
Duo Showdown
12,657 battles collected on this map.
OPEN — more choice than on most maps: 59 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
Showdown has no win or loss — the API only reports the placement. The percentage here says how often the battle ended with a trophy gain (place 1–2 of 5 teams; from the next place down it costs trophies). It cannot be compared with a win rate — the brawlers can be compared with each other.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest two-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the two brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 638 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 3,562 real line-ups. In Showdown this counts a trophy gain, not a win.
What you see here. The best two-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 638 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 3,562 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (3 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Wendy |
77.1% | 2080 | 69 | 1.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Nori |
66.6% | 4514 | 81 | 4.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | ▲ 13 | Bolt |
72.6% | 452 | 47 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | ▼ 2 | Starr Nova |
67.1% | 997 | 58 | 0.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | ▲ 13 | Meeple |
68.3% | 334 | 42 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | ▼ 13 | Kit |
61.7% | 1205 | 61 | 1.1% | Good pick | ||
| 7 | ▲ 9 | Pierce |
64.5% | 521 | 49 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 8 | ▲ 2 | Chester |
63.3% | 627 | 52 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 9 | ▲ 7 | Doug |
65.4% | 416 | 45 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 10 | ▲ 18 | Sirius |
64.5% | 428 | 46 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 11 | ▲ 14 | Kaze |
63.5% | 438 | 46 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 12 | ▼ 3 | Stu |
60.6% | 789 | 55 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 13 | ▼ 4 | Mortis |
58.7% | 1306 | 63 | 1.3% | Good pick | ||
| 14 | ▲ 12 | Mina |
63.2% | 386 | 44 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | ▲ 29 | Trunk |
65.6% | 273 | 39 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 16 | ▲ 5 | Finx |
67.5% | 212 | 35 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | ▲ 74 | Jae-Yong |
66.8% | 211 | 35 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | ▲ 14 | Mico |
62.1% | 359 | 43 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | ▲ 11 | Gray |
61.0% | 441 | 46 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | ▼ 18 | Gus |
60.8% | 403 | 45 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | ▼ 28 | Bo |
58.6% | 679 | 53 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | ▲ 15 | Najia |
66.9% | 178 | 33 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | ▲ 27 | Moe |
67.3% | 156 | 31 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | ▲ 1 | Angelo |
63.8% | 213 | 35 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | ▲ 14 | Janet |
64.0% | 203 | 35 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 26 | ▼ 22 | Shade |
57.8% | 578 | 50 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 27 | ▲ 46 | R-T |
66.9% | 145 | 30 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 28 | – | Meg |
55.0% | 1624 | 66 | 1.6% | Good pick | ||
| 29 | ▼ 7 | Lumi |
61.0% | 259 | 38 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 30 | – | Mandy |
56.9% | 518 | 49 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 31 | ▲ 16 | Glowy |
58.5% | 340 | 42 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 32 | ▲ 32 | Damian |
62.6% | 171 | 32 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 33 | ▲ 40 | Sprout |
59.8% | 244 | 37 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 34 | ▼ 16 | Piper |
53.9% | 1359 | 63 | 1.4% | Solid | ||
| 35 | ▲ 41 | Lola |
60.2% | 221 | 36 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 36 | ▲ 25 | Alli |
58.8% | 274 | 39 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 37 | ▲ 11 | Ziggy |
69.3% | 88 | 22 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 38 | ▲ 52 | Gigi |
60.9% | 184 | 33 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 39 | ▼ 18 | Ruffs |
60.0% | 195 | 34 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 40 | NEW | Juju |
67.4% | 92 | 23 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 41 | ▲ 14 | Sam |
59.9% | 157 | 31 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 42 | ▲ 44 | Nani |
54.2% | 500 | 48 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 43 | ▼ 8 | Carl |
52.3% | 1148 | 61 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 44 | ▼ 19 | Griff |
51.3% | 2070 | 69 | 2.0% | Solid | ||
| 45 | ▲ 12 | Emz |
50.5% | 2585 | 73 | 2.6% | Solid | ||
| 46 | ▲ 30 | Draco |
58.0% | 162 | 31 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 47 | – | Willow |
55.7% | 183 | 33 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 48 | ▼ 15 | Max |
