Gem Grab

Gem Fort

52,667 battles collected on this map.

MEDIUM — an average amount of choice: 51 of 106 brawlers above 50%.

Recommendation

Damage Dealer 800 games

Damage Dealer 3167 games

Damage Dealer 1419 games

Controller 5444 games

Damage Dealer 1102 games

Damage Dealer 725 games

Damage Dealer 1042 games

Controller 1140 games

What the rating, star, trust and the tags mean

Strong pickThe rank on this map among all map/brawler rows of the mode (Gem Grab): Strong pick top tenth, Good pick top quarter, Solid upper half, Rather not the rest. The thresholds come from the field — the exact values are in the badge's tooltip. Not the tier list: that counts how many maps of the rotation a brawler is usable on. Rather not among the recommended eight therefore does not mean “bad”, but: this map has nothing better to offer.

TrustHow dependable the win rate next to it is, 0–100. Depends purely on the number of games — not on how good the brawler is.

Carry — becomes star player unusually often on this map: he deals the damage and takes the objective. The game runs through him.

Hidden gems & traps

From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.

Underrated

Damian 65.7%Winrate 2,025 games

Pierce 61.5%Winrate 1,862 games

R-T 63.7%Winrate 800 games

Trunk 62.3%Winrate 1,231 games

Overrated

Edgar 44.8%Winrate 12,462 games

Emz 44.7%Winrate 8,628 games

8-Bit 48.0%Winrate 6,425 games

Brock 42.8%Winrate 5,616 games

If you queue as three

The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.

Searched freely across 4,649 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 536 real line-ups.

71.7% expected

71.6% expected

71.4% expected

71.4% expected

71.3% expected

71.3% expected

How these numbers are arrived at

What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.

Best · on this map. All 4,649 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 536 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.

What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (127 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.

All brawlers on this map

Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.

