
Hot Zone
79,975 battles collected on this map.
OPEN — more choice than on most maps: 55 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 5,647 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 294 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 5,647 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 294 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (29 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Wendy |
74.2% | 9159 | 92 | 1.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Hank |
70.5% | 3849 | 79 | 1.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Bolt |
69.2% | 3979 | 79 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | Nori |
67.2% | 9647 | 92 | 1.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | – | Starr Nova |
65.3% | 4924 | 82 | 0.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | – | Damian |
65.2% | 1866 | 68 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | – | Bo |
62.0% | 13096 | 97 | 2.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | – | Chuck |
62.3% | 4812 | 82 | 1.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | – | Draco |
63.9% | 1625 | 66 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | ▲ 1 | Glowy |
63.3% | 1756 | 67 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | ▲ 3 | Doug |
62.9% | 2013 | 69 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 12 | ▼ 2 | Trunk |
64.2% | 1158 | 61 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 13 | ▼ 1 | Finx |
62.8% | 1818 | 67 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 14 | ▼ 1 | Sirius |
61.3% | 4264 | 80 | 1.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 15 | – | Mina |
61.0% | 2879 | 74 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 16 | ▲ 1 | Jae-Yong |
63.6% | 725 | 54 | 0.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 17 | ▼ 1 | Pierce |
58.9% | 5695 | 85 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 18 | – | Lumi |
59.8% | 2284 | 71 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 19 | – | Gray |
59.1% | 3608 | 78 | 0.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 20 | – | Sprout |
60.2% | 1449 | 64 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | – | Kaze |
59.8% | 1487 | 64 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | ▲ 3 | Stu |
58.5% | 2458 | 72 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | ▼ 1 | Moe |
59.7% | 1145 | 61 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | ▲ 2 | R-T |
61.2% | 662 | 52 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | ▲ 2 | Chester |
58.2% | 2169 | 70 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 26 | ▼ 2 | Amber |
57.8% | 2708 | 73 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 27 | ▲ 1 | Gigi |
59.7% | 990 | 58 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 28 | ▲ 1 | Ziggy |
58.2% | 1681 | 66 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 29 | ▲ 1 | Ruffs |
59.2% | 1007 | 59 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 30 | ▼ 7 | Shade |
58.2% | 1521 | 65 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 31 | ▲ 4 | Lola |
58.6% | 1061 | 59 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 32 | ▼ 1 | Tick |
55.1% | 36025 | 100 | 8.7% | Good pick | ||
| 33 | ▼ 1 | Meeple |
58.1% | 1266 | 62 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 34 | – | Sam |
58.5% | 985 | 58 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 35 | ▼ 2 | Griff |
54.9% | 12871 | 97 | 2.6% | Good pick | ||
| 36 | – | Nani |
56.8% | 1641 | 66 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 37 | – | Kenji |
54.7% | 12725 | 97 | 3.0% | Good pick | ||
| 38 | ▲ 2 | Emz |
53.8% | 18801 | 100 | 4.0% | Good pick | ||
| 39 | – | Meg |
53.9% | 11610 | 95 | 1.4% | Good pick | ||
| 40 | ▲ 2 | Gus |
56.1% | 1377 | 63 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 41 | ▼ 3 | Najia |
56.9% | 934 | 58 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 42 | ▼ 1 | Jessie |
53.5% | 10456 | 94 | 2.2% | Good pick | ||
| 43 | – | Juju |
56.5% | 784 | 55 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 44 | ▲ 2 | Mico |
55.8% | 787 | 55 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 45 | ▲ 4 | Alli |
56.7% | 547 | 49 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 46 | ▼ 2 | Janet |
55.1% | 878 | 57 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 47 | ▲ 3 | Angelo |
55.5% | 616 | 51 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 48 | ▼ 1 | Mortis |
51.9% | 8645 | 91 | 2.0% | Solid | ||
| 49 | ▲ 1 | Bibi |
51.8% | 9841 | 93 | 2.4% | Solid | ||
| 50 | – | Kit |
52.5% | 3096 | 75 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 51 | ▼ 6 | Lou |
