
Bounty
142,192 battles collected on this map.
TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 26 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 9,259 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 331 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 9,259 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 331 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (153 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Bolt |
67.8% | 8636 | 91 | 0.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Wendy |
59.1% | 120508 | 100 | 10.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Brock |
55.7% | 67968 | 100 | 4.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | Tick |
55.7% | 29754 | 100 | 2.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | – | Bo |
55.1% | 13283 | 97 | 1.0% | Good pick | ||
| 6 | – | Najia |
54.2% | 11996 | 96 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 7 | ▲ 1 | Mina |
54.8% | 2789 | 74 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 8 | ▼ 1 | Mr. P |
54.8% | 2586 | 73 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 9 | – | Meeple |
53.6% | 6744 | 87 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 10 | – | Mortis |
52.9% | 14361 | 98 | 1.5% | Good pick | ||
| 11 | – | Carl |
53.3% | 4971 | 83 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 12 | – | Pierce |
52.1% | 17533 | 100 | 1.5% | Good pick | ||
| 13 | ▲ 1 | Mandy |
51.8% | 21783 | 100 | 1.2% | Good pick | ||
| 14 | ▼ 1 | Grom |
52.0% | 8955 | 91 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 15 | – | Starr Nova |
51.8% | 7336 | 88 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 16 | ▲ 2 | Mico |
52.7% | 2112 | 70 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 17 | – | Gray |
51.6% | 5733 | 85 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 18 | ▼ 2 | 8-Bit |
51.1% | 12495 | 96 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 19 | ▲ 1 | Pearl |
51.8% | 2829 | 74 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 20 | ▼ 1 | Belle |
50.8% | 7298 | 88 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 21 | ▲ 1 | Piper |
50.1% | 44051 | 100 | 3.3% | Solid | ||
| 22 | ▼ 1 | Byron |
50.1% | 22900 | 100 | 1.8% | Solid | ||
| 23 | – | Edgar |
49.7% | 70237 | 100 | 8.0% | Solid | ||
| 24 | – | Sprout |
51.5% | 1948 | 68 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 25 | – | Penny |
50.0% | 6956 | 88 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 26 | ▲ 2 | Ruffs |
51.4% | 941 | 58 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 27 | ▼ 1 | Gus |
49.3% | 5891 | 85 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 28 | ▼ 1 | Nori |
48.4% | 29603 | 100 | 2.3% | Solid | ||
| 29 | ▲ 1 | Gigi |
50.7% | 1011 | 59 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 30 | ▲ 2 | Angelo |
49.8% | 1876 | 68 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 31 | ▼ 2 | Leon |
48.4% | 12700 | 97 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 32 | ▼ 1 | Squeak |
48.4% | 12152 | 96 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 33 | – | Stu |
48.8% | 4305 | 80 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 34 | – | Kit |
48.7% | 5143 | 83 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 35 | ▲ 1 | Kaze |
48.6% | 1975 | 69 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 36 | ▲ 2 | R-T |
49.7% | 738 | 54 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 37 | ▼ 2 | Nani |
47.5% | 6015 | 85 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 38 | ▼ 1 | Griff |
46.7% | 16790 | 100 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 39 | – | Fang |
46.8% | 9283 | 92 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 40 | – | Lily |
47.0% | 4490 | 81 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 41 | – | Max |
46.9% | 4696 | 82 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 42 | ▲ 4 | Janet |
47.8% | 968 | 58 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 43 | – | Surge |
46.1% | 10647 | 94 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 44 | ▲ 1 | Damian |
47.5% | 1289 | 62 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 45 | ▼ 1 | Bea |
46.1% | 9875 | 93 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 46 | ▼ 2 | Spike |
45.8% | 14789 | 99 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 47 | ▼ 2 | Otis |
46.3% | 4646 | 82 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 48 | – | Gene |
45.7% | 2756 | 74 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 49 | – | Doug |
46.5% | 969 | 58 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 50 | ▲ 2 | Colt |
44.0% | 22582 | 100 | 1.7% | Rather not | ||
| 51 | – | Emz |
43.9% | 17510 | 100 | 1.8% | Rather not | ||
| 52 | ▲ 1 | Sirius |
44.4% | 3888 | 79 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | ▼ 4 | Eve |
45.1% | 980 | 58 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | ▲ 2 | Rico |
43.6% | 14679 | 99 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | ▼ 1 | Ash |
45.3% | 569 | 50 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | – | Bonnie |
44.2% | 1458 | 64 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | ▲ 2 | Chester |
43.6% | 3220 | 76 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▲ 2 | Glowy |
44.3% | 684 | 53 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | ▼ 2 | Ziggy |
44.1% | 782 | 55 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | ▼ 2 | Crow |
42.6% | 17860 | 100 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | – | Lumi |
43.7% | 1089 | 60 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | – | Juju |
43.1% | 348 | 43 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | – | Jessie |
42.0% | 5215 | 83 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▲ 1 | Moe |
42.4% | 564 | 50 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▲ 5 | Chuck |
42.2% | 315 | 41 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▼ 2 | Dynamike |
41.2% | 8242 | 90 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | – | Finx |
42.0% | 729 | 54 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▼ 2 | Jae-Yong |
41.6% | 310 | 41 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▼ 1 | Bibi |
40.6% | 4930 | 82 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▲ 1 | Lola |
40.6% | 833 | 56 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▼ 2 | Amber |
40.4% | 1887 | 68 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | – | Maisie |
40.3% | 2196 | 70 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▲ 1 | Willow |
40.1% | 755 | 54 | 10.6% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▼ 1 | Buzz |
39.7% | 2758 | 74 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▲ 2 | Buster |
37.4% | 230 | 37 | 3.2% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▼ 1 | Larry & Lawrie |
38.6% | 976 | 58 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▼ 1 | Poco |
38.4% | 2823 | 74 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | – | Ollie |
35.8% | 201 | 35 | 2.8% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | – | Gale |
37.2% | 2439 | 72 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | – | Colette |
36.9% | 6965 | 88 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | – | Draco |
35.1% | 271 | 39 | 3.8% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▲ 1 | Sam |
35.3% | 306 | 41 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▼ 1 | Lou |
36.8% | 2062 | 69 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▲ 1 | Frank |
36.5% | 4345 | 80 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▼ 1 | Kenji |
36.4% | 4269 | 80 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▲ 1 | Cordelius |
35.6% | 1863 | 68 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▼ 1 | Darryl |
35.6% | 2333 | 71 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▲ 2 | Alli |
33.6% | 470 | 47 | 6.6% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▲ 5 | Shade |
34.7% | 1056 | 59 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▼ 2 | Tara |
34.7% | 2399 | 72 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▲ 2 | Trunk |
33.2% | 464 | 47 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▼ 3 | Sandy |
34.3% | 1383 | 63 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▼ 1 | Nita |
34.3% | 2595 | 73 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▼ 3 | Charlie |
33.9% | 1360 | 63 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | – | Hank |
31.6% | 370 | 44 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | – | Meg |
33.7% | 2954 | 75 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▲ 3 | Bull |
33.0% | 2890 | 74 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | – | Pam |
31.6% | 594 | 51 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | – | Clancy |
32.4% | 987 | 58 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▼ 3 | Melodie |
31.9% | 809 | 55 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | – | Jacky |
30.9% | 1045 | 59 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | – | Shelly |
30.8% | 4185 | 80 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | – | El Primo |
28.8% | 2601 | 73 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | – | Rosa |
25.9% | 835 | 56 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Barley |
26.2% | 1631 | 66 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Berry |
23.4% | 1749 | 67 | 0.2% | Rather not |