
Knockout
39,564 battles collected on this map.
TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 45 of 105 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 9,769 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 2,115 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 9,769 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 2,115 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (225 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Spike |
62.9% | 2883 | 74 | 0.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Eve |
61.8% | 1994 | 69 | 2.5% | Good pick | ||
| 3 | – | Piper |
59.8% | 7250 | 88 | 0.0% | Good pick | ||
| 4 | – | Juju |
60.2% | 1521 | 65 | 0.0% | Good pick | ||
| 5 | – | Nani |
58.6% | 4040 | 79 | 5.1% | Good pick | ||
| 6 | – | Squeak |
59.1% | 1920 | 68 | 2.4% | Good pick | ||
| 7 | – | Brock |
56.1% | 7181 | 88 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 8 | – | Belle |
56.9% | 2946 | 75 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 9 | ▲ 1 | Edgar |
56.0% | 7224 | 88 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 10 | ▲ 3 | Mandy |
55.9% | 6204 | 86 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 11 | ▼ 2 | Byron |
56.1% | 4651 | 82 | 5.9% | Solid | ||
| 12 | ▼ 1 | Pierce |
56.2% | 3066 | 75 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 13 | ▼ 1 | Jae-Yong |
57.5% | 1127 | 60 | 1.4% | Solid | ||
| 14 | ▲ 1 | Bonnie |
56.3% | 2095 | 70 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 15 | ▲ 1 | Angelo |
55.3% | 4127 | 80 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 16 | ▼ 2 | Janet |
56.2% | 1373 | 63 | 1.7% | Solid | ||
| 17 | ▲ 1 | Najia |
55.1% | 2574 | 73 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 18 | ▲ 1 | Sirius |
54.9% | 2286 | 71 | 2.9% | Solid | ||
| 19 | ▼ 2 | Tick |
54.9% | 2011 | 69 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 20 | ▲ 3 | Sprout |
55.4% | 1334 | 63 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 21 | ▼ 1 | Bea |
53.7% | 3699 | 78 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 22 | – | Mr. P |
54.3% | 1627 | 66 | 2.1% | Solid | ||
| 23 | ▲ 2 | Mico |
53.2% | 2682 | 73 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 24 | – | 8-Bit |
53.0% | 3200 | 76 | 4.0% | Rather not | ||
| 25 | ▼ 4 | Alli |
53.3% | 2298 | 71 | 2.9% | Rather not | ||
| 26 | – | Grom |
53.3% | 1801 | 67 | 2.3% | Rather not | ||
| 27 | – | Leon |
51.5% | 4661 | 82 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 28 | ▲ 7 | Charlie |
52.4% | 1304 | 62 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 29 | ▲ 1 | Pearl |
52.1% | 1445 | 64 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 30 | ▲ 1 | Colette |
51.0% | 3586 | 78 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 31 | ▼ 2 | Crow |
50.8% | 4171 | 80 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 32 | – | Otis |
51.6% | 1851 | 68 | 2.3% | Rather not | ||
| 33 | – | R-T |
51.8% | 1572 | 65 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 34 | ▲ 3 | Moe |
52.7% | 892 | 57 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 35 | ▲ 3 | Gus |
50.4% | 3906 | 79 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 36 | – | Rico |
50.2% | 4768 | 82 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 37 | ▼ 3 | Fang |
50.5% | 2570 | 73 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 38 | ▼ 10 | Emz |
50.6% | 1756 | 67 | 2.2% | Rather not | ||
| 39 | ▲ 2 | Bo |
50.3% | 1840 | 68 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 40 | ▼ 1 | Carl |
50.1% | 2284 | 71 | 2.9% | Rather not | ||
| 41 | ▼ 1 | Kit |
49.6% | 3975 | 79 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 42 | ▲ 9 | Ruffs |
50.6% | 1315 | 63 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 43 | ▲ 6 | Lola |
50.2% | 1566 | 65 | 2.0% | Rather not | ||
| 44 | ▲ 4 | Finx |
50.4% | 1254 | 62 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 45 | ▲ 2 | Gray |
49.7% | 2344 | 71 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 46 | ▼ 2 | Colt |
48.6% | 7119 | 88 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 47 | ▼ 4 | Larry & Lawrie |
50.1% | 1260 | 62 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 48 | ▼ 6 | Griff |
49.4% | 2118 | 70 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 49 | ▼ 4 | Buster |
50.5% | 885 | 57 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 50 | ▲ 3 | Jessie |
49.2% | 2157 | 70 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 51 | ▼ 1 | Maisie |
49.2% | 2010 | 69 | 2.5% | Rather not | ||
| 52 | ▲ 5 | Lumi |