51.8% | 6421 | 86 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 52 | ▼ 1 | Berry |
51.2% | 8451 | 90 | 1.9% | Solid | ||
| 53 | – | Penny |
50.6% | 11612 | 95 | 2.6% | Solid | ||
| 54 | – | Nita |
50.2% | 6595 | 87 | 1.4% | Solid | ||
| 55 | – | Mandy |
50.4% | 3155 | 76 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 56 | ▲ 1 | Squeak |
48.8% | 10651 | 94 | 2.7% | Solid | ||
| 57 | ▼ 1 | Tara |
49.1% | 3335 | 77 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 58 | – | Pam |
49.0% | 2837 | 74 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 59 | – | Poco |
47.7% | 8692 | 91 | 1.6% | Solid | ||
| 60 | ▲ 1 | Willow |
48.0% | 781 | 55 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | ▼ 1 | Ash |
46.4% | 3306 | 76 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | – | Fang |
46.1% | 5281 | 83 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | – | Colette |
44.6% | 4565 | 81 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▲ 2 | Barley |
44.2% | 6322 | 86 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▼ 2 | Eve |
44.7% | 2084 | 70 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | – | Frank |
44.0% | 7638 | 89 | 1.7% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | – | Spike |
44.0% | 7033 | 88 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▲ 1 | Melodie |
44.0% | 2868 | 74 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▼ 1 | Gale |
43.9% | 3661 | 78 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▲ 1 | Edgar |
43.1% | 14317 | 98 | 3.1% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▲ 1 | Carl |
43.2% | 4235 | 80 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▼ 2 | 8-Bit |
42.9% | 8899 | 91 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▲ 1 | Crow |
42.7% | 7030 | 88 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▲ 1 | El Primo |
42.2% | 5834 | 85 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▼ 2 | Sandy |
42.2% | 3857 | 79 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▲ 1 | Dynamike |
41.4% | 9361 | 92 | 2.2% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▲ 1 | Larry & Lawrie |
41.3% | 2523 | 72 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▼ 2 | Pearl |
41.2% | 2537 | 72 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▲ 1 | Max |
40.7% | 3494 | 77 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▼ 1 | Surge |
40.4% | 6329 | 86 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▲ 1 | Rosa |
40.3% | 3035 | 75 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▼ 1 | Clancy |
40.2% | 3046 | 75 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | – | Bull |
39.8% | 4212 | 80 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | – | Brock |
38.7% | 7286 | 88 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | – | Rico |
38.2% | 5152 | 83 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | – | Piper |
38.1% | 3326 | 77 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | – | Belle |
37.3% | 1712 | 67 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | – | Shelly |
36.5% | 4387 | 81 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▲ 2 | Colt |
35.0% | 5933 | 85 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▼ 1 | Maisie |
35.1% | 1955 | 69 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▼ 1 | Byron |
34.9% | 4043 | 79 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | – | Buzz |
34.7% | 1891 | 68 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▲ 1 | Leon |
34.7% | 2464 | 72 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▲ 2 | Grom |
34.0% | 2673 | 73 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▼ 2 | Jacky |
33.8% | 2619 | 73 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▼ 1 | Buster |
33.1% | 2167 | 70 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | – | Ollie |
32.5% | 1068 | 60 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | – | Mr. P |
32.7% | 1801 | 67 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | – | Otis |
31.8% | 1766 | 67 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | – | Cordelius |
30.5% | 1765 | 67 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | – | Bonnie |
29.5% | 1547 | 65 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▲ 2 | Bea |
28.4% | 2525 | 72 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | – | Darryl |
28.5% | 3191 | 76 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | ▼ 2 | Lily |
28.1% | 1905 | 68 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Charlie |
27.7% | 1615 | 66 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Gene |
23.2% | 1682 | 66 | 0.3% | Rather not |