ 1 | Jacky |
50.4% | 3080 | 75 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 42 | – | Chester |
50.5% | 2719 | 73 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 43 | ▲ 1 | Shade |
49.7% | 3915 | 79 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 44 | ▼ 1 | Cordelius |
50.2% | 2046 | 69 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 45 | ▼ 1 | Jae-Yong |
50.6% | 877 | 57 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 46 | ▲ 1 | Mortis |
49.2% | 2727 | 74 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 47 | – | 8-Bit |
48.6% | 3567 | 78 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 48 | ▲ 3 | Moe |
50.0% | 932 | 57 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 49 | ▲ 5 | Starr Nova |
48.6% | 1965 | 69 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 50 | ▼ 4 | Wendy |
64.6% | 48 | 13 | 2.5% | Solid | ||
| 51 | – | Colette |
48.2% | 2880 | 74 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 52 | ▲ 5 | Sandy |
48.5% | 2100 | 70 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 53 | ▼ 1 | Gigi |
48.9% | 1134 | 60 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 54 | ▲ 6 | Glowy |
48.7% | 1272 | 62 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | ▲ 3 | Buzz |
48.0% | 2396 | 72 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | ▼ 3 | Dynamike |
47.4% | 5233 | 83 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | ▼ 8 | Lumi |
48.3% | 1533 | 65 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▲ 5 | Bull |
47.4% | 4586 | 81 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | ▲ 7 | Buster |
48.3% | 1401 | 64 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | ▼ 5 | Sprout |
48.1% | 1454 | 64 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | ▼ 4 | Ziggy |
48.3% | 1073 | 60 | 57.0% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▼ 1 | Darryl |
47.3% | 3052 | 75 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▼ 1 | Barley |
46.9% | 4851 | 82 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▲ 4 | Mina |
47.9% | 1305 | 63 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | – | Melodie |
48.0% | 1109 | 60 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▲ 3 | Carl |
47.1% | 2433 | 72 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▼ 8 | Amber |
47.1% | 2170 | 70 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▼ 1 | Kit |
47.0% | 2377 | 71 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▼ 5 | Ollie |
47.5% | 884 | 57 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▲ 1 | Charlie |
46.7% | 942 | 58 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▲ 2 | Pierce |
46.2% | 1279 | 62 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▼ 2 | Leon |
45.8% | 1968 | 69 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▲ 1 | Lola |
45.3% | 1427 | 64 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▼ 2 | Sam |
45.2% | 1398 | 64 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | – | Shelly |
44.4% | 5060 | 83 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▲ 4 | Poco |
44.2% | 4746 | 82 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▼ 1 | Lily |
44.8% | 1649 | 66 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▼ 1 | Otis |
45.0% | 1146 | 61 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▼ 1 | Maisie |
44.7% | 1614 | 66 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▲ 1 | El Primo |
43.9% | 4543 | 81 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▲ 1 | Kaze |
44.0% | 1797 | 67 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▼ 3 | Grom |
43.5% | 1835 | 68 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | – | Rico |
42.5% | 3372 | 77 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▲ 2 | Gray |
42.2% | 1448 | 64 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▼ 1 | Najia |
41.9% | 821 | 56 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▲ 1 | Ruffs |
41.7% | 1261 | 62 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▼ 2 | Meeple |
41.3% | 1385 | 63 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | – | Stu |
40.2% | 1903 | 68 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | – | Willow |
39.9% | 1738 | 67 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | – | Janet |
39.7% | 1027 | 59 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | – | Bonnie |
39.5% | 1219 | 61 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▲ 2 | Mr. P |
39.3% | 1474 | 64 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▼ 1 | Nani |
38.6% | 1457 | 64 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▼ 1 | Max |
38.6% | 1412 | 64 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▲ 1 | Rosa |
38.1% | 2725 | 74 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▼ 1 | Byron |
38.0% | 1280 | 62 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | – | Angelo |
36.2% | 1292 | 62 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | – | Gus |
36.2% | 1697 | 66 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▲ 1 | Bea |
35.3% | 1407 | 64 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▼ 1 | Mandy |
35.0% | 1491 | 64 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | – | Bolt |
33.1% | 777 | 55 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | – | Brock |
33.4% | 3202 | 76 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | – | Colt |
33.1% | 3507 | 77 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | ▲ 2 | Belle |
30.9% | 1019 | 59 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Piper |
30.6% | 1145 | 61 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | ▼ 2 | Gene |
29.7% | 1175 | 61 | 0.2% | Rather not |