
Bounty
141,244 battles collected on this map.
TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 26 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 7,716 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 232 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 7,716 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 232 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (71 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Bolt |
67.8% | 8580 | 91 | 1.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Wendy |
59.1% | 119585 | 100 | 14.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Brock |
55.7% | 67642 | 100 | 8.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | Tick |
55.7% | 29611 | 100 | 3.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | – | Bo |
55.1% | 13201 | 97 | 1.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | – | Najia |
54.2% | 11928 | 96 | 1.4% | Good pick | ||
| 7 | – | Mina |
54.9% | 2772 | 74 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 8 | – | Mr. P |
54.6% | 2578 | 73 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 9 | – | Meeple |
53.6% | 6719 | 87 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 10 | – | Mortis |
52.9% | 14261 | 98 | 1.7% | Good pick | ||
| 11 | – | Carl |
53.2% | 4964 | 82 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 12 | – | Pierce |
52.2% | 17410 | 100 | 2.1% | Good pick | ||
| 13 | ▲ 1 | Mandy |
51.8% | 21692 | 100 | 2.6% | Good pick | ||
| 14 | ▼ 1 | Grom |
52.0% | 8914 | 91 | 1.1% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | – | Starr Nova |
51.9% | 7258 | 88 | 0.9% | Good pick | ||
| 16 | – | Mico |
52.7% | 2104 | 70 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 17 | – | Gray |
51.6% | 5705 | 85 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 18 | – | 8-Bit |
51.1% | 12351 | 96 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 19 | – | Pearl |
52.0% | 2809 | 74 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 20 | ▲ 2 | Piper |
50.1% | 43791 | 100 | 5.2% | Solid | ||
| 21 | ▼ 1 | Belle |
50.7% | 7253 | 88 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 22 | ▼ 1 | Byron |
50.2% | 22743 | 100 | 2.7% | Solid | ||
| 23 | ▲ 1 | Sprout |
51.6% | 1948 | 68 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 24 | ▼ 1 | Edgar |
49.7% | 69540 | 100 | 8.2% | Solid | ||
| 25 | – | Penny |
49.9% | 6923 | 87 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 26 | ▲ 2 | Ruffs |
51.4% | 947 | 58 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 27 | ▼ 1 | Gus |
49.4% | 5860 | 85 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 28 | ▼ 1 | Nori |
48.4% | 29405 | 100 | 3.5% | Solid | ||
| 29 | ▲ 1 | Gigi |
50.7% | 1007 | 59 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 30 | ▲ 2 | Angelo |
49.9% | 1866 | 68 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 31 | ▼ 2 | Leon |
48.4% | 12611 | 96 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 32 | ▼ 1 | Squeak |
48.4% | 12110 | 96 | 1.4% | Solid | ||
| 33 | ▲ 1 | Kit |
48.7% | 5156 | 83 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 34 | ▼ 1 | Stu |
48.8% | 4264 | 80 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 35 | ▲ 1 | R-T |
50.1% | 733 | 54 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 36 | ▲ 2 | Kaze |
48.5% | 1977 | 69 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 37 | ▼ 2 | Nani |
47.6% | 5995 | 85 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 38 | ▼ 1 | Griff |
46.8% | 16662 | 100 | 2.0% | Rather not | ||
| 39 | – | Fang |
46.8% | 9212 | 92 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 40 | ▲ 5 | Janet |
48.2% | 965 | 58 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 41 | – | Lily |
46.8% | 4459 | 81 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 42 | ▲ 2 | Max |
46.8% | 4639 | 81 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 43 | ▲ 1 | Damian |
47.8% | 1280 | 62 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 44 | ▼ 3 | Surge |
46.1% | 10567 | 94 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 45 | – | Otis |
46.5% | 4607 | 81 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 46 | ▼ 4 | Bea |
46.1% | 9852 | 93 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 47 | ▼ 1 | Spike |
45.8% | 14697 | 99 | 1.7% | Rather not | ||
| 48 | – | Gene |
45.9% | 2735 | 74 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 49 | – | Doug |
46.4% | 963 | 58 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 50 | ▲ 3 | Colt |
44.0% | 22456 | 100 | 2.6% | Rather not | ||
| 51 | – | Emz |
43.9% | 17357 | 100 | 2.0% | Rather not | ||
| 52 | ▲ 2 | Sirius |