#		Brawler	Win rate	Games	Trust	Pick rate	Rating
1	–	Wendy	73.9%	5026	83	1.2%	Strong pick
2	–	Bolt	70.4%	9894	93	3.0%	Strong pick
3	–	Starr Nova	65.4%	4730	82	1.2%	Strong pick
4	–	Nori	64.6%	9434	92	2.7%	Strong pick
5	–	Damian	65.7%	2025	69	0.5%	Strong pick
6	–	Pierce	61.5%	1862	68	0.5%	Strong pick
7	–	R-T	63.7%	800	55	0.3%	Strong pick
8	–	Trunk	62.3%	1231	62	0.3%	Strong pick
9	–	Glowy	62.8%	923	57	0.3%	Strong pick
10	–	Gigi	62.2%	1000	59	0.3%	Strong pick
11	–	Sirius	60.7%	1678	66	0.4%	Strong pick
12	–	Ash	59.4%	3850	79	1.4%	Strong pick
13	–	Janet	61.5%	1136	60	0.3%	Strong pick
14	–	Doug	59.9%	2038	69	0.6%	Strong pick
15	–	Draco	61.4%	1000	59	0.3%	Strong pick
16	–	Finx	62.1%	794	55	0.2%	Strong pick
17	–	Chester	58.9%	3167	76	0.8%	Strong pick
18	–	Mina	59.0%	2417	72	0.8%	Strong pick
19	–	Lumi	59.3%	1419	64	0.4%	Good pick
20	–	Alli	57.8%	2608	73	0.7%	Good pick
21	–	Bo	56.8%	5444	84	1.6%	Good pick
22	–	Meeple	58.2%	1709	67	0.5%	Good pick
23	–	Moe	59.0%	1102	60	0.3%	Good pick
24	–	Kit	57.5%	2286	71	0.7%	Good pick
25	–	Shade	57.4%	2113	70	0.6%	Good pick
26	–	Stu	56.5%	3171	76	1.1%	Good pick
27	–	Kaze	56.9%	2014	69	0.5%	Good pick
28	–	Ruffs	57.7%	1318	63	0.3%	Good pick
29	–	Lola	59.2%	725	54	0.3%	Good pick
30	–	Gus	57.3%	1264	62	0.4%	Good pick
31	–	Najia	58.4%	752	54	0.2%	Good pick
32	–	Ziggy	59.1%	508	48	0.1%	Good pick
33	–	Jae-Yong	59.0%	512	49	0.2%	Good pick
34	▲ 1	Chuck	56.1%	1042	59	0.3%	Good pick
35	▼ 1	Mico	56.8%	796	55	0.2%	Good pick
36	–	Gray	55.7%	1248	62	0.4%	Good pick
37	–	Mortis	53.4%	9689	92	3.2%	Good pick
38	–	Sprout	56.1%	924	57	0.2%	Good pick
39	–	Amber	55.4%	1140	60	0.3%	Good pick
40	–	Sam	56.8%	664	52	0.2%	Good pick
41	–	Griff	52.4%	7722	89	2.3%	Solid
42	–	Tara	52.4%	4471	81	1.3%	Solid
43	–	Mandy	53.8%	1257	62	0.3%	Solid
44	–	Clancy	52.5%	2608	73	0.8%	Solid
45	–	Juju	55.7%	334	42	0.1%	Solid
46	–	Kenji	50.6%	5489	84	1.4%	Solid
47	–	Rico	50.0%	10568	94	3.6%	Solid
48	–	Willow	53.2%	594	51	0.2%	Solid
49	–	Hank	52.7%	615	51	0.2%	Solid
50	–	Pearl	50.3%	2819	74	1.0%	Solid
51	–	Nani	52.1%	741	54	0.2%	Solid
52	–	Surge	49.2%	7796	89	2.2%	Solid
53	–	Rosa	49.1%	3188	76	0.9%	Solid
54	–	Jessie	48.6%	4411	81	1.3%	Solid
55	▲ 1	Meg	48.5%	4504	81	1.5%	Solid
56	▼ 1	Charlie	49.3%	1687	66	0.5%	Solid
57	–	Bull	48.3%	5155	83	1.5%	Solid
58	–	Otis	48.8%	2413	72	0.7%	Solid
59	–	8-Bit	48.0%	6425	86	2.2%	Solid
60	–	Angelo	51.0%	418	45	0.1%	Solid
61	–	Sandy	48.3%	2670	73	0.9%	Rather not
62	–	Max	47.8%	3491	77	1.2%	Rather not
63	–	Carl	47.5%	2646	73	0.9%	Rather not
64	–	Nita	46.3%	4622	81	1.8%	Rather not
65	–	Buzz	46.4%	3154	76	1.0%	Rather not
66	–	Fang	46.0%	4575	81	1.4%	Rather not
67	–	Lily	46.0%	3556	78	1.1%	Rather not
68	–	Bibi	45.4%	5381	84	1.8%	Rather not
69	–	Edgar	44.8%	12462	96	4.1%	Rather not
70	–	Emz	44.7%	8628	91	2.9%	Rather not
71	–	Crow	44.4%	6354	86	1.9%	Rather not
72	–	Penny	44.8%	2790	74	0.9%	Rather not
73	–	Lou	45.0%	1842	68	0.6%	Rather not
74	–	Cordelius	44.6%	3161	76	1.0%	Rather not
75	–	Jacky	44.4%	1823	68	0.6%	Rather not
76	–	Poco	43.5%	4002	79	1.3%	Rather not
77	–	Spike	43.5%	3840	79	1.2%	Rather not
78	–	Colette	43.5%	3145	76	1.1%	Rather not
79	▲ 1	Frank	43.1%	3337	77	1.1%	Rather not
80	▼ 1	Byron	43.2%	2944	75	1.0%	Rather not
81	▲ 1	Brock	42.8%	5616	84	1.9%	Rather not
82	▼ 1	Gale	43.2%	2093	70	0.7%	Rather not
83	–	Pam	42.2%	2024	69	0.8%	Rather not
84	–	Leon	41.4%	3764	78	1.1%	Rather not
85	–	Mr. P	41.8%	1479	64	0.5%	Rather not
86	–	Colt	41.2%	4857	82	1.8%	Rather not
87	–	Shelly	40.7%	4899	82	1.5%	Rather not
88	–	Piper	40.9%	2351	71	0.8%	Rather not
89	–	Darryl	40.8%	2366	71	0.8%	Rather not
90	▲ 1	Buster	40.3%	1263	62	0.4%	Rather not
91	▼ 1	Ollie	40.3%	863	56	0.3%	Rather not
92	–	El Primo	39.6%	3353	77	1.2%	Rather not
93	–	Tick	39.0%	4749	82	1.7%	Rather not
94	–	Squeak	39.0%	2831	74	1.0%	Rather not
95	–	Larry & Lawrie	39.0%	1386	63	0.5%	Rather not
96	–	Maisie	38.7%	1434	64	0.5%	Rather not
97	–	Dynamike	38.2%	3939	79	1.4%	Rather not
98	–	Barley	38.1%	1965	69	0.7%	Rather not
99	▲ 1	Gene	37.8%	1602	66	0.6%	Rather not
100	▼ 1	Berry	37.8%	1728	67	0.6%	Rather not
101	–	Belle	37.3%	1461	64	0.5%	Rather not
102	–	Bea	36.2%	2039	69	0.7%	Rather not
103	–	Eve	34.4%	1185	61	0.4%	Rather not
104	–	Bonnie	34.1%	1111	60	0.5%	Rather not
105	–	Melodie	34.0%	1411	64	0.5%	Rather not
106	–	Grom	32.7%	1142	61	0.4%	Rather not