Brawl Ball

Grass Knot

405,275 battles collected on this map.

OPEN — more choice than on most maps: 72 of 106 brawlers above 50%.

Recommendation

Damage Dealer 18424 games

Damage Dealer 4819 games

Controller 17437 games

Damage Dealer 15814 games

Controller 12916 games

Controller 6793 games

Damage Dealer 12231 games

Damage Dealer 9867 games

Controller 10160 games

Damage Dealer 27245 games

Controller 8110 games

What the rating, star, trust and the tags mean

Strong pickThe rank on this map among all map/brawler rows of the mode (Brawl Ball): Strong pick top tenth, Good pick top quarter, Solid upper half, Rather not the rest. The thresholds come from the field — the exact values are in the badge's tooltip. Not the tier list: that counts how many maps of the rotation a brawler is usable on. Rather not among the recommended eight therefore does not mean “bad”, but: this map has nothing better to offer.

TrustHow dependable the win rate next to it is, 0–100. Depends purely on the number of games — not on how good the brawler is.

Carry — becomes star player unusually often on this map: he deals the damage and takes the objective. The game runs through him.

Hidden gems & traps

From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.

Underrated

Jae-Yong 61.6%Winrate 4,596 games

Gigi 60.9%Winrate 9,881 games

Finx 61.1%Winrate 5,910 games

R-T 61.2%Winrate 4,819 games

Overrated

Edgar 35.4%Winrate 145,637 games

Colt 40.0%Winrate 84,277 games

Rico 41.7%Winrate 74,562 games

Bibi 46.6%Winrate 86,983 games

If you queue as three

The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.

Searched freely across 9,880 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 6,757 real line-ups.

79.2% expected

79.2% expected

79.0% expected

79.0% expected

78.7% expected

78.4% expected

How these numbers are arrived at

What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.

Best · on this map. All 9,880 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 6,757 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.

What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (15 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.

All brawlers on this map

Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.