44.3% | 3868 | 79 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | ▼ 2 | Eve |
45.1% | 983 | 58 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | ▲ 2 | Rico |
43.6% | 14583 | 99 | 1.7% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | ▼ 5 | Ash |
45.4% | 566 | 50 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | – | Bonnie |
44.2% | 1464 | 64 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | ▲ 2 | Chester |
43.6% | 3195 | 76 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▼ 1 | Ziggy |
44.4% | 782 | 55 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | ▼ 1 | Crow |
42.6% | 17748 | 100 | 2.1% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | – | Glowy |
44.1% | 680 | 53 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | – | Lumi |
43.6% | 1077 | 60 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▲ 1 | Juju |
43.5% | 345 | 43 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▼ 1 | Jessie |
41.9% | 5188 | 83 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▲ 5 | Chuck |
42.5% | 315 | 41 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▲ 1 | Moe |
42.3% | 560 | 50 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▼ 2 | Dynamike |
41.3% | 8206 | 90 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▼ 3 | Jae-Yong |
41.8% | 311 | 41 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | – | Finx |
41.9% | 726 | 54 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▼ 1 | Bibi |
40.6% | 4902 | 82 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | – | Amber |
40.4% | 1886 | 68 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | – | Maisie |
40.3% | 2183 | 70 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▲ 2 | Willow |
40.2% | 756 | 54 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | – | Lola |
40.2% | 824 | 56 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▼ 2 | Buzz |
39.7% | 2742 | 74 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▲ 2 | Buster |
37.2% | 234 | 37 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▼ 1 | Larry & Lawrie |
38.6% | 972 | 58 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▼ 1 | Poco |
38.4% | 2823 | 74 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | – | Ollie |
35.6% | 205 | 35 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | – | Gale |
37.2% | 2432 | 72 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▲ 1 | Sam |
35.4% | 302 | 41 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▼ 1 | Draco |
35.1% | 271 | 39 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | – | Colette |
36.7% | 6915 | 87 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▲ 2 | Frank |
36.5% | 4317 | 80 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▼ 1 | Lou |
36.5% | 2044 | 69 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▼ 1 | Kenji |
36.4% | 4219 | 80 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▲ 1 | Cordelius |
35.6% | 1843 | 68 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▼ 1 | Darryl |
35.4% | 2307 | 71 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▲ 1 | Alli |
33.8% | 470 | 47 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▲ 5 | Shade |
34.7% | 1036 | 59 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▼ 2 | Tara |
34.6% | 2376 | 71 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▲ 4 | Trunk |
33.1% | 456 | 47 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▼ 1 | Hank |
32.4% | 373 | 44 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▼ 1 | Nita |
34.4% | 2579 | 73 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▼ 1 | Sandy |
34.1% | 1379 | 63 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▼ 5 | Charlie |
34.1% | 1342 | 63 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | – | Meg |
33.6% | 2928 | 75 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▲ 1 | Pam |
31.8% | 592 | 51 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▲ 2 | Bull |
33.0% | 2876 | 74 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | – | Clancy |
32.4% | 975 | 58 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▼ 3 | Melodie |
31.5% | 803 | 55 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | – | Jacky |
30.9% | 1040 | 59 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | – | Shelly |
30.7% | 4132 | 80 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | – | El Primo |
28.9% | 2567 | 73 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | – | Rosa |
26.1% | 832 | 56 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Barley |
26.3% | 1622 | 66 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Berry |
23.6% | 1734 | 67 | 0.2% | Rather not |