Gem Grab

Gem Fort

60,823 battles collected on this map.

MEDIUM — an average amount of choice: 51 of 106 brawlers above 50%.

Recommendation

Damage Dealer 944 games

Damage Dealer 3536 games

Damage Dealer 1578 games

Controller 6247 games

Damage Dealer 1251 games

Damage Dealer 855 games

Damage Dealer 1203 games

Controller 1319 games

What the rating, star, trust and the tags mean

Strong pickThe rank on this map among all map/brawler rows of the mode (Gem Grab): Strong pick top tenth, Good pick top quarter, Solid upper half, Rather not the rest. The thresholds come from the field — the exact values are in the badge's tooltip. Not the tier list: that counts how many maps of the rotation a brawler is usable on. Rather not among the recommended eight therefore does not mean “bad”, but: this map has nothing better to offer.

TrustHow dependable the win rate next to it is, 0–100. Depends purely on the number of games — not on how good the brawler is.

Carry — becomes star player unusually often on this map: he deals the damage and takes the objective. The game runs through him.

Hidden gems & traps

From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.

Underrated

Damian 66.0%Winrate 2,324 games

Trunk 63.3%Winrate 1,438 games

R-T 63.7%Winrate 944 games

Pierce 61.5%Winrate 2,096 games

Overrated

Edgar 44.7%Winrate 14,478 games

Emz 45.1%Winrate 10,092 games

8-Bit 47.6%Winrate 7,484 games

Brock 42.4%Winrate 6,509 games

If you queue as three

The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.

Searched freely across 9,355 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 880 real line-ups.

67.8% expected

67.8% expected

67.8% expected

67.7% expected

67.7% expected

67.7% expected

How these numbers are arrived at

What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.

Best · on this map. All 9,355 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 880 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.

What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (360 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.

All brawlers on this map

Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.

