My roster

Enter your player tag and the site hides everything you cannot play anyway: brawlers you are missing, and those below power 9 — below 11 from Mythic upwards. The tag goes to the official API once and then stays in your browser. It is neither stored nor logged here, and there is no account.

You can find your tag in the game, under your name in your profile.

EN
Knockout

Flowing Springs

39,540 battles collected on this map.

TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 45 of 105 brawlers above 50%.

Trophy Road
Flowing SpringsKnockout

Recommendation

What the rating, star, trust and the tags mean
Strong pick Good pick SolidThe rank on this map among all map/brawler rows of the mode (Knockout): Strong pick top tenth, Good pick top quarter, Solid upper half, Rather not the rest. The thresholds come from the field — the exact values are in the badge's tooltip. Not the tier list: that counts how many maps of the rotation a brawler is usable on. Rather not among the recommended eight therefore does not mean “bad”, but: this map has nothing better to offer.
TrustHow dependable the win rate next to it is, 0–100. Depends purely on the number of games — not on how good the brawler is.
Carry — becomes star player unusually often on this map: he deals the damage and takes the objective. The game runs through him.

Hidden gems & traps

From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.

If you queue as three

The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.

Searched freely across 9,562 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 1,394 real line-ups.

1
78.6% expected
2
78.5% expected
3
78.5% expected
4
78.5% expected
5
78.4% expected
6
78.4% expected
How these numbers are arrived at

What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.

Best · on this map. All 9,562 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 1,394 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.

What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (389 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.

All brawlers on this map

Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.