#		Brawler	Win rate	Games	Trust	Pick rate	Rating
1	–	Wendy	75.8%	34830	100	1.5%	Strong pick
2	–	Bolt	65.6%	22959	100	1.0%	Strong pick
3	–	Ash	65.4%	12684	97	0.7%	Strong pick
4	–	Nori	64.6%	105442	100	4.2%	Strong pick
5	–	Damian	64.2%	20300	100	0.7%	Strong pick
6	–	Starr Nova	63.7%	46219	100	1.8%	Strong pick
7	–	Lumi	61.5%	18424	100	0.8%	Strong pick
8	–	Jae-Yong	61.6%	4596	81	0.2%	Strong pick
9	–	Gigi	60.9%	9881	93	0.4%	Strong pick
10	▲ 1	Finx	61.1%	5910	85	0.2%	Good pick
11	▲ 2	R-T	61.2%	4819	82	0.2%	Good pick
12	▼ 2	Otis	60.2%	17437	100	0.6%	Good pick
13	▼ 1	Clancy	60.2%	15814	100	0.6%	Good pick
14	–	Trunk	60.4%	7743	89	0.3%	Good pick
15	▲ 1	Pierce	59.6%	23330	100	0.9%	Good pick
16	▼ 1	Lou	59.8%	12916	97	0.5%	Good pick
17	–	Charlie	60.0%	6793	87	0.3%	Good pick
18	–	Draco	59.9%	6823	87	0.3%	Good pick
19	▲ 1	Doug	59.6%	10729	94	0.5%	Good pick
20	▼ 1	Moe	59.5%	12231	96	0.4%	Good pick
21	–	Pearl	59.5%	9867	93	0.4%	Good pick
22	–	Glowy	59.9%	5323	84	0.2%	Good pick
23	–	Meg	58.8%	31980	100	1.5%	Good pick
24	–	Sirius	58.9%	15496	100	0.6%	Good pick
25	–	Sandy	58.9%	10160	93	0.4%	Good pick
26	–	Ollie	59.4%	4372	81	0.2%	Good pick
27	–	Mina	57.9%	27081	100	1.3%	Good pick
28	–	Buster	58.8%	5193	83	0.2%	Good pick
29	–	Chester	57.6%	27245	100	1.0%	Good pick
30	–	Ruffs	57.8%	7440	89	0.3%	Good pick
31	–	Kaze	57.3%	15120	99	0.6%	Good pick
32	–	Ziggy	58.1%	4639	81	0.2%	Good pick
33	–	Meeple	57.3%	11247	95	0.5%	Solid
34	–	Shade	56.8%	13595	98	0.7%	Solid
35	–	Amber	56.9%	8110	90	0.4%	Solid
36	–	Sam	56.8%	6148	86	0.3%	Solid
37	–	Najia	56.7%	5205	83	0.2%	Solid
38	–	Stu	55.4%	39695	100	1.8%	Solid
39	–	Maisie	55.8%	10507	94	0.4%	Solid
40	▲ 2	Cordelius	55.4%	15560	100	0.6%	Solid
41	▼ 1	Gray	55.5%	13559	98	0.5%	Solid
42	▼ 1	Bo	55.3%	18694	100	0.6%	Solid
43	▲ 1	Willow	55.6%	7122	88	0.3%	Solid
44	▼ 1	Melodie	55.1%	16429	100	0.7%	Solid
45	–	Max	54.5%	38199	100	1.7%	Solid
46	–	Gale	54.7%	17078	100	0.5%	Solid
47	–	Lola	55.5%	4257	80	0.2%	Solid
48	–	Sprout	54.5%	10000	93	0.3%	Solid
49	–	Buzz	54.1%	20627	100	0.8%	Solid
50	–	Hank	54.8%	5609	84	0.2%	Solid
51	–	Pam	54.8%	4892	82	0.2%	Solid
52	–	Alli	54.6%	4700	82	0.2%	Solid
53	–	Kit	53.7%	12578	96	0.5%	Solid
54	–	Griff	52.7%	99439	100	3.6%	Solid
55	–	Janet	54.2%	3473	77	0.1%	Solid
56	–	Tara	52.9%	18003	100	0.8%	Solid
57	–	Bea	53.0%	12427	96	0.5%	Solid
58	–	Kenji	52.5%	45454	100	1.6%	Solid
59	–	Larry & Lawrie	53.3%	4900	82	0.2%	Solid
60	–	Carl	52.5%	20240	100	0.9%	Solid
61	–	Lily	52.8%	7679	89	0.3%	Solid
62	–	Juju	53.8%	2303	71	0.1%	Solid
63	–	Fang	51.7%	47012	100	1.9%	Rather not
64	–	Eve	53.2%	2850	74	0.1%	Rather not
65	–	Berry	51.9%	7228	88	0.2%	Rather not
66	–	Bonnie	52.2%	4119	80	0.2%	Rather not
67	–	Poco	50.5%	22681	100	1.0%	Rather not
68	–	Gus	50.8%	7375	88	0.4%	Rather not
69	–	Byron	50.1%	13095	97	0.5%	Rather not
70	–	Squeak	50.2%	10149	93	0.4%	Rather not
71	–	Mico	50.7%	3439	77	0.1%	Rather not
72	–	Belle	50.3%	4729	82	0.2%	Rather not
73	–	Mortis	49.0%	93263	100	4.0%	Rather not
74	–	Mandy	49.2%	9653	92	0.3%	Rather not
75	▲ 1	Jacky	48.8%	9800	93	0.4%	Rather not
76	▼ 1	Chuck	49.9%	2125	70	0.1%	Rather not
77	–	Spike	47.8%	31631	100	1.2%	Rather not
78	–	Mr. P	48.8%	3220	76	0.1%	Rather not
79	–	Darryl	47.8%	19910	100	0.9%	Rather not
80	–	Gene	48.2%	3864	79	0.2%	Rather not
81	–	Bull	47.0%	42167	100	1.6%	Rather not
82	–	Bibi	46.6%	86983	100	3.3%	Rather not
83	–	Grom	47.5%	4660	82	0.1%	Rather not
84	–	Colette	46.6%	27270	100	1.0%	Rather not
85	–	Leon	46.5%	16604	100	0.7%	Rather not
86	–	Brock	46.2%	44942	100	1.7%	Rather not
87	–	Penny	46.7%	9275	92	0.3%	Rather not
88	–	Surge	46.0%	88469	100	3.3%	Rather not
89	–	Rosa	46.3%	7784	89	0.3%	Rather not
90	–	Nani	46.4%	5453	84	0.2%	Rather not
91	–	8-Bit	45.6%	29370	100	1.2%	Rather not
92	–	Tick	45.1%	20431	100	0.7%	Rather not
93	–	Piper	45.0%	11008	94	0.4%	Rather not
94	–	Jessie	44.7%	16169	100	0.6%	Rather not
95	–	Emz	43.6%	67254	100	2.5%	Rather not
96	–	Frank	43.0%	55610	100	2.4%	Rather not
97	–	Rico	41.7%	74562	100	3.3%	Rather not
98	–	Angelo	42.8%	1825	68	0.1%	Rather not
99	–	Crow	41.3%	42577	100	1.7%	Rather not
100	–	Dynamike	40.5%	40246	100	1.6%	Rather not
101	–	Colt	40.0%	84277	100	3.6%	Rather not
102	–	Barley	38.8%	9559	92	0.4%	Rather not
103	–	El Primo	38.2%	39148	100	2.1%	Rather not
104	–	Edgar	35.4%	145637	100	6.6%	Rather not
105	–	Nita	32.4%	42724	100	2.2%	Rather not
106	–	Shelly	27.6%	59978	100	2.9%	Rather not