#		Brawler	Win rate	Games	Trust	Pick rate	Rating
1	–	Wendy	73.8%	5636	84	1.2%	Strong pick
2	–	Bolt	70.4%	11274	95	2.9%	Strong pick
3	–	Starr Nova	65.6%	5341	84	1.2%	Strong pick
4	–	Nori	65.0%	10686	94	2.7%	Strong pick
5	–	Damian	66.0%	2324	71	0.5%	Strong pick
6	–	Trunk	63.3%	1438	64	0.4%	Strong pick
7	–	R-T	63.7%	944	58	0.3%	Strong pick
8	–	Pierce	61.5%	2096	70	0.5%	Strong pick
9	–	Glowy	62.6%	1081	60	0.3%	Strong pick
10	–	Sirius	61.1%	1859	68	0.4%	Strong pick
11	▲ 1	Draco	61.9%	1173	61	0.3%	Strong pick
12	▼ 1	Gigi	62.0%	1133	60	0.3%	Strong pick
13	–	Doug	60.3%	2371	71	0.6%	Strong pick
14	–	Janet	61.4%	1317	63	0.3%	Strong pick
15	–	Ash	59.1%	4499	81	1.4%	Strong pick
16	–	Chester	59.4%	3536	77	0.8%	Strong pick
17	–	Mina	59.1%	2811	74	0.8%	Strong pick
18	–	Finx	61.1%	874	57	0.2%	Strong pick
19	–	Lumi	59.4%	1578	65	0.4%	Good pick
20	–	Meeple	58.7%	1917	68	0.5%	Good pick
21	–	Bo	57.1%	6247	86	1.6%	Good pick
22	–	Alli	57.6%	2945	75	0.7%	Good pick
23	–	Moe	59.1%	1251	62	0.3%	Good pick
24	–	Shade	57.9%	2378	71	0.6%	Good pick
25	–	Kit	57.6%	2599	73	0.7%	Good pick
26	–	Stu	56.9%	3695	78	1.1%	Good pick
27	▲ 1	Ruffs	58.1%	1516	65	0.4%	Good pick
28	▼ 1	Najia	59.5%	845	56	0.2%	Good pick
29	–	Kaze	57.2%	2292	71	0.6%	Good pick
30	–	Gus	57.6%	1490	64	0.4%	Good pick
31	–	Lola	58.7%	855	56	0.3%	Good pick
32	–	Sam	58.7%	777	55	0.2%	Good pick
33	–	Gray	57.1%	1443	64	0.4%	Good pick
34	–	Jae-Yong	59.3%	585	51	0.2%	Good pick
35	–	Ziggy	58.9%	611	51	0.2%	Good pick
36	–	Chuck	56.9%	1203	61	0.3%	Good pick
37	–	Amber	56.6%	1319	63	0.3%	Good pick
38	–	Mico	57.2%	913	57	0.2%	Good pick
39	–	Sprout	56.6%	1061	59	0.3%	Good pick
40	–	Mortis	53.6%	11221	95	3.2%	Good pick
41	–	Griff	52.3%	8874	91	2.3%	Solid
42	–	Mandy	54.1%	1395	64	0.3%	Solid
43	–	Tara	52.5%	5157	83	1.3%	Solid
44	–	Juju	56.7%	395	45	0.1%	Solid
45	–	Hank	54.3%	742	54	0.2%	Solid
46	–	Clancy	51.8%	3004	75	0.8%	Solid
47	–	Willow	53.5%	660	52	0.2%	Solid
48	–	Rico	49.9%	12257	96	3.5%	Solid
49	–	Kenji	50.3%	6119	86	1.4%	Solid
50	–	Angelo	53.4%	476	47	0.1%	Solid
51	–	Pearl	50.2%	3322	76	1.0%	Solid
52	–	Nani	51.6%	833	56	0.2%	Solid
53	–	Surge	49.0%	8865	91	2.2%	Solid
54	–	Jessie	49.0%	5133	83	1.4%	Solid
55	–	Bull	48.1%	5932	85	1.5%	Solid
56	–	Rosa	48.3%	3701	78	1.0%	Solid
57	–	Charlie	48.8%	1965	69	0.5%	Solid
58	–	Otis	48.4%	2726	74	0.7%	Solid
59	–	Meg	47.9%	5199	83	1.5%	Rather not
60	–	8-Bit	47.6%	7484	89	2.2%	Rather not
61	–	Sandy	48.2%	3141	76	0.9%	Rather not
62	–	Carl	48.1%	3068	75	0.9%	Rather not
63	–	Max	47.2%	4060	79	1.2%	Rather not
64	–	Fang	46.5%	5243	83	1.4%	Rather not
65	▲ 1	Buzz	46.4%	3687	78	1.1%	Rather not
66	▼ 1	Nita	46.1%	5416	84	1.7%	Rather not
67	–	Lily	46.1%	4121	80	1.1%	Rather not
68	–	Bibi	45.7%	6254	86	1.8%	Rather not
69	–	Lou	46.0%	2112	70	0.6%	Rather not
70	–	Emz	45.1%	10092	93	2.9%	Rather not
71	–	Edgar	44.7%	14478	99	4.1%	Rather not
72	–	Crow	44.9%	7227	88	1.8%	Rather not
73	–	Penny	45.1%	3296	76	1.0%	Rather not
74	–	Poco	44.4%	4712	82	1.4%	Rather not
75	–	Cordelius	44.5%	3622	78	1.0%	Rather not
76	–	Jacky	44.8%	2136	70	0.6%	Rather not
77	–	Frank	43.8%	3833	79	1.1%	Rather not
78	–	Colette	43.8%	3679	78	1.1%	Rather not
79	–	Spike	43.6%	4395	81	1.2%	Rather not
80	–	Byron	42.7%	3423	77	1.0%	Rather not
81	–	Brock	42.4%	6509	87	1.9%	Rather not
82	–	Pam	42.5%	2380	71	0.7%	Rather not
83	–	Gale	42.2%	2458	72	0.7%	Rather not
84	–	Mr. P	42.0%	1684	66	0.4%	Rather not
85	–	Darryl	41.7%	2773	74	0.8%	Rather not
86	–	Leon	41.4%	4345	80	1.1%	Rather not
87	–	Shelly	41.1%	5622	84	1.5%	Rather not
88	–	Colt	41.0%	5729	85	1.8%	Rather not
89	–	Piper	40.6%	2756	74	0.8%	Rather not
90	–	El Primo	39.9%	3939	79	1.2%	Rather not
91	–	Buster	39.9%	1519	65	0.5%	Rather not
92	–	Ollie	39.7%	987	58	0.3%	Rather not
93	–	Squeak	39.1%	3355	77	1.0%	Rather not
94	–	Tick	38.9%	5588	84	1.7%	Rather not
95	–	Maisie	38.8%	1681	66	0.5%	Rather not
96	–	Larry & Lawrie	38.3%	1610	66	0.5%	Rather not
97	–	Dynamike	38.0%	4602	81	1.4%	Rather not
98	▲ 1	Gene	38.2%	1872	68	0.6%	Rather not
99	▼ 1	Barley	38.2%	2288	71	0.7%	Rather not
100	–	Berry	38.1%	1978	69	0.5%	Rather not
101	–	Belle	37.2%	1690	66	0.5%	Rather not
102	–	Bea	37.0%	2424	72	0.7%	Rather not
103	–	Eve	33.9%	1399	64	0.4%	Rather not
104	–	Melodie	33.9%	1668	66	0.5%	Rather not
105	–	Bonnie	33.6%	1329	63	0.5%	Rather not
106	–	Grom	33.0%	1385	63	0.4%	Rather not