#BrawlerWin rateGamesTrustPick rateRating
1 Spike 62.9%
2878 74
1.2% Strong pick
2 Eve 61.8%
1994 69
0.8% Strong pick
3 Piper 59.8%
7244 88
3.1% Good pick
4 Juju 60.3%
1520 65
0.6% Good pick
5 Nani 58.6%
4040 79
1.7% Good pick
6 Squeak 59.1%
1919 68
0.8% Good pick
7 Brock 56.1%
7178 88
3.0% Solid
8▲ 2 Edgar 56.0%
7219 88
3.0% Solid
9▼ 1 Belle 56.8%
2942 75
1.2% Solid
10▲ 2 Mandy 56.0%
6200 86
2.6% Solid
11▼ 2 Byron 56.1%
4651 82
2.0% Solid
12▼ 1 Pierce 56.2%
3065 75
1.3% Solid
13 Jae-Yong 57.5%
1127 60
0.5% Solid
14▲ 1 Bonnie 56.3%
2092 70
0.9% Solid
15▲ 1 Angelo 55.2%
4125 80
1.7% Solid
16▼ 2 Janet 56.2%
1373 63
0.6% Solid
17▲ 1 Najia 55.1%
2573 73
1.1% Solid
18▲ 1 Sirius 54.9%
2286 71
1.0% Solid
19▼ 2 Tick 54.9%
2007 69
0.8% Solid
20▲ 3 Sprout 55.4%
1332 63
0.6% Solid
21▼ 1 Bea 53.7%
3693 78
1.6% Solid
22 Mr. P 54.3%
1627 66
0.7% Solid
23▲ 2 Mico 53.2%
2681 73
1.1% Solid
24 8-Bit 53.0%
3199 76
1.3% Solid
25▼ 4 Alli 53.3%
2298 71
1.0% Solid
26 Grom 53.3%
1801 67
0.8% Solid
27 Leon 51.5%
4659 82
2.0% Rather not
28▲ 7 Charlie 52.4%
1304 62
0.5% Rather not
29▲ 1 Pearl 52.1%
1442 64
0.6% Rather not
30▲ 1 Colette 51.0%
3580 78
1.5% Rather not
31▲ 1 Otis 51.6%
1851 68
0.8% Rather not
32▲ 4 Moe 52.7%
892 57
0.4% Rather not
33▼ 3 Crow 50.8%
4167 80
1.8% Rather not
34▼ 1 R-T 51.8%
1571 65
0.7% Rather not
35▲ 3 Gus 50.4%
3902 79
1.6% Rather not
36 Rico 50.1%
4765 82
2.0% Rather not
37▼ 3 Fang 50.5%
2567 73
1.1% Rather not
38▼ 10 Emz 50.6%
1756 67
0.7% Rather not
39▲ 2 Bo 50.4%
1837 68
0.8% Rather not
40▼ 1 Carl 50.1%
2284 71
1.0% Rather not
41▼ 1 Kit 49.6%
3974 79
1.7% Rather not
42▲ 9 Ruffs 50.6%
1314 63
0.6% Rather not
43▲ 6 Lola 50.2%
1566 65
0.7% Rather not
44▲ 3 Finx 50.4%
1254 62
0.5% Rather not
45▲ 3 Gray 49.7%
2341 71
1.0% Rather not
46▼ 2 Colt 48.7%
7114 88
3.0% Rather not
47▼ 2 Buster 50.6%
884 57
0.4% Rather not
48▼ 5 Larry & Lawrie 50.0%
1259 62
0.5% Rather not
49▼ 7 Griff 49.4%
2117 70
0.9% Rather not
50▲ 3 Jessie 49.2%
2155 70
0.9% Rather not
51▼ 1 Maisie 49.2%
2010 69
0.8% Rather not
52▲ 5 Lumi 49.7%
994 58
0.4% Rather not
53▲ 2 Meeple 48.9%
1712 67
0.7% Rather not
54▼ 8 Glowy 49.1%
1158 61
0.5% Rather not
55▼ 1 Amber 49.0%
1334 63
0.6% Rather not
56▼ 4 Lily 48.2%
2677 73
1.1% Rather not
57▼ 1 Ziggy 49.4%
761 54
0.3% Rather not
58 Bibi 47.5%
1954 69
0.8% Rather not
59▲ 3 Darryl 47.1%
2462 72
1.0% Rather not
60▼ 1 Tara 47.4%
1566 65
0.7% Rather not
61▲ 4 Nori 47.1%
1869 68
0.8% Rather not
62▲ 1 Kenji 47.0%
1633 66
0.7% Rather not
63▲ 3 Gigi 47.6%
797 55
0.3% Rather not
64▲ 6 Berry 47.2%
1051 59
0.4% Rather not
65▲ 4 Penny 46.6%
1790 67
0.8% Rather not
66▲ 1 Pam 46.8%
1456 64
0.6% Rather not
67▼ 3 Gale 46.7%
1408 64
0.6% Rather not
68▲ 8 Buzz 46.4%
2012 69
0.8% Rather not
69▲ 2 Surge 46.2%
2191 70
0.9% Rather not
70▼ 9 Lou 46.8%
1124 60
0.5% Rather not
71▼ 3 Cordelius 46.2%
2095 70
0.9% Rather not
72▼ 12 Willow 46.7%
1213 61
0.5% Rather not
73 Starr Nova 46.2%
1714 67
0.7% Rather not
74 Gene 45.9%
2323 71
1.0% Rather not
75▲ 2 Mina 46.3%
1154 61
0.5% Rather not
76▼ 4 Max 45.7%
2157 70
0.9% Rather not
77▼ 2 Chester 45.6%
2400 72
1.0% Rather not
78▲ 1 Frank 45.6%
1865 68
0.8% Rather not
79▲ 2 Mortis 45.0%
3125 76
1.3% Rather not
80▲ 3 Meg 45.5%
1337 63
0.6% Rather not
81▲ 3 Melodie 45.0%
1261 62
0.5% Rather not
82▼ 1 Dynamike 44.6%
2280 71
1.0% Rather not
83▼ 5 Clancy 45.1%
887 57
0.4% Rather not
84▼ 2 Shade 44.2%
2193 70
0.9% Rather not
85▲ 1 Ollie 44.8%
770 55
0.3% Rather not
86▲ 1 Stu 43.9%
2758 74
1.2% Rather not
87▲ 1 Sam 43.9%
1146 61
0.5% Rather not
88▲ 3 Draco 44.0%
804 55
0.3% Rather not
89▼ 5 Bolt 43.8%
875 57
0.4% Rather not
90 Shelly 42.7%
4530 81
1.9% Rather not
91▼ 2 Hank 43.4%
1003 59
0.4% Rather not
92 Sandy 41.9%
885 57
0.4% Rather not
93 Doug 41.5%
1252 62
0.5% Rather not
94 Ash 41.2%
992 58
0.4% Rather not
95 Kaze 40.8%
1747 67
0.7% Rather not
96 Damian 40.9%
773 55
0.3% Rather not
97 Chuck 40.3%
904 57
0.4% Rather not
98 Nita 39.5%
2722 74
1.1% Rather not
99▲ 2 Trunk 38.4%
851 56
0.4% Rather not
100▼ 1 Poco 38.1%
2744 74
1.2% Rather not
101▲ 1 Bull 37.0%
3258 76
1.4% Rather not
102▼ 2 Jacky 36.3%
1283 62
0.5% Rather not
103 El Primo 35.4%
2661 73
1.1% Rather not
104 Barley 34.4%
1967 69
0.8% Rather not
105 Rosa 28.3%
1733 67
0.7% Rather not