49.7% | 994 | 58 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | ▲ 2 | Meeple |
48.9% | 1712 | 67 | 2.2% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | ▼ 8 | Glowy |
49.1% | 1158 | 61 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | ▼ 2 | Amber |
48.9% | 1335 | 63 | 1.7% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | ▼ 3 | Lily |
48.2% | 2679 | 73 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | ▼ 1 | Ziggy |
49.4% | 761 | 54 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | – | Bibi |
47.5% | 1955 | 69 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | ▲ 3 | Darryl |
47.1% | 2462 | 72 | 3.1% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | – | Tara |
47.4% | 1567 | 65 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | ▲ 5 | Nori |
47.1% | 1870 | 68 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▲ 1 | Kenji |
47.0% | 1634 | 66 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▲ 2 | Gigi |
47.7% | 799 | 55 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▲ 6 | Berry |
47.2% | 1051 | 59 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▲ 4 | Penny |
46.7% | 1792 | 67 | 2.3% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▲ 1 | Pam |
46.8% | 1457 | 64 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▼ 3 | Gale |
46.7% | 1409 | 64 | 1.8% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▲ 8 | Buzz |
46.4% | 2012 | 69 | 2.5% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▼ 10 | Willow |
46.7% | 1215 | 61 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▲ 1 | Surge |
46.2% | 2191 | 70 | 2.8% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▼ 10 | Lou |
46.8% | 1124 | 60 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▼ 4 | Cordelius |
46.2% | 2097 | 70 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▲ 1 | Starr Nova |
46.2% | 1715 | 67 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▲ 1 | Gene |
45.9% | 2325 | 71 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▲ 2 | Mina |
46.3% | 1154 | 61 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▼ 4 | Max |
45.7% | 2157 | 70 | 2.7% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▼ 4 | Chester |
45.6% | 2400 | 72 | 3.0% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▲ 2 | Frank |
45.6% | 1867 | 68 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▲ 2 | Mortis |
45.0% | 3128 | 76 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▲ 4 | Meg |
45.4% | 1338 | 63 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▲ 4 | Melodie |
45.0% | 1264 | 62 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▼ 3 | Dynamike |
44.6% | 2281 | 71 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▼ 5 | Clancy |
45.2% | 888 | 57 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▼ 2 | Shade |
44.2% | 2194 | 70 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▲ 1 | Ollie |
44.8% | 770 | 55 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▲ 1 | Stu |
43.9% | 2758 | 74 | 3.5% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▲ 1 | Sam |
43.9% | 1147 | 61 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▲ 3 | Draco |
44.0% | 804 | 55 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▼ 6 | Bolt |
43.8% | 876 | 57 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | – | Shelly |
42.7% | 4534 | 81 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▼ 2 | Hank |
43.3% | 1004 | 59 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | – | Sandy |
41.9% | 885 | 57 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | – | Doug |
41.5% | 1252 | 62 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | – | Ash |
41.2% | 992 | 58 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | – | Kaze |
40.8% | 1747 | 67 | 2.2% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | – | Damian |
40.8% | 774 | 55 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | – | Chuck |
40.2% | 906 | 57 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | – | Nita |
39.5% | 2723 | 74 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▲ 2 | Trunk |
38.4% | 851 | 56 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▼ 1 | Poco |
38.1% | 2746 | 74 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▲ 1 | Bull |
37.0% | 3259 | 76 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▼ 2 | Jacky |
36.3% | 1285 | 62 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | – | El Primo |
35.4% | 2663 | 73 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | – | Barley |
34.4% | 1967 | 69 | 2.5% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Rosa |
28.3% | 1733 | 67 | 2.2% | Rather not |