
Gem Grab
177,921 battles collected on this map — ranked only.
OPEN — more choice than on most maps: 44 of 105 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 7,566 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 621 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 7,566 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 621 real line-ups from a different rank tier, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (1,652 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here. The numbers also come from the solo queue: the battles behind them were fought by three strangers, not a practised team.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Bolt |
66.5% | 14532 | 99 | 1.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Clancy |
65.1% | 3580 | 78 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Doug |
59.8% | 6890 | 87 | 0.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | Ash |
58.3% | 4241 | 80 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | – | R-T |
60.0% | 1366 | 63 | 0.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | – | Griff |
55.7% | 37164 | 100 | 4.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | – | Bo |
55.6% | 29527 | 100 | 3.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | – | Bull |
55.1% | 15684 | 100 | 1.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | – | Bibi |
54.6% | 16254 | 100 | 1.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | – | Tara |
54.9% | 7711 | 89 | 0.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | – | Surge |
54.4% | 23386 | 100 | 2.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 12 | – | Jessie |
54.9% | 7925 | 89 | 0.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 13 | – | Damian |
55.2% | 3796 | 78 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 14 | – | Starr Nova |
53.8% | 17614 | 100 | 1.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 15 | – | Fang |
53.6% | 13267 | 97 | 1.4% | Good pick | ||
| 16 | – | Pearl |
54.3% | 3498 | 77 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | – | Rosa |
54.3% | 2983 | 75 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | ▲ 1 | Otis |
53.2% | 6855 | 87 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | ▼ 1 | Chester |
52.9% | 11090 | 95 | 1.2% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | – | Ruffs |
55.1% | 1255 | 62 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | – | Edgar |
52.0% | 102297 | 100 | 11.2% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | ▲ 1 | Mina |
53.3% | 3903 | 79 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | ▼ 1 | Janet |
54.1% | 1550 | 65 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | ▼ 1 | Charlie |
52.7% | 2734 | 74 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | – | Buster |
55.6% | 541 | 49 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 26 | ▲ 1 | Trunk |
51.1% | 27539 | 100 | 3.0% | Good pick | ||
| 27 | – | Rico |
51.0% | 27045 | 100 | 3.0% | Good pick | ||
| 28 | – | Mortis |
50.9% | 35591 | 100 | 3.9% | Good pick | ||
| 29 | – | Gale |
52.2% | 2727 | 74 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 30 | – | Cordelius |
51.2% | 8999 | 91 | 1.0% | Good pick | ||
| 31 | ▼ 1 | Lily |
51.0% | 12281 | 96 | 1.3% | Good pick | ||
| 32 | ▼ 2 | Crow |
50.7% | 22099 | 100 | 2.4% | Good pick | ||
| 33 | ▲ 3 | Nita |
51.3% | 6095 | 86 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 34 | – | Emz |
50.5% | 45223 | 100 | 4.9% | Good pick | ||
| 35 | – | Stu |
50.7% | 9187 | 92 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 36 | – | Kenji |
50.6% | 9461 | 92 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 37 | – | Darryl |
51.2% | 3860 | 79 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 38 | – | Carl |
51.1% | 4282 | 80 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 39 | – | Alli |
50.5% | 3401 | 77 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 40 | – | Sam |
52.6% | 654 | 52 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 41 | ▼ 1 | Meg |
49.7% | 5887 | 85 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 42 | – | Poco |
50.0% | 3325 | 76 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 43 | – | Buzz |
49.6% | 4770 | 82 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 44 | ▲ 1 | 8-Bit |
48.9% | 12924 | 97 | 1.4% | Solid | ||
| 45 | ▲ 1 | Maisie |
50.4% | 1289 | 62 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 46 | – | Gigi |
50.4% | 1072 | 60 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 47 | ▼ 1 | Sirius |
48.8% | 4557 | 81 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 48 | ▼ 1 | Finx |
50.5% | 876 | 57 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 49 | ▲ 1 | Nori |
47.6% | 90082 | 100 | 9.8% | Solid | ||
| 50 | – | Sandy |
49.0% | 2448 | 72 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 51 | ▲ 2 | Mr. P |
49.6% | 1219 | 61 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 52 | ▼ 2 | Moe |
49.9% | 855 | 56 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 53 | – | Kit |
48.1% | 5249 | 83 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 54 | – | Spike |
47.7% | 10588 | 94 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 55 | – | Tick |
47.4% | 8570 | 91 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 56 | – | Chuck |
48.6% | 1336 | 63 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 57 | – | Lumi |
47.8% | 2447 | 72 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | – | Lou |
47.8% | 2004 | 69 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | – | Draco |
48.5% | 937 | 58 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | – | Leon |
46.5% | 11072 | 94 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | – | Max |
46.7% | 6933 | 87 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▼ 2 | Shelly |
46.4% | 9587 | 92 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▲ 1 | Mico |
47.1% | 2157 | 70 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▼ 2 | Pierce |
46.7% | 3374 | 77 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▲ 4 | Jacky |
47.2% | 1642 | 66 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▲ 1 | Penny |
46.4% | 3789 | 78 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▼ 2 | Ollie |
49.8% | 225 | 36 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | – | Pam |
46.9% | 1193 | 61 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | – | Meeple |
45.6% | 3388 | 77 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | – | Frank |
45.0% | 7520 | 89 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▲ 1 | Gray |
45.6% | 1784 | 67 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | – | Lola |
46.5% | 591 | 51 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▼ 1 | Colt |
44.5% | 12154 | 96 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▲ 2 | Shade |
44.7% | 4531 | 81 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | – | Glowy |
45.6% | 962 | 58 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▼ 2 | Colette |
44.3% | 7443 | 89 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | – | Hank |
45.4% | 722 | 54 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▼ 1 | Brock |
43.6% | 16234 | 100 | 1.8% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▲ 3 | Najia |
44.8% | 1441 | 64 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▼ 1 | Amber |
44.5% | 1649 | 66 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▼ 1 | Gus |
43.9% | 2084 | 70 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | – | Eve |
44.6% | 522 | 49 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | – | Byron |
43.3% | 4338 | 80 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▼ 1 | Bea |
43.5% | 2148 | 70 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▲ 1 | El Primo |
42.9% | 3700 | 78 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | – | Kaze |
41.5% | 42050 | 100 | 4.6% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | – | Juju |
42.7% | 157 | 31 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | – | Dynamike |
42.0% | 5274 | 83 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | – | Jae-Yong |
42.3% | 239 | 37 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | – | Belle |
41.5% | 1062 | 59 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▲ 1 | Nani |
41.3% | 1271 | 62 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | – | Willow |
40.0% | 16972 | 100 | 1.9% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▼ 1 | Mandy |
40.3% | 2523 | 72 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | – | Ziggy |
40.2% | 341 | 42 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | – | Melodie |
40.5% | 945 | 58 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | – | Angelo |
39.5% | 253 | 38 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | – | Sprout |
39.5% | 816 | 55 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | – | Squeak |
38.6% | 4655 | 82 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | – | Grom |
38.5% | 979 | 58 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | – | Larry & Lawrie |
38.4% | 1012 | 59 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | – | Piper |
37.7% | 3405 | 77 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | – | Berry |
37.8% | 1123 | 60 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | – | Gene |
35.8% | 1113 | 60 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | – | Bonnie |
32.0% | 594 | 51 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Barley |
32.5% | 998 | 58 | 0.1% | Rather not |