Gem Grab

Double Swoosh

288,798 battles collected on this map.

TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 35 of 106 brawlers above 50%.

Recommendation

Controller 53680 games

Damage Dealer 12072 games

Damage Dealer 32593 games

Controller 78759 games

Damage Dealer 4305 games

Damage Dealer 24811 games

Controller 87534 games

Damage Dealer 2678 games

Damage Dealer 55301 games

Damage Dealer 4959 games

Assassin 128375 games

Damage Dealer 10224 games

Controller 12791 games

Damage Dealer 21804 games

Controller 7350 games

What the rating, star, trust and the tags mean

Strong pickThe rank on this map among all map/brawler rows of the mode (Gem Grab): Strong pick top tenth, Good pick top quarter, Solid upper half, Rather not the rest. The thresholds come from the field — the exact values are in the badge's tooltip. Not the tier list: that counts how many maps of the rotation a brawler is usable on. Rather not among the recommended eight therefore does not mean “bad”, but: this map has nothing better to offer.

TrustHow dependable the win rate next to it is, 0–100. Depends purely on the number of games — not on how good the brawler is.

Carry — becomes star player unusually often on this map: he deals the damage and takes the objective. The game runs through him.

Enabler — rarely becomes star player: he clears the way, heals, controls, and others do the scoring. This is no verdict on his strength — how good he is here is the win rate on the card. Measured across 1,620 map/brawler rows, enablers win on average 3.8 points less often than carries, but the star rate explains only 11% of the differences: there are plenty of strong enablers and weak carries. The star says how a brawler wins, not whether.

Hidden gems & traps

From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.

Underrated

Moe 56.5%Winrate 4,305 games

Trunk 54.5%Winrate 5,328 games

Draco 54.4%Winrate 3,822 games

R-T 54.7%Winrate 2,678 games

Overrated

Shelly 44.2%Winrate 27,798 games

Rico 42.5%Winrate 25,889 games

Spike 46.5%Winrate 25,435 games

Brock 39.5%Winrate 23,541 games

If you queue as three

The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.

Searched freely across 6,604 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 209 real line-ups.

66.5% expected

66.5% expected

66.5% expected

66.5% expected

66.5% expected

66.5% expected

How these numbers are arrived at

What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.

Best · on this map. All 6,604 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 209 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.

What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (554 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.

All brawlers on this map

Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.