50.1% | 1509 | 65 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 49 | ▼ 39 | Edgar |
48.8% | 6299 | 86 | 6.2% | Solid | ||
| 50 | ▲ 15 | Byron |
50.5% | 1000 | 59 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 51 | ▼ 8 | Kenji |
49.7% | 1673 | 66 | 1.7% | Solid | ||
| 52 | ▼ 2 | Penny |
50.3% | 835 | 56 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 53 | ▼ 19 | Otis |
50.5% | 747 | 54 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 54 | ▼ 32 | 8-Bit |
49.2% | 1871 | 68 | 1.9% | Solid | ||
| 55 | ▼ 18 | Hank |
55.1% | 156 | 31 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 56 | ▼ 15 | Chuck |
60.0% | 80 | 21 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 57 | ▲ 16 | Pam |
50.1% | 694 | 53 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 58 | ▲ 12 | Amber |
51.6% | 320 | 41 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 59 | ▲ 8 | Fang |
49.1% | 1190 | 61 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 60 | ▼ 33 | Pearl |
49.4% | 886 | 57 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 61 | ▼ 20 | Bibi |
48.4% | 1744 | 67 | 1.7% | Solid | ||
| 62 | ▼ 28 | Frank |
48.4% | 1552 | 65 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 63 | ▼ 4 | Jessie |
48.8% | 981 | 58 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 64 | ▲ 20 | Leon |
48.0% | 1901 | 68 | 1.9% | Solid | ||
| 65 | ▼ 23 | Surge |
47.4% | 2315 | 71 | 2.3% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▼ 26 | Ash |
48.4% | 686 | 53 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▼ 12 | Cordelius |
47.7% | 1167 | 61 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▲ 9 | Squeak |
47.8% | 971 | 58 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▼ 10 | Bea |
47.5% | 935 | 58 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▼ 21 | Brock |
46.5% | 2703 | 73 | 2.7% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▼ 24 | Rosa |
47.6% | 712 | 53 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | – | Belle |
47.4% | 763 | 54 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▼ 8 | Lou |
47.2% | 712 | 53 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▼ 9 | Gale |
45.7% | 819 | 56 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▼ 14 | Poco |
45.0% | 937 | 58 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▲ 8 | Maisie |
45.0% | 738 | 54 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▼ 6 | Colt |
43.8% | 2806 | 74 | 2.8% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▲ 4 | Spike |
44.0% | 1976 | 69 | 2.0% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▼ 7 | Rico |
43.6% | 2550 | 73 | 2.5% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▼ 11 | Bonnie |
44.5% | 499 | 48 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▼ 37 | Shelly |
43.4% | 3138 | 76 | 3.2% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▼ 14 | Nita |
43.5% | 1671 | 66 | 1.7% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▼ 8 | Gene |
43.9% | 560 | 50 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▲ 9 | Colette |
43.2% | 1363 | 63 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▼ 27 | Darryl |
43.2% | 1037 | 59 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▼ 7 | Buzz |
42.9% | 990 | 58 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▲ 3 | Buster |
43.2% | 426 | 46 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▼ 8 | Sandy |
42.8% | 663 | 52 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▼ 3 | Eve |
42.7% | 539 | 49 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▼ 29 | Lily |
42.4% | 988 | 58 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▼ 42 | Melodie |
42.4% | 660 | 52 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▼ 14 | El Primo |
41.3% | 1478 | 64 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▲ 2 | Crow |
40.9% | 1964 | 69 | 2.0% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▲ 7 | Tick |
41.2% | 758 | 54 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▼ 19 | Charlie |
41.1% | 647 | 52 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▲ 2 | Jacky |
40.7% | 697 | 53 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▲ 2 | Tara |
40.4% | 1370 | 63 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▼ 8 | Bull |
40.4% | 1353 | 63 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▼ 3 | Dynamike |
38.8% | 1278 | 62 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▼ 8 | Clancy |
37.3% | 488 | 48 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▼ 4 | Berry |
37.2% | 631 | 52 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▼ 3 | Ollie |
35.9% | 348 | 43 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | ▲ 3 | Larry & Lawrie |
36.1% | 640 | 52 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | ▲ 1 | Grom |
35.2% | 511 | 48 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | ▼ 13 | Mr. P |
33.8% | 627 | 52 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | ▼ 4 | Barley |
33.6% | 786 | 55 | 0.8% | Rather not |