
Gem Grab
308,139 battles collected on this map.
TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 43 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 7,856 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 204 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 7,856 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 204 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (379 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Bolt |
62.3% | 18462 | 100 | 1.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Bo |
58.3% | 50022 | 100 | 2.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Damian |
57.9% | 11627 | 95 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | Wendy |
56.6% | 146422 | 100 | 7.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | – | Starr Nova |
56.7% | 22842 | 100 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | – | Bibi |
55.6% | 36807 | 100 | 2.0% | Good pick | ||
| 7 | ▲ 1 | Ash |
55.5% | 10048 | 93 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 8 | ▼ 1 | Griff |
54.8% | 52930 | 100 | 2.9% | Good pick | ||
| 9 | ▲ 3 | Sirius |
54.6% | 16381 | 100 | 0.9% | Good pick | ||
| 10 | – | Rico |
54.2% | 68241 | 100 | 3.7% | Good pick | ||
| 11 | – | Clancy |
54.8% | 9511 | 92 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 12 | ▼ 3 | Moe |
54.8% | 5867 | 85 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 13 | – | Mortis |
53.7% | 50497 | 100 | 2.7% | Good pick | ||
| 14 | – | Surge |
53.6% | 44681 | 100 | 2.4% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | ▲ 2 | Janet |
54.2% | 6737 | 87 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 16 | ▼ 1 | Mina |
53.9% | 8475 | 90 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | ▼ 1 | Nori |
53.2% | 40536 | 100 | 2.2% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | – | Tara |
53.4% | 20265 | 100 | 1.1% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | ▲ 1 | Edgar |
52.6% | 117021 | 100 | 6.3% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | ▼ 1 | Lumi |
53.5% | 6935 | 87 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | ▲ 2 | Emz |
52.3% | 67167 | 100 | 3.6% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | – | Shade |
52.8% | 12831 | 97 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | ▼ 2 | Chester |
52.3% | 18424 | 100 | 1.0% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | – | Lily |
52.1% | 22934 | 100 | 1.2% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | ▲ 1 | Kenji |
52.1% | 22532 | 100 | 1.2% | Good pick | ||
| 26 | ▼ 1 | Ruffs |
52.3% | 6707 | 87 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 27 | ▲ 1 | Gigi |
52.5% | 4975 | 83 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 28 | ▼ 1 | Mico |
52.2% | 7495 | 89 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 29 | – | Crow |
51.5% | 46162 | 100 | 2.5% | Solid | ||
| 30 | – | Alli |
51.8% | 8643 | 91 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 31 | ▲ 1 | Fang |
50.9% | 25026 | 100 | 1.4% | Solid | ||
| 32 | ▼ 1 | Pierce |
51.0% | 9054 | 91 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 33 | – | Sandy |
50.8% | 12288 | 96 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 34 | ▲ 1 | Spike |
50.4% | 29944 | 100 | 1.6% | Solid | ||
| 35 | ▼ 1 | Finx |
51.2% | 5166 | 83 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 36 | ▲ 5 | Charlie |
50.9% | 7781 | 89 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 37 | ▼ 1 | Kit |
50.3% | 15979 | 100 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 38 | – | Carl |
50.3% | 16008 | 100 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 39 | – | Jessie |
49.9% | 22430 | 100 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 40 | – | Tick |
49.8% | 26057 | 100 | 1.4% | Solid | ||
| 41 | ▲ 2 | Pearl |
50.1% | 9891 | 93 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 42 | – | Draco |
50.6% | 4128 | 80 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 43 | ▼ 6 | Doug |
50.0% | 8412 | 90 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 44 | – | Trunk |
50.1% | 6469 | 86 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 45 | ▲ 2 | Jae-Yong |
50.4% | 3206 | 76 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 46 | ▼ 1 | Leon |
49.2% | 28231 | 100 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 47 | ▼ 1 | Stu |
48.9% | 15729 | 100 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 48 | ▲ 1 | Cordelius |
48.7% | 15620 | 100 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 49 | ▼ 1 | 8-Bit |
48.4% | 26169 | 100 | 1.4% | Solid | ||
| 50 | ▲ 1 | Amber |
48.0% | 8252 | 90 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 51 | ▲ 1 | Buzz |
47.7% | 14940 | 99 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 52 | ▼ 2 | Meeple |
47.9% | 7942 | 90 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 53 | ▲ 6 | Squeak |
47.4% | 17404 | 100 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 54 | ▼ 1 | Hank |
47.8% | 5552 | 84 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 55 | – | Juju |
48.1% | 2965 | 75 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 56 | ▲ 8 | Sprout |
47.7% | 4855 | 82 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 57 | ▲ 1 | Otis |
47.3% | 10922 | 94 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 58 | ▼ 1 | Max |
47.2% | 13012 | 97 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 59 | ▼ 3 | Kaze |
47.3% | 8457 | 90 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | ▲ 3 | Larry & Lawrie |
47.4% | 6370 | 86 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | ▼ 1 | Ziggy |
47.7% | 3187 | 76 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▼ 1 | Glowy |
47.5% | 4200 | 80 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▼ 9 | R-T |
47.5% | 3498 | 77 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▲ 1 | Penny |
46.5% | 15950 | 100 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▼ 3 | Meg |
46.3% | 14108 | 98 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▲ 2 | Gale |
45.9% | 12403 | 96 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▲ 4 | Sam |
46.2% | 5262 | 83 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▼ 2 | Najia |
46.0% | 5766 | 85 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▼ 2 | Bull |
45.4% | 24617 | 100 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▲ 2 | Lola |
45.9% | 5659 | 84 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▼ 2 | Nita |
45.3% | 21020 | 100 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▼ 2 | Mr. P |
45.7% | 8069 | 90 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▲ 2 | Buster |
45.4% | 4658 | 82 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▲ 2 | Ollie |
45.5% | 3399 | 77 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▼ 2 | Dynamike |
44.7% | 23044 | 100 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▼ 2 | Lou |
44.8% | 8908 | 91 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | – | Frank |
44.2% | 17300 | 100 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | – | Gray |
44.3% | 6258 | 86 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | – | Maisie |
44.0% | 7960 | 90 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▲ 1 | Melodie |
44.1% | 5005 | 83 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▼ 1 | Pam |
43.5% | 8601 | 91 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | – | Darryl |
43.2% | 14453 | 98 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | – | Mandy |
42.7% | 8938 | 91 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▲ 1 | Colette |
42.4% | 18029 | 100 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▼ 1 | Brock |
42.3% | 32221 | 100 | 1.7% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▲ 1 | Eve |
42.9% | 4554 | 81 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▼ 1 | Rosa |
42.0% | 13776 | 98 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | – | Byron |
41.3% | 11770 | 95 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | – | Nani |
41.0% | 7275 | 88 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▲ 1 | Jacky |
40.6% | 8743 | 91 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▼ 1 | Chuck |
40.6% | 3942 | 79 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | – | Poco |
39.6% | 18505 | 100 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▲ 1 | Gus |
39.5% | 8541 | 91 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▲ 3 | Shelly |
39.1% | 22866 | 100 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | – | Colt |
38.8% | 27971 | 100 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▲ 2 | Bea |
39.0% | 9783 | 93 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▼ 1 | Gene |
39.0% | 8173 | 90 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▼ 5 | Willow |
39.1% | 4706 | 82 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▲ 1 | Bonnie |
38.8% | 5483 | 84 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▼ 1 | Grom |
38.5% | 7734 | 89 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | – | Berry |
37.4% | 6869 | 87 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | – | Belle |
37.3% | 6608 | 87 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | ▲ 1 | El Primo |
35.0% | 15612 | 100 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | ▼ 1 | Piper |
35.0% | 10533 | 94 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Angelo |
34.7% | 3125 | 76 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Barley |
32.5% | 11415 | 95 | 0.6% | Rather not |