#		Brawler	Win rate	Games	Trust	Pick rate	Rating
1	–	Bolt	67.0%	41019	100	2.4%	Strong pick
2	–	Ash	59.0%	11485	95	0.7%	Strong pick
3	–	Bo	58.1%	53680	100	3.1%	Strong pick
4	–	Wendy	57.0%	119235	100	6.9%	Strong pick
5	–	Clancy	57.6%	12072	96	0.7%	Strong pick
6	–	Starr Nova	57.1%	24748	100	1.4%	Strong pick
7	–	Tara	56.6%	32593	100	1.9%	Strong pick
8	–	Damian	56.9%	13687	98	0.8%	Strong pick
9	–	Doug	56.7%	15242	99	0.9%	Strong pick
10	–	Griff	55.7%	78759	100	4.5%	Strong pick
11	–	Moe	56.5%	4305	80	0.2%	Good pick
12	–	Chester	54.2%	24811	100	1.4%	Good pick
13	–	Rosa	53.9%	18891	100	1.1%	Good pick
14	–	Trunk	54.5%	5328	84	0.3%	Good pick
15	–	Emz	53.3%	87534	100	5.1%	Good pick
16	–	Draco	54.4%	3822	79	0.2%	Good pick
17	–	Bibi	53.1%	50092	100	2.9%	Good pick
18	–	R-T	54.7%	2678	73	0.2%	Good pick
19	–	Surge	52.8%	55301	100	3.2%	Good pick
20	–	Janet	53.9%	4545	81	0.3%	Good pick
21	–	Lumi	53.5%	4959	82	0.3%	Good pick
22	–	Mortis	51.8%	46600	100	2.7%	Good pick
23	–	Nori	51.8%	42828	100	2.5%	Good pick
24	–	Alli	52.4%	8117	90	0.5%	Good pick
25	–	Mina	52.5%	6520	87	0.4%	Solid
26	–	Crow	51.0%	51102	100	2.9%	Solid
27	–	Bull	51.1%	38626	100	2.2%	Solid
28	–	Jae-Yong	52.5%	1728	67	0.1%	Solid
29	–	Edgar	50.0%	128375	100	7.4%	Solid
30	–	Pearl	50.4%	10224	93	0.6%	Solid
31	–	Sandy	50.2%	12791	97	0.7%	Solid
32	–	Gigi	50.9%	3561	78	0.2%	Solid
33	–	Glowy	51.1%	2723	74	0.2%	Solid
34	–	Stu	50.0%	11092	95	0.6%	Solid
35	–	Meg	49.4%	22265	100	1.3%	Solid
36	–	Nita	49.3%	21804	100	1.3%	Solid
37	–	Amber	49.7%	7350	88	0.4%	Solid
38	–	Ruffs	50.3%	3064	75	0.2%	Solid
39	–	Kit	49.3%	11471	95	0.7%	Solid
40	▲ 1	Sirius	49.2%	11121	95	0.6%	Solid
41	▼ 1	Lily	49.0%	18414	100	1.1%	Solid
42	–	Finx	49.8%	2864	74	0.2%	Solid
43	–	Fang	48.6%	21978	100	1.3%	Solid
44	–	Kenji	48.6%	21777	100	1.3%	Solid
45	–	Otis	48.3%	11227	95	0.6%	Solid
46	–	Pierce	48.6%	4995	83	0.3%	Solid
47	–	Carl	47.8%	10249	93	0.6%	Solid
48	–	Meeple	47.8%	4955	82	0.3%	Solid
49	–	Jessie	47.1%	17440	100	1.0%	Solid
50	–	Mico	47.8%	4107	80	0.2%	Rather not
51	–	Kaze	47.5%	6711	87	0.4%	Rather not
52	–	Cordelius	46.6%	15382	99	0.9%	Rather not
53	–	Spike	46.5%	25435	100	1.5%	Rather not
54	–	Hank	47.5%	2815	74	0.2%	Rather not
55	–	Lola	46.9%	3172	76	0.2%	Rather not
56	–	Sam	46.9%	2777	74	0.2%	Rather not
57	–	Buster	46.5%	4277	80	0.2%	Rather not
58	–	Buzz	45.9%	14480	99	0.8%	Rather not
59	–	Ziggy	47.1%	1452	64	0.1%	Rather not
60	–	8-Bit	45.5%	20524	100	1.2%	Rather not
61	–	Charlie	46.0%	5371	84	0.3%	Rather not
62	–	Shade	45.7%	5787	85	0.3%	Rather not
63	–	Frank	45.2%	18891	100	1.1%	Rather not
64	–	Juju	46.6%	1415	64	0.1%	Rather not
65	–	Jacky	45.4%	8855	91	0.5%	Rather not
66	–	Leon	44.5%	21270	100	1.2%	Rather not
67	–	Max	44.6%	10575	94	0.6%	Rather not
68	–	Gray	45.1%	3438	77	0.2%	Rather not
69	–	Tick	44.3%	20375	100	1.2%	Rather not
70	–	Shelly	44.2%	27798	100	1.6%	Rather not
71	–	Najia	45.0%	2837	74	0.2%	Rather not
72	–	Sprout	44.5%	2336	71	0.1%	Rather not
73	–	Gale	43.7%	9887	93	0.6%	Rather not
74	–	Poco	43.1%	16618	100	1.0%	Rather not
75	–	Rico	42.5%	25889	100	1.5%	Rather not
76	–	Pam	42.8%	5762	85	0.3%	Rather not
77	–	Ollie	43.0%	2067	69	0.1%	Rather not
78	–	Chuck	42.8%	2493	72	0.1%	Rather not
79	–	Lou	42.3%	6352	86	0.4%	Rather not
80	–	Darryl	41.9%	11384	95	0.7%	Rather not
81	–	Mr. P	42.1%	4435	81	0.3%	Rather not
82	–	Penny	41.0%	10500	94	0.6%	Rather not
83	–	Mandy	41.0%	5537	84	0.3%	Rather not
84	–	Colette	39.9%	15166	99	0.9%	Rather not
85	–	Nani	40.2%	3821	79	0.2%	Rather not
86	–	Maisie	40.1%	4952	82	0.3%	Rather not
87	–	Brock	39.5%	23541	100	1.4%	Rather not
88	–	Gus	39.7%	3989	79	0.2%	Rather not
89	–	Squeak	39.2%	12159	96	0.7%	Rather not
90	–	Larry & Lawrie	39.3%	3830	79	0.2%	Rather not
91	–	Dynamike	38.7%	18395	100	1.1%	Rather not
92	–	Gene	37.9%	5996	85	0.3%	Rather not
93	–	Eve	38.1%	2936	75	0.2%	Rather not
94	–	Colt	36.9%	21243	100	1.2%	Rather not
95	–	Willow	37.4%	2389	72	0.1%	Rather not
96	–	Melodie	37.2%	3513	77	0.2%	Rather not
97	–	El Primo	36.6%	12489	96	0.7%	Rather not
98	–	Angelo	36.1%	1446	64	0.1%	Rather not
99	–	Byron	35.8%	8389	90	0.5%	Rather not
100	–	Bea	33.9%	5791	85	0.3%	Rather not
101	–	Berry	33.8%	5578	84	0.3%	Rather not
102	–	Belle	32.0%	4031	79	0.2%	Rather not
103	–	Piper	31.6%	7161	88	0.4%	Rather not
104	–	Bonnie	31.4%	3019	75	0.2%	Rather not
105	–	Barley	29.8%	6718	87	0.4%	Rather not
106	–	Grom	29.7%	5186	83	0.3%	